Science Forums: nec209 - Viewing Profile - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse

nec209's Profile User Rating: -----

Reputation: 8 Neutral
Group:
Senior Members
Active Posts:
360 (0.29 per day)
Most Active In:
Medical Science (108 posts)
Joined:
29-December 08
Profile Views:
5,746
Last Active:
User is offline Yesterday, 04:58 PM
Currently:
Offline

My Information

Member Title:
Baryon
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender:
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me

Topics I've Started

  1. target drugs or gene therapy

    Yesterday, 04:57 PM

    What are target drugs or gene therapy that doctors are working in the future use for cancer and other diseases?

    I hear talk of hope in the future that target drugs or gene therapy may be used for cancer and other diseases
  2. Canada could play key role in new space race to the moon

    1 March 2012 - 06:56 PM

    Quote

    Canada could play key role in new space race to the moon


    Canada could play a key role in a new space race to the moon -- one that might be described as an extra-terrestrial gold rush.

    Industry insiders will be watching closely this week as the heads of the world's five biggest space agencies meet in Quebec City.

    The five partners on the International Space Station will discuss the future of the orbiting space lab.

    But they'll also address what's becoming a hot topic -- mining on the moon.



    Read about here http://www.inews880....aspx?ID=1660595

    I have 3 questions


    1.How will space mining be profitable when going into space is so costly ?


    2. Putting people or payload in space is extremely costly


    3.How are they going to get in space go to China or Russia? ( NASA does not put people or payload in space any more ).
  3. Medical isotopes possible without a nuclear reactor

    23 February 2012 - 11:04 AM

    Quote

    Medical isotopes possible without a nuclear reactor

    VANCOUVER—Canadian scientists say they have developed a technique to produce medical isotopes in hospitals and clinics without the need for a nuclear reactor.

    The announcement, on the final day of the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual meeting in Vancouver, could signal the end to a crisis that has shaken up the medical community, politicians in Ottawa, and patients throughout Canada.

    Two ageing nuclear reactors produce about 75 per cent of the global supply of medical isotopes. One of them, the reactor in Chalk River, Ont., about 180 kilometres north of Ottawa, produces 40 per cent of the supply of the raw materials needed to produce the isotopes.

    But the era of dependency on nuclear reactors in the production of isotopes is over, said Tom Ruth, senior scientist at TRIUMF, the national laboratory for particle and nuclear physics based in Vancouver.

    “It’s clearly a financial issue with the government as they don’t want to invest more money into the existing reactor (at Chalk River),” he said Monday.

    By upgrading equipment already stored in a dozen hospital basements across Canada, the scientists say they can manufacture the isotopes with out the nuclear component.



    Read more here http://www.thestar.c...ar-reactor?bn=1


    What are isotopes and why are isotopes needed?
  4. Michael Moore’s $2M hypocrite house: film director lives like the 1% he condemns

    23 February 2012 - 10:53 AM

    Quote

    Michael Moore’s $2M hypocrite house: film director lives like the 1% he condemns.



    It’s no secret that Moore has made millions from his muckraking documentaries, and there’s no reason he shouldn’t have. As one of the most successful documentary film-makers ever, he’s successfully tapped a rich vein of anti-capitalist rhetoric that sells well among U.S. liberals.



    http://fullcomment.n...ypocrite-house/


    Yap he is saying he is for the people but look it all fake.
  5. Seniors at risk of catching infections in emergency departments: study

    23 January 2012 - 10:49 PM

    Quote

    TORONTO - Hospital emergency rooms can cure what ails an elderly person, but they can also send them home with an unwanted souvenir of their visit.

    A new study suggests emergency departments may be a source of infections for seniors who turn to them for care, and a potential starting point for some of the infectious outbreaks that make their way through long-term care facilities.

    Researchers from Montreal and Riviere-du-loup, Que., and from Toronto looked at seniors living in long-term care, comparing infection rates among those who had been recently treated in an emergency department and those who had not.

    They found those who had been to Emerg were nearly four times more likely to have a respiratory or gastrointestinal infection in the week after the hospital visit than seniors who had not been to the hospital.

    Lead author Dr. Caroline Quach put it another way: There were 8.3 infections per 1,000 patient days in seniors upon their return from the emergency department compared to 3.4 infections per 1,000 patient days in those who didn't go to Emerg.



    Read here http://www.winnipegf...-137895558.html



    How can this happen in today in this time with top standards ? I can see 100 or 150 years ago but not today.

Friends

nec209 hasn't added any friends yet.

Comments

nec209 has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?