wlad

Missed z-axis in the current nuclear models

Recommended Posts

According to the current nuclear models, the even-even nuclei must have two sort of shapes:

A- Spherical shape – when the quantity of prótons Z is the same of the quantity of neutrons N, Z=N.

B- Elispoidal shape – when Z << N .

But experiments have shown that some even-even nuclei with Z<< N are pear shaped.
Then, how to justify it? After all, they would have to have an ellipsoidal shape.


In 2013 the Professor Peter Butler of the University of Liverpool had proposed that nucleons (prótons and neutrons) are distributed within the nuclei around a z-axis. So, in order to justify why some even-even with Z<<N (as for instance 88Ra224) have pear shape, he proposed the existence of a z-axis within the nuclei.
Look the z-axis proposed by Professor Butler for the 88Ra224 in the link:
http://news.liv.ac.uk/2013/05/09/scientists-demonstrate-pear-shaped-atomic-nuclei/



A NEW HYPOTHESIS: THE EXISTENCE OF A 5th FORCE IN NATURE:

In order to explain the pear shape of Ra224, some theorists are now even supposing the existence of a 5th force in nature, which actuation is different for protons and neutrons, and by this way they expect to explain why protons and neutrons have different distribution in even-even nuclei.



On the existence of the z-axis by considering physical causes (missing in the current nuclear models):

In the paper No. 10 of the book Quantum Ring Theory ( intitled CRITIQUE TO THE MODELS OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS ) it is shown that the existence of the z-axis within the nuclei is suggested by four different nuclear properties of the nuclei.

They are:

1st nuclear property - Null nuclear spin for even-even nuclei with Z=N.

2nd nuclear property - Null magnetic moment for even-even nuclei with Z=N

3rd nuclear property - Emission of alpha particles by uranium nucleus U238 with null angular moment

4th nuclear property - Incompatibility between current Nuclear Theory and the electric quadrupole moment of some nuclei

In the paper No. 13, entitled BETA-DECAY, it is shown that the existence of the z-axis is also suggested by a fifth nuclear property:

5th nuclear property - the preferential emission of the electron in the Wu’s experiment: the beta-decay of 27Co60 (WRONGLY interpreted by the nuclear theorists as a violation of the parity in the beta-decay).

Therefore, according to Quantum Ring Theory, there are five different nuclear phenomena suggesting the existence of the z-axis within the nuclei.

And now in the beggining of 2013 the experiment published in the journal Nature points out the need to consider a 6th nuclear property suggesting the existence of the z-axis:

6th nuclear property - the pear shaped nucleus Ra224.


CONCLUSIONS:
As we see, the Heisenberg’s phantasmagoric scientific method had introduced many serious inconsistences in the Nuclear Physics, as the conclusion that the Nature has preference by the left direction (the direction of the electron in the Wu’s experiment), the violation of the parity in the beta-decay, and the time reversion (a wrong interpretation by Christenson in 1964, when he and collaborators analysed the decay of the mesons K).

In the paper entitled A New Model of the Neutron published in Quantum Ring Theory it is shown that a model of nêutron formed by próton+electron does not violate the conservation of parity, as the nuclear physicists believed along the whole 20th Century, because when the electron loses its helical trajectory (due to its partnership with the próton within the structure of the nêutron) the electron loses its spin 1/2. Such mechanism of the spin lost within the nêutron is also responsible for a wrong interpretation by the nuclear theorists, because they believed that the parity is violated in in the beta-decay.

In the page 92 of the book Quantum Ring Theory it is written:

As we realize, because the physicists did not discover that the addition of spins is (seemingly) violated they transferred the problem for the parity. Instead of: “the addition of spins is violated in the beta-decay”, they say: “the parity is not kept in the beta-decay”.



The five nuclear phenomena which suggest the existence of the z-axis are described between the pages 125 and 131 of the paper Critique to the Models of Nuclear Physics, and between the pages 158 and 161 of the paper Beta-Decay, and they are exhibited ahead:

Page 125:

post-102616-0-55963400-1386630468_thumb.jpg


Page 126:
post-102616-0-62323200-1386630497_thumb.jpg

Page 127:
post-102616-0-16190500-1386630517_thumb.jpg

Page 129:
post-102616-0-94656200-1386630535_thumb.jpg

Page 130:
post-102616-0-14648900-1386630563_thumb.jpg

 

 

Page 131:
post-102616-0-01914100-1386630596_thumb.jpg

Page 133:
post-102616-0-52178100-1386630652_thumb.jpg




CONCLUSIONS IN THE PAPER “BETA-DECAY”:

Page 160:
post-102616-0-89477100-1386630681_thumb.jpg


Page 161:
post-102616-0-05384200-1386630698_thumb.jpg


Page 125:

post-102616-0-81558400-1386636790_thumb.jpg


Page 126:
post-102616-0-31596000-1386636817_thumb.jpg

Page 127:
post-102616-0-25253900-1386636842_thumb.jpg

Page 129:
post-102616-0-65970400-1386636867_thumb.jpg

Page 130:

post-102616-0-13579000-1386636910_thumb.jpg

 

Page 131:
post-102616-0-31806500-1386636942_thumb.jpg

Page 133:
post-102616-0-31807800-1386636974_thumb.jpg




CONCLUSIONS IN THE PAPER “BETA-DECAY”:

Page 160:
post-102616-0-75060300-1386637006_thumb.jpg


Page 161:

post-102616-0-55857300-1386637033_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

Due to the non-mainstream nature of this thread, it has been moved to Speculations. Please take the time to read the rules that govern this section.

 

I did not know that the journal Nature is publishing speculations.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those people who like to postulate new ideas in the realm of science, or perhaps just make things up for fun. Whatever the case is, this forum is not a home for just any science-related idea you have. It has a few rules:

Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can.

 

Speculation is actually this:

 

1- to suppose that the z-axis in the nuclei is due to a 5th force of the nature

 

2- the Supersymmetry (Susy), not confirmed by experiments

 

3- String theory, not confirmed by experiments

 

 

Unlike, the existence of the z-axis was predicted in my book Quantum Ring Theory published in 2006, seven years before the publication of the paper published in 2013 by the journal Nature.

 

Like the non-spherical shape of even nuclei with Z=N also had been predicted in my book Quantum Ring Theory, six years before the publication by the journal Nature of the paper How atomic nuclei cluster , in 2012 ( with the plagiarism of my argument proposed in the page 137 of my book, where it is explained why the even-even nuclei with Z=N have null quadrupole moment (in spite of they have non-spherical shape, the same argument used by the authors of the paper How atomic nuclei cluster)

 

page 137:

post-102616-0-96821000-1386642234_thumb.jpg

 

How atomic nuclei cluster

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v487/n7407/full/nature11246.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

!

Moderator Note

 

Wlad

 

a. please do not respond to Moderation with the thread. Responses will be split off to the trash can.

 

b. it is speculative

 

c. this is not a soapbox for you to unilaterally expound your theory and vent your frustrations with the scientific publishing houses.

 

Either approach the forums in the normal manner - ie with the expectation of debate, questions and answer, counterclaims, and explanations; or do not bother. Posting 20 photostatted pages in order to show precedence in an idea is not really in line with our forum's purpose. Please stick to discussing the idea - that is if other want to discuss it - and avoid soapboxing and claims of plagiarism; SFN is just not the place for you to make these accusations. Any further accusations will be vetted by staff and possibly removed.

 


!

Moderator Note

 

Actually, after reading Captain Panic's mod note here I think there is good reason to lock this thread down as well.

 

Thread suspended pending review

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.