Please read and discuss whether my theory is right and acceptable:

 

Here,

 

Singularity before the Big bang = S

 

Static Universe = sa

 

Big Crunch = bc

 

Unlimited expansion of Universe = eu

 

Matter = M

 

Expanding Energy = EE

 

Gravitational Energy = GE

 

Energy = E

 

 

 

Consider the mass of S = 1kg, then after Big Bang, if 500g becomes EE and 500g becomes M then the GE between the M will pull in 500g where as the same time 500g is pushed by EE. When GE and EE makes an equilibrium, then the universe remains as sa.

 

 

 

Consider the mass of S = 1kg, then after Big Bang, if M becomes more than 500g and EE becomes less than 500g, then the GE between the M pulls more powerful than the pushing of EE. When GE>EE, then the universe will have a bc.

 

 

 

Consider the mass of S = 1kg, then after Big Bang, if M becomes less than 500g and EE becomes more than 500g, then the EE pushes more powerful than the pulling of GE between the M. When EE>GE, then the universe will have an eu.

 

 

 

If the theory of sa and bc is correct, then it should result very before since the Big Bang occurred. But in the case of eu theory, with the help of Edwin Hubble's 'Theory of Expansion of Universe', we can say that the universe is still expanding. But according to the eu theory, universe should only expand if E>M. Therefore, we can find that E was more produced than M during the Big Bang.

I believe this post is a duplicate of one posted with the same title in the Astronomy and Cosmology section. It was moved from there to "Speculations".

 

Chris

Yes but this happenned accidently because i tried to move this topic from here to astronomy and cosmology.