difference between a point charge and a test charge
Posted 12 March 2007 - 06:49 PM
When dealing with electric potential, my book gives one equation when dealing with a test charge:
and one when dealing with a point charge:
Why is there a difference between the two?
Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:43 PM
Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posted 12 March 2007 - 08:25 PM
EPE is just the electric potential energy. But I think I get what you're saying, the difference is a point charge creates and electric field, and a test charge, with negligible charge is placed into an electric field to measure the electric force that acts on the test charge itself, right?
Right. The test charge can be used to map out any field from any configuration, e.g. the ~constant field inside the plates of a capacitor. The point charge is one specific configuration, though you can use superposition to construct any situation from a collection of point charges.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum To shake my vodka martini, click the up arrow ^
I am not a minimum-wage government shill
My SFN blog: Swans on Tea
Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:32 PM
Ok, so just to add: In this case you can see the 1st equation as the definition of what the electic potential is supposed to be: The potential energy a test charge would have normalized to the test charge's electric charge. The 2nd equation tells you how to actually calculate this potential from a given charge distribution (potentials from different charges just add up, so you can calculate the potential for arbitrary charge distributions, as Swansont mentioned).
EPE is just the electric potential energy.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users