Science Forums: SETI and prime numbers - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

SETI and prime numbers Rate Topic: -----

#21 Greg Boyles 


Molecule

View Postimatfaal, on 9 December 2011 - 06:40 PM, said:

Morris Code - nope lost me there (morse?) - the whole point of using primes is that we cannot at present see it as anything but artificial and with an intelligence behind it - most mathematical sequences could be natural


You all keep saying this, but no one has cited an example of any specific natural process generating any form of number sequence.

Some of you have only cited generalities like the 'number of tranmitters doubling' etc.

This post has been edited by Greg Boyles: 10 December 2011 - 08:04 AM

0

#22 Schrödinger's hat 


Icon
Psychic Sexpert

View PostGreg Boyles, on 10 December 2011 - 08:03 AM, said:

You all keep saying this, but no one has cited an example of any specific natural process generating any form of number sequence.

Some of you have only cited generalities like the 'number of tranmitters doubling' etc.


My logic was more along these lines:

Simple equations pop up in nature easily
Sequences related to exponentials can be generated by simple equations
If we want to avoid being mistaken for a natural event, we should avoid such sequences

Something else relevant:

Pulsars emit radiation on various bands in an extremely regular manner. There was some speculation when the first radio pulsars were found that they might be some kind of signal.


For something a bit more complicated/speculative, consider a pulsar that was losing rotational energy to its environment at a rate proportional to its speed -- something that happens in small scale phenomena, quite a lot. I don't know the exact situation for a real pulsar, and in our observations this process is very slow, but this is a plausible for the type of thing you'd see naturally (if not a specific example).

It would be governed by the equation \frac{d\omega}{dt} = A\omega
Which has the solution \omega = e^{At}
As such the time between the pulses would be a geometric series.(something along the lines of 1 2 4 etc, but more likely 1, 1.0324, 1.0324^2, and so on)

For anything more specific you'd probably have to talk to someone who does a lot of radio astronomy.

This post has been edited by Schrödinger's hat: 10 December 2011 - 08:22 AM

I don't believe in free will, but I choose to pretend it exists. If I'm helpful press the green button--->
0

#23 Greg Boyles 


Molecule

View PostSchrödinger, on 10 December 2011 - 08:18 AM, said:

My logic was more along these lines:

Simple equations pop up in nature easily
Sequences related to exponentials can be generated by simple equations
If we want to avoid being mistaken for a natural event, we should avoid such sequences

Something else relevant:

Pulsars emit radiation on various bands in an extremely regular manner. There was some speculation when the first radio pulsars were found that they might be some kind of signal.


For something a bit more complicated/speculative, consider a pulsar that was losing rotational energy to its environment at a rate proportional to its speed -- something that happens in small scale phenomena, quite a lot. I don't know the exact situation for a real pulsar, and in our observations this process is very slow, but this is a plausible for the type of thing you'd see naturally (if not a specific example).

It would be governed by the equation \frac{d\omega}{dt} = A\omega
Which has the solution \omega = e^{At}
As such the time between the pulses would be a geometric series.(something along the lines of 1 2 4 etc, but more likely 1, 1.0324, 1.0324^2, and so on)

For anything more specific you'd probably have to talk to someone who does a lot of radio astronomy.


Pulsars emit an unvarying pattern of energy pulses. Even a pulsar whose rotation is slowing would not emit pulses that could not be interpreted as numbers.

A number sequence would require the pattern of pulses to be significantly irregular in same way so that it makes it possible to delineate one number from the next in the sequence. A slowing pulsar would not generate suffient irregularity as far as I can see.
0

#24 Tres Juicy 


Molecule

View PostAirbrush, on 8 December 2011 - 08:01 PM, said:

A series of prime numbers is not the only way an ETI could signal their existence. (BTW, why would they? It's like saying "Here we are, come and bother us.")

Many mathematical number sequences could do the same job, such as some kind of Morris Code.



(BTW, why would they? It's like saying "Here we are, come and bother us.")

Um.... Thats what we did...
A fencing instructor named Fisk
In duels was terribly brisk
So much that in action
The Fitzgerald contraction
Reduced his foil to a disk

Like all good science, I pose more questions than I answer

Spoiler
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users