Robittybob1 Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 (edited) As the Earth formed and prior to the iron catastrophe the density of the matter would be more even throughout so the accretion would be at the equatorial region as has been suggested previously in this thread. That is certainly a novel idea and has seldom been argued before. http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/88621-nonspherical-earth-split-from-centrifugal-forces/page-2#entry863929 Edited April 19, 2015 by Robittybob1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavelcherepan Posted April 19, 2015 Share Posted April 19, 2015 As the Earth formed and prior to the iron catastrophe the density of the matter would be more even throughout so the accretion would be at the equatorial region as has been suggested previously in this thread. That is certainly a novel idea and has seldom been argued before. I haven't noticed that idea coming up, but I can't see how it's viable, anyway. How would you explain preferential accretion at the equator? This doesn't make sense statistically and maybe that's the reason it hasn't been argued before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts