Science Forums: Relativity of locality - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Relativity of locality Rate Topic: -----

#1 17 November 2011 - 01:56 PM questionposter 


Primate
So light's frequency is relative, so does that mean light is both most likely to exist in a certain area and also NOT likely to exist in the same area? How can the physical space light occupies be relative? Because to one thing light can be a gamma ray and to another thing it can be a radio wave, but those two wavelengths have different localization patterns. So just because I measure something, it automatically determines the physical space that it exists in for my point of view?

This post has been edited by questionposter: 17 November 2011 - 01:58 PM

0

#2 17 November 2011 - 03:20 PM User is online  swansont 


Icon
Shaken, not Stirred
The length you would measure in two frames is not the same.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum

Stop failing the Turing test!

My SFN blog: Swans on Tea

To release the hounds, click the [+] sign ->
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users