[michel123456]

Aargh, I am 500 years too late.I rediscovered Galileo!
look here "Galileo's rejection of the possibility of velocity changing uniformly with respect to distance"
http://www.jstor.org/pss/226890
and
http://books.google....%20body&f=false

---------------------
And the most interseting is this:
If it is true that a single object cannot modify its state of motion in such a manner that velocity is proportional to distance, it means that Hubble's law is a demonstration that the objects were never in the same state of motion.

This post has been edited by michel123456: 20 January 2012 - 06:46 PM

[michel123456]

Because I have a parallel conversation with someone else out of the Forum, who has deep objections.

the basic equation of velocity proportional to distance is
V=kD
where V velocity, D distance, k constant of proportionality.
And here below 3 diagrams for k=1, k=2, k=3







As you can notice, the points are always horizontal.
The difference in time=zero ==> it is not possible for a single object to have such a state of motion: velocity proportional to distance is impossible for a single object.
.

This post has been edited by michel123456: 21 January 2012 - 08:10 PM

[michel123456]

edited.

This post has been edited by michel123456: 21 January 2012 - 08:10 PM