mcompengr Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 [(Abstract preciously posted.)] Introductions Before the beginning there was no "stuff", only space and time. So, space says to time: "How long have you been here?" and time says: "How long have I been where?" Time had to be first. It is simplest, having no traits, and something had to make existence logically possible by existing. Time also makes "difference" and "measurement" possible, but with everything the same and there being nothing to measure anyway. Space has many traits, and could even make both "quantum" and "difference" possible physically, not just logically. It likewise would need nothing for existence, not even time. All else would need both space and time for existence, and it certainly would be a phenomenal phenomenon that could provide for its own prerequisites. If the pre-bang vacuum-space already had something in it, it could be build into space or ancient, leftover residue from other, previous Big Bangs. GUT/TOE vs. UFT "Although your world wonders me, with your majestic and superior clacking hen, your people I do not understand, and so to you I will put an end." -Jimi Hendrix, Third Stone From the Sun. (Question: Is SETI ready?) A unified field theory would cover our universe only, like back when multi-universes were thought of less. While a complete, single-universe theory should include a clear, physical interface to a possible "multiverse", or rule it out utterly, it need only explain our reality. GUT/TOEs it seems are supposed to have our universe knowable in relation to somewhat knowable others. They would need to describe the entire cosmos, with nothing even theoretical left out. One thing is sure, if data shows that another universe exists then communication has happened, and if those in the other universe could modulate their "existence data" then who knows what? But dread not,this is just about a simple, one universe theory. Even with pre-existent, infinite spatial extent, it hopes only to find unity among all of the well examined theories, which seem sufficient unto the task. It's all up front, and of course it is a "synthetic statement" (Barrow, p.237). But, with a shape for space, and a prime, fundamental process proposed for the bottom. That followed by amateur speculation on its implications with perspectives on data from the bibliography. The focus is on real and physical, looking for the mechanism behind what is. In the interest of integrity, it was decided that an attempt ought to be made to offer an integrated something (anything) on all major issues. Candidates for redaction are bracketed [( thusly )]. Some terse vernacular is employed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 ! Moderator Note Please have a re-read of the guidelines to posting in speculations and then post a more substantive elaboration of your idea. Please try to avoid the vernacular, terse or otherwise, and stick to easily understood scientific language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 [(Abstract preciously posted.)] Is that a typo for "previously"? If so, where? If not, what do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfmotat Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Is that a typo for "previously"? If so, where? If not, what do you mean? "Preciously" makes him sound like Gollum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcompengr Posted December 9, 2014 Author Share Posted December 9, 2014 "Preciously" makes him sound like Gollum. My hero after Keith Ledger's Joker. Fraudian three ways by accident! I appoloqize for my disgusting condition, and I will not inflict myself upon you any further. -Martian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted December 10, 2014 Share Posted December 10, 2014 My hero after Keith Ledger's Joker. Fraudian three ways by accident! I appoloqize for my disgusting condition, and I will not inflict myself upon you any further. -Martian Precision is important in science - and in many other walks of life - so I will just mention that it was Heath Ledger's Joker, the Austrian founder of psychoanalysis was Sigmund Freud thus the "Freudian Slip" is the parapraxis that seems like an accident but is in fact an artifact of the un/subconscious, and apologize has only one P and no Qs. And I am guessing your name is Martin and that you are not a native of the red planet. We really do welcome discussion and new ideas - but do us a favour and re-read your text before hitting the big black "Post" button Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now