Jump to content

Stabilizers


Sidewinder

Recommended Posts

what do you mean by "Stabilisers"?

 

if it`s the passive parts of the plane that don`t move (tail fins) and leading edge on the wings, it gives a resistance for the controls to play against basicly.

the ailerons, rudder, elevators, only play a part in Roll and Yaw, specificaly rudder for yaw and ailerons for roll, elevators for pitch and roll.

 

the stabilisers work during all this to a greater or lesser extent depending on the pitch and yaw.

 

they`re also handy to mount the controls on too :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't it this business of control surfaces that was the real breakthough the Wright brothers made? Other experimenters could have got heavier than air machines of the ground, but with absolutely no control. They figured out the principals that remain in use today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it would if the engines were powerfull enough (Rockets do it all the time), but it would certainly lack manouverability, and Yaw would be out of the question.

what about a slow airplane, let's say a regular single-engine cessna. if the tail fins fall off during flight, is it still able to keep flying? in that matter, if I were to remove the feathers in the back of an arrow, it wouldn't fly straight, so the same thing would happen to an airplane right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, I wouldn`t wanna be on that sucker when that happened!

 

a VERY good pilot would be able to land it, it wouldn`t be impossible and the conditions would have to right.

but steering would have to be done using the brake flaps only (not easy!).

I`m not even sure if single prop cessnas HAVE brake flaps either!

 

I have to ask, What are you thinking about trying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could still steer by banking or leaning the plane sideways and then pulling the nose up but you would lose altitude every time you did it. If there was a cross wind you could not steer into the wind slightly to keep your heading and landing in a cross wind would be a nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to ask' date=' What are you thinking about trying?[/quote']

 

Ha! guess i gave the wrong impression. not really planing anything that crazy yet. this is just out of curiosity, mostly cuz i was watching some footage of the b-2 stealth bomber. that's an airplane that doesn't really have a tail, so how can it fly so well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tail isn't necessary as such. Look at paper planes, or hang gliders. But it greatly increases the stability of the plane, so the pilot doesnt have respond to all the little changes in the airflow around aircraft. Without the tail, flying wings like the B2 need to respond to more of the little changes, otherwise things get rapidly out of hand. In order to rapidly respond to the little changes, computers monitor the flight and automatically change the control surfaces to keep the plane stable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stealth bomber has a v tail which is just a mix of horizontal/vertical. Its not mounted any distance from the lift wings. This makes it rediculously unstable as it always wants to roll forwards or backwards. Its so unstable that its actualy unflyable by pilot alone and has an advanced computer system that keeps it level. When the pilot inputs control the computer just allows the plane instability in the direction the pilot chooses. A lot of modern fighters use this principle as it makes them very manuverable. The plane would pull off some realy stupid manuvers on its own without the computer keeping it steady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, two different stealth bombers here. Though one of them isn't a bomber.

There's the B-2 (Bomber-B) without the tail. It's a flying wing :P

Then there's the F/A-117a (I want to say Nighthalk, but I don't think it's right) which has the V tail. F/A means Fighter/Attack

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Night Hawk.

 

Anyways, if you were to just take the tail off of any normal airplane, it would crash. In planes designed with a tail, the horizontal surfaces hold a role in balancing the plane. Most planes would tip straight forwards, so the elevator actually gives negative lift to keep it from nosing over (the weight of the engine does it) and thus crashing.

The F-16 is remarkable in that the elevator has to provide positive lift rather than negative, giving it remarkable agility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the thing' date=' Richard. The B-2 has no tail stabilizers. It is a wing, and only a wing.

 

B-2 (what we're talking about)

 

F-117a Night Hawk (what you're talking about- note the V tail stabilizers)

 

EDIT- stupid anti-theft devices... It was just a link...

lol Sorry yes I got the wrong one. This one might use thrust vectering.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, the design of the B-2 makes a tail entirely unneccesary. Because it's a wing and the engines and systems are basically centered, it is extremely stable. I've heard testimony that it's impossible to stall- which makes sense, because the forces would re-level the wing before it made the plane stop moving. Turning could be a bit of a problem, but it's workable, and thanks to its stealth it doesn't need to turn fast :P

 

And Cap'n is also right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.