MonDie Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I've read much psychological discussion on Dr Badcocks blog on PsychologyToday. However, given that Badcock and Crespi's imprinted brain theory recently recieved some strong support (below), I would like to know more about the theory's biological underpinnings. Opposite risk patterns for autism and schizophrenia are associated with normal variation in birth size: phenotypic support for hypothesized diametric gene-dosage effects. What are imprinted genes? How could they make such general inferences about paternal-maternal baises in gene expression or silencing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now