QM and GR unification (split from what is GR?)

[univeral theory]

We do not actually know the set of all possible solutions to this problem.

 

 

So I was thinking of another possible approach- which the “cost-benefit analysis” can offer to the unification of QM and GR. This will be applied to the phenomena and the model framework of predicting this phenomenon by QM and GM when reconciled with reference to the phenomena. C B A tool is quite popular in social sciences (say economics) for identifying the most appropriate choice from two or more competing alternatives(say A and B)from which we have to derive one desired alternative(say C). and its relevance extends to other sciences where two or more true alternative ideas are found to be in conflict with one another on the same phenomena to which they “can” all claim to be relevant.

 

In this approach, QM and GR will be subject to C³=R (compromise, compare and contrast = reconciliation) mechanism. No any form of compromise will be admitted on the model framework of either GR or QM unless its marginal benefit is as great as or greater than the marginal cost of their reconciliation especially when compared and contrasted to the framework of the phenomena they are predicting.

 

This mechanism will use simple logical tools of;

1-What if A or B was C (which definitely will be applied relevant to the phenomena with relevant logical explanation), could QM reconcile with GR?

 

2-What if QM compromises A for GR or GR compromises B for QM, can QM reconcile with GR?

 

NB; we do not expect certainly correct models since this is a research subject. But at least we expect relevant models with a reasonable degree of scientific proof from which we shall construct the most economical way of reconciling QM and GR. And baseless answers are expected to be falsified to safe guard what we are predicting.

 

This way we shall be going. If this can make any kind of sense,

please supplement or correct this proposal or else press granted and I shall

shoot the breeze.

[Markus Hanke]

NB; we do not expect certainly correct models since this is a research subject. But at least we expect relevant models with a reasonable degree of scientific proof from which we shall construct the most economical way of reconciling QM and GR. And baseless answers are expected to be falsified to safe guard what we are predicting.

 

Yes, I agree, and that is currently our problem. The domain of quantum gravity is far beyond the reach of any experimental setup which we can conceive of. This may change in the future, but it's what we are up against right now.

[univeral theory]

Yes, I agree,

Supposing we accept to interpret QM from the non local hidden variable point of view, this implies that E=MC² will be the inertial frame of energy and from the non inertial frame point of view,E=1/3MV².

 

The trajectory of events is caused by the curvature of the speed of consciousness through which the relative frames of quantum gravity attain their inertial mass. the speed of consciousness which is ∂X²/t where X is energy conserved in spontaneous

symmetry breaking ((ħ /1/+ . - (√ ħ) )=1) causes time to dilate. no more space than that of a vacuum and time is no longer the

pressure of clock but Time is the cycle range of massive reaction per a unit of its actions. (now clock becomes a mechanism of predicting time but it does not determine time. and for the dimension of time, it becomes a universal dimension that ranges between zero and relative infinity).

 

the trajectory of events is then determined through a two dimensional framework of their contraction,three dimensional framework of their expansion and four dimensional framework of their universality.

 

If iam not wrong, the interpretation above has only affected the interpretation variables of QM and GR, but has not affected the variables of the phenomena they predict. Remember this is just the beginning!

 

So here we go; what if this was the interpretation of QM and GR,can QM reconcile with GR?

Edited May 27, 2013 by univeral theory

[Markus Hanke]

I am afraid you are using too much non-standard terminology for me to give any meaningful reply; I quite simply have no idea what you are trying to say.

[univeral theory]

I am afraid you are using too much non-standard terminology for me to give any meaningful reply; I quite simply have no idea what you are trying to say.

point them out for me to do some corrections.

[Markus Hanke]

point them out for me to do some corrections.

 

Take the first sentence for example :

 

The trajectory of events is caused by the curvature of the speed of consciousness through which the relative frames of quantum gravity attain their inertial mass.

 

This is without any meaning.

[univeral theory]

I quite simply have no idea what you are trying to say.

i apreciate your concern markus; and here is a more explained trial with some corrections in the pointed out problem area.

 

 

We all hold this physical truth; that energy is energy- no more, no less. And that the universe is energy at action-reaction system. But then why is it that the universe is not made up of the same objects with the same actions, reactions,size, shape, behavior, colors, etc? The answer is self evident that even though energy is constant due to its conservation, but its amount is subject to the relative frames of its measurements, which is (√E)- . + (or as they shall be represented by letter S in this discussion) thus; E/+ .-(√E) = E. Where; E is energy.

 

With conservation, energy remains constant. And this is calculated by E/+ .-(√E)=E. Where; E/+ .-(√E) is the framework of energy. But due to the difference in the relative frames of measuring this conserved energy as a function of observation (speed of consciousness), its framework can be measured differently. Such that, E/+ .-(√E)= MQ², where ‘Q²’ is the speed of consciousness and ‘M’ is mass. And thus; E/S = E/+ .-(√E) = MQ² = E. Speed of consciousness and mass are the basic relative frames through which energy is measured.

 

What is thenegative of energy and what is its positive?

 

Remember that the positivity and negativity of energy is a relative phenomenon that is based on the framework of conserved energy, a negative energy is that which takes the negative dimension of conservation and in this case it is the speed of consciousness. And a positive energy is that one which takes the positive dimension of conservation and in this case it is mass. Thus;

 

mass: this is the pressure of conserving the constancy of energy due to its quantum action and the framework of this action. Such that; any change in mass is directly proportional to the change in the quantum actions of energy and inversely proportional with in the framework of coordinating theseactions. And thus: M= ħ X ², where M is mass, X is energy conserved with in the framework of spontaneous symmetry breaking and ħ is reduced Planck constant.

That is to say: energy conserved in units of spontaneous symmetry breaking “X” is (ħ /1/+ . -(√ ħ) )=1,

 

 

The speed of conscious: this is the rate of energy cordination and regulation due to the change in the action- reaction system of mass. Such that any change in the speed of consciousness is directly proportional to the change in the quantum action of mass and inversely proportional to the centre of coordinating its reaction–thus Q² = ∂X²/t, where t is time, Q² is speed of consciousness and ∂ is change. thus; ∂X= ∂(ħ /1/- .+(√ ħ) )=1+or-1. Where; ħ is reduced Planckconstant.

 

Time is the cycle range of massive reaction per a unit of its actions. time can be zero t(+.- √t)=0 from the accelerating frame of mass. And time is infinity t(1/(√t)+.-)=infinity from the inertial frames of mass- where t is time. And from the conservation of energy, time is a single dimension whose reaction ranges betwween zero and infinity.

 

Why Q² is the negative of conserved energy and mass is its positive?

 

The implicit coefficient of a complex variable is 1 since multiplying it by 1 does not change the terms of the variable. Thus E=1E. Then our equation of energy turns out to be 1E/+ .-(√1E)= 1E/+1E . -1E = 1E. 0E = E. thus; with in the framework of conserved energy, 1E is the +E and 0E is the –E .

 

Energy with out physical substance is abstract, and from the reference frame of visible energy, abstract energy equals zero energy. When we talk of zero energy (0E), in physical sense it sounds daft, but in conservation of energy it is not flawed. 0E does not mean absolutely no energy at all. But it means that with in the framework of conserved energy, one frame of S is physical while the other is abstract – and the influence of abstract energy can be detected with in the reaction of the physical energy. For an abstract phenomenon to influence physical phenomena is not flawed. Ordinary examples include; dreams that influence physical reaction, abstract visions that influence physical ejaculation, time that influence physical predictions -though it can not be physically detected, consciousness that influence the physical shapes of objects, etc.

 

Remember that, the speed of conscious is the rate of energy coordination and regulation due to the change in the action- reaction system of mass. This implies that Q² is a function of the actions – reaction system of mass. Q² from the reference frame of mass is abstruct energy, so it is 0E = -E. and mass from the reference frame Q² is physical energy and thus +E or 1E .

 

relative frames of energy and the foundation of force

 

Whenever there is a change, there is a cause of that change- and this cause is called a force. A force is any influence that cause changes to a free system/body. But really how does energy become a force to influence its own changes?

 

In mechanics, when two or more relative frames of a given mechanical system confront each other in opposite directions, force is created and change is inevitable. Even though the confrontation between the opposing frames of energy is the foundation of force-as the determiner of changes, but the reaction of this change depends on the pressure. Pressure is the physical quantity that determines the rate, dimensions and magnitude of energy reaction in form of the speed of consciousness.

 

Any mechanical system can regulate its self provided that it is programmed to do so. And any mechanical system can only be programmed to regulate its self through the mechanism of action-reaction. And because the universe is a system of energy at action- reaction, from the reaction of energy point of view; energy can change its form, size, shape, colour, behavior, etc and this explains why the universe is made up.

 

The universe is a mechanical system whose amount of energy is relative to the reference frame of the observer. there are two relative frames through which energy can be predicted(inertial frame and accelarating frame). The pressure of coordinating and regulating the relative frames of energy verses their conservation framework is the fundamental influence of the amount and forms of energy in the universe. Such that; E=MQ² – where, M is mass measured in kilograms and Q² is the speed of consciousness measured in meters of area occupied by massive coordination and regulation per second.

 

E=MQ²: this implies that, with in the relative frame of energy; its amount depends on mass and the speed of consciousness. Where as; with the conservation of energy, mass and speed of consciousness are just different opposite frames of the same energy at its equilibrium framework. Mass is the physical frame of energy (positive frame) and the speed of consciousness is the abstract frame of energy (negative frame). Such that; at the equilibrium frame of M verses Q², energy is conserved in form of quantum gravity. When the speed of consciousness is less than mass, energy is conserved in form of invisible energy. But when the speed of conscious is more than mass, energy is conserved in form of vacuum.

 

Quantum gravity; this is the pressure of conserving energy due to its massive velocity per relative frames of its displacement. At equilibrium frame of massive velocity per displacement, energy is conserved in form of work. At less velocity than displacement; it is in form of black hole. At more velocity than displacement, energy is conserved in form of dark matter. Thus; A =1/3MV² - where A is quantum gravity, M is mass; V is velocity and 1/3 this is the relative basic unit of massive acceleration per the velocity square of mass.

 

Work; is the pressure of conserving the regulation of quantum gravity as a function of acceleration due to gravity and displacement field. At the equilibrium frame of acceleration due to gravity verses displacement field, quantum gravity is conserved in form of electro magnetic force. At less acceleration due to gravity than displacement field,quantum gravity is conserved in form of bosons. And at greater acceleration due to gravity than displacement field, quantum gravity is conserved in form of fermions - thus, W=g.d_f where, g is acceleration due to gravity, d_f is displacement field and W is work.

That is to say; d_f = ∂ (KE /1/(((√ KE)+ .-)∩( KE ((√KE)+ .-)((√ KE)+ .-/ KE) )))=1+or-1.Where; KE is kinetic energy equivalent to MV².

 

Electro magnetic force; is the pressure of conserving the regulation of work due to charge and displacement. At the equilibrium frame of charge and displacement, work is conserved in form of turbulence. At less charge than displacement, work is conserved in form of quarks (magnetic force). At greater charge than displacement, work is conserved in form of leptons (electrical force) - thus U= Y.D², where Y is charge, D is displacement and U is electromagnetic force. That is to say; d²(displacement square of acceleration due to gravity) =

 

 

(9.8/1/(((√9.8)+ . -)∩(9.8 ((√9.8)+ . -)((√9.8)+ . -)/9.8 ) ))=

 

(9.8/1/(-3.130495168 . + 3.130495168 ∩ (0)))=

 

(6.669504832 + 3.130495168 ) = 9.8

 

Remember that;

g = 9.8 m/sec2 for acceleration due to gravity near the surface of the earth,

 

C = 3.0 *108m/sec for the speed of light in vacuum ≈ 3.130495168

 

h = 6.6 * 10-34j sec for plank constant or specifically for quantum action ≈6.669504832

 

And Rab = 0 for the vacuum Einstein equation = 0

 

 

Turbulence; this is the pressure of conserving the regulation of electro-magnetic force as a function of kinetic energy and energy conserved in the framework of explicit symmetry breaking. At the equilibrium frame of energy conserved in the framework of explicit symmetry breaking and kinetic energy, electromagnetic force is in form of atoms. At more kinetic energy than energy conserved in units of explicit symmetry breaking,electromagnetic force is conserved in form of molecules. At more energy conserved in units of explicit symmetry breaking than kinetic energy, electromagnetic force is conserved in form of wave – particles. Thus T_b = KE.K²; where; T_b is turbulence, KE is kinetic energy and K² is energy conserved in the framework of explicit symmetry breaking.

That is to say; “K”= (KE /1/(((√ KE)+ . -)∩( KE ((√KE)+ . -)((√ KE)+ . -/ KE) ) ))=1,

 

 

Reference frames of energy and its measurements

 

The amount of Energy with in a system depends on the action-reaction system of mass and the speed of consciousness through which the action-reaction of mass is cordinated and regulated- and this is what we call E=MQ². From the relative frames of quantum gravity, the minimum amount of energy with in a unit of quantum system is equivalent to E =1/3 MV² . And from the inertial frame of energy, the minimum amount of energy with in a given unit of quantum system is equivalent to E=MC². The trajectory of events is caused by the curvature of the speed of consciousness through which the relative frames of quantum gravity attain their equillibrium. the speed of consciousness which is ∂X²/t where X is energy conserved in spontanious symmetry breaking ((ħ /1/+ . -(√ ħ) )=1) causes time to dilate. the trajectory of events is then determined through a two dimensional framework of massive contraction,three dimensional framework of massive expansion and four dimensional framework of massive conservation (universality).

 

mass and the entanglement of energy

 

Entanglement refers to the correlation between the parts of agiven system. In physics, entanglement can be observed both in classicalmechanics point of view and in quantum mechanics point of view. If we can still remember our difinition of mass that; it is the pressure of conserving the constancy of energy due to its quantum action and the framework of this action. Such that; any change in mass is directly proportional to the change in the quantum actions of energy and inversely proportional with in the framework of coordinating these actions

 

In quantum mechanics, entanglement of energy is popularly referred to as quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement can be defined as the correlation between the regulation of the relative frames of energy with in the same quantum state in form of yin and yang. Such that any change in the yin frame of energy (particle) is directly proportional to the proportionate change in the yang frame of energy (particle). So the speed of quantum entanglement will be equivallent to the speed of 1/3MV².

 

And in classical mechanics; entanglement is popularly observed as the inverse square law. In physics, an inverse-square law is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity…. And if we take the physical quantity of this law as mass and the maximum square of the distance of this mass as the speed of light, then the inverse square law will be equivalent to MC², where M is mass and C² is the speed of light.

 

Turbulence and the Wave - particle

 

Any moving mass creates waves as a form of pressureof its kinetic energy, such that any change in the wave is directly proportional to the change in the kinetic energy of mass and inversely proportional to the centre of its energy conserved in framework of its explicit symmetry breaking; and this is the foundation of wave - particle. Wave particle is equivalent to KE.K²; where; KE is kinetic energy and K² is energy conserved in units of explicit symmetry breaking of kinetic energy. The centre of energy conserved in units of explicit symmetry breaking, is the centre of entangled particles. And the centre of entangled particles is the centre of mass, and the centre of mass is the centre of pressure of the wave and thus the centre of its amplitude. This holds true for atomic particles, subatomic particle and for larger objects. The probability of finding a particle at a particular location is related to the amplitude of the wave associated with the particle. The larger the amplitude of the wave at a particular point, the larger the probability that the particle will be found there and vise versa. In fact, the probability of finding the particle in a particular location is proportional to the square of the amplitude of its wave function.

 

A wave function is a quantum vector field whose behavior can be predicted depending on its non local hidden variables. And according to the pilot wave model, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot_wave‎ “originally developed by Louis de Broglie and further developed by David Bohm into the hidden variable theory proposes that there is no duality, but rather a system exhibits both particle properties and wave properties simultaneously, and particles are guided, in a deterministic fashion, by the pilot wave (or its "quantum potential") which will direct them to areas of constructive interference in preference to areas of destructive interference”.

 

quantum fluctuation and the uncertainty principle

 

All particles in their inertial frame have a precise position and momentum. That is to say; at any equilibrium position of two or more frames of mass accelerating relative to each other with in the same quantum state, their frame is an inertial frame. But due to the difference in the trajectory of these relative frames of mass in their disequilibrium as a function of quantum fluctuation, inertia is lost and the position - momentum of energy at the same time becomes uncertain.

 

When two or more particles of the same quantum state are moving parallel to each other in opposite direction, they form a single quantum vector at their equilibrium coordination and at the disequilibrium this quantum vector superposits to two vectors or more>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

 

 

 

 

Edited May 29, 2013 by univeral theory