hoola Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 (edited) if the universe is a mathematical object, what could be a formulation of a containment of such an object? If the source of the data that writes the universe is the algorithm PI, and that the running calculations are not only functioning forward from the beginning 3.14... but are back-calculated from the most recent calculation happening at each present moment, towards the original digit, what could be a result? This would be similar as the equation also read backward with each iteration forward. This occurring constantly and since the beginning of time, might create a mathematical wave-flux interference pattern, and upon reaching some critical density, could in some sense create this or some potential universe. If so, then the boundaries of the universe(s) are on one end, 3.14... and the ever-expanding end "edges" are the latest digits of PI ...as two parallel "mirrors" flying apart. This could explain the acceleration and how space could expand forever (or as long as the calculation continues in the forward direction), never be infinite and how there is no real center or edge in a classic physical sense...If PI were to end due to completion, or repetition, then the universe may still exist, but expansion might stop. This also might explain one part of entanglement, in that the particles are of similar data makeup, but link up in opposite " write-directions", causing them to be of always opposite spins, yet synced together in their current segments of PI expressions within the Flux Cloud due to their initial close association. When entanglement is broken, each particle will diverge into it's opposite direction of calculation, freed of the restriction of synchronization until becoming entangled with some other particle and becomes "data specific" to it, at some opposite but equal iteration sets, positioned between two counter-calculated threads of the Flux Cloud. This is not to infer that time ever moves backward, only that back-calculations constantly occur within the sequence in real (forward) time. Edited January 4, 2015 by hoola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recursion Posted January 4, 2015 Share Posted January 4, 2015 if the universe is a mathematical object, what could be a formulation of a containment of such an object? If the source of the data that writes the universe is the algorithm PI, and that the running calculations are not only functioning forward from the beginning 3.14... but are back-calculated from the most recent calculation happening at each present moment, towards the original digit, what could be a result? This would be similar as the equation also read backward with each iteration forward. This occurring constantly and since the beginning of time, might create a mathematical wave-flux interference pattern, and upon reaching some critical density, could in some sense create this or some potential universe. If so, then the boundaries of the universe(s) are on one end, 3.14... and the ever-expanding end "edges" are the latest digits of PI ...as two parallel "mirrors" flying apart. This could explain the acceleration and how space could expand forever (or as long as the calculation continues in the forward direction), never be infinite and how there is no real center or edge in a classic physical sense...If PI were to end due to completion, or repetition, then the universe may still exist, but expansion might stop. This also might explain one part of entanglement, in that the particles are of similar data makeup, but link up in opposite " write-directions", causing them to be of always opposite spins, yet synced together in their current segments of PI expressions within the Flux Cloud due to their initial close association. When entanglement is broken, each particle will diverge into it's opposite direction of calculation, freed of the restriction of synchronization until becoming entangled with some other particle and becomes "data specific" to it, at some opposite but equal iteration sets, positioned between two counter-calculated threads of the Flux Cloud. This is not to infer that time ever moves backward, only that back-calculations constantly occur within the sequence in real (forward) time. I understand what you're attempting to do. There is no way to understand it in its entirety from a material perspective, as you ignore sentience. In order to understand the construction of manifest reality, you have to also understand the construction of thought and truth, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoola Posted January 4, 2015 Author Share Posted January 4, 2015 (edited) the construction of manifest reality allows sentience to occur at certain points under certain conditions. Thank you for the good comment, but I don't consciously ignore sentience....only that it is described information, and that allows for it's potential expression. I see the maths not only describing physical laws, but also many meanings and truths. but not all. The wheel is still in spin. I see the universe as using sentience to puzzle out how things came to exist. In reverse order of expressions I see....... Math supported by logic, logic assembled from chaos, chaos supplied by the void's initial single bit of proto-information. That is, of one (1) void. The only bit of information possible in a void is that there was "1 void".....With no logic or math (yet) to describe that "1" implies that an "impetus without form" existed, and the extant universe is the process of constructing that form....to resolve that impetus. When we as individuals were born, we had no knowledge of how we came to be. I see the universe in the same position, and reality as it has come to be seen as partially sentient, with us as some of those pieces, in an overall attempt to understand the "why anything" question.. and by doing so give meaning to existence itself by "doing work" in one particular aspect of sentient abilitiy, even if that prior realm is never fully ascertained. I see a major problem with the analysis of prior BB events due to this "firewall" of information construction... Edited January 4, 2015 by hoola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoola Posted January 5, 2015 Author Share Posted January 5, 2015 (edited) to continue with your mentioning of understanding thought and truth, my model describes all information within the universe, including thoughts and truths. I see the universe driven by 2 types of information, logical and illogical. The physical universe is composed from the logical component, and the illogic component can now be expressed via sentience, from a domain previously hidden. Since the algorithm PI is still describing new information, the logic component allows for the expansion, and the illogical component allows for new thinking to be expressed via sentience. Any thought or truth we may conceive is discovered data from the driver, and our success is only in having the ability to access it. This places a limit on free will, albeit a very liberal one. I see a reason why we are yet to see aliens visiting the earth, as all sentient beings are bound to have to pass the test of not destroying themselves with their new ability, so high intelligence has a built in limiting factor, the " Edward Teller" paradox, with additional risks to animate life on earth, vastly exaggerated by the new abilities ...this self destructive aspect of sentience has a rough analogy to the property of material entropy... Edited January 6, 2015 by hoola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now