Some confusion surrounds the topic of Absolute Vacuums.
Most folk are really talking about 'empty space', which is a misnomer. Space is not empty. In this context, the word "hollow" is appropriate, and can be applied to this type of space, as in "A space with nothing in it."
An absolute Vacuum is quite different. It is a "Volume with no space in it"
From the microcosm to the macrocosm, Absolute Vacuums have never been directly observed in space. Even the thinnest intergalactic space consists of radiation, virtual particles, whole atoms. From its distinct observational absence, many would infer that Absolute Vacuums do not exist, but that is an assumption and an erroneous one, in my opinion.
An Absolute Vacuum cannot be directly observed because of the imposition it has on conventional space. We may only observe the volume surrounding it, and the behavior of that surrounding space.
The Absolute Vacuum itself is a singularity in that we can only speculate, but never know what occurs on the other side of the volume. I would speculate that within such a volume the concept of time and temperature are meaningless. In the short video below, one section concerns itself with a thought model that goes some way to explaining the nature of the Absolute Vacuum, and its imposition on space.
An Empty Sun - Is Gravity being Induced?
Best,
Stephen Goodfellow
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
gfellow on gravity
#2 29 January 2012 - 07:08 PM
!
Moderator Note
gfellow, please only reply to other peoples threads with mainstream accepted science. If you wish to discuss your own ideas open a new thread in speculations.
Please do not reply to this modnote. And it would be appreciated if no one replied to gfellow's post here.
Klaynos - share and enjoy.
- Posts: 6,801 | Joined: 19-November 04
Reply
#3 29 January 2012 - 08:06 PM
Klaynos, on 29 January 2012 - 07:08 PM, said:
[modnote] gfellow, please only reply to other peoples threads with mainstream accepted science. If you wish to discuss your own ideas open a new thread in speculations.
Please do not reply to this modnote. And it would be appreciated if no one replied to gfellow's post here.[/modnote]
Please do not reply to this modnote. And it would be appreciated if no one replied to gfellow's post here.[/modnote]
I'm sorry - a nubie on this forum. I thought I was posting to
<li class="first" style="background-color: rgb(228, 234, 242); margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; float: left; font-size: 0.9em; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(135, 135, 135); ">Science Forums<li style="background-color: rgb(228, 234, 242); margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; float: left; font-size: 0.9em; color: rgb(135, 135, 135); ">> Other Topics<li style="background-color: rgb(228, 234, 242); margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; float: left; font-size: 0.9em; color: rgb(135, 135, 135); ">> Speculations
I would be most appreciative if you would place my posting in the appropriate location, and if you feel it does not merit placement, please discard.
-S-
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
- Posts: 20 | Joined: 29-January 12
Reply
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!











