Jump to content

Michio Kaku


brentwise

Recommended Posts

I quite like his book on Quantum Field Theory a Modern introduction. It contains a lot of material and I think would benefit by being used in conjunction with other books, like Ryder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I quite like his book on Quantum Field Theory a Modern introduction. It contains a lot of material and I think would benefit by being used in conjunction with other books, like Ryder.

 

 

I also own that book. There are better books. Zee's Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, and the books of Ryder, Zeidler, Peskin & Schroeder, Weinberg, and Glimm & Jaffe leap to mind.

 

It is the only Kaku book that I own. I will never own two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I also own that book. There are better books. Zee's Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, and the books of Ryder, Zeidler, Peskin & Schroeder, Weinberg, and Glimm & Jaffe leap to mind.

 

Peskin & Schroeder lots of people recommend. Other books I liked include:

 

P. Ramond: Field Theory : A Modern Primer (Frontiers in Physics Series, Vol 74), Westview Press; Second Edition edition (December 21, 2001).

 

C. Nash: Relativistic Quantum Fields, Dover Publications; Unabridged edition (February 17, 2011). (originally 1978).

 

J. Zinn-Justin: Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (International Series of Monographs on Physics), Oxford University Press, USA; 4 edition (August 15, 2002). (Warning: 1074 pages!)

 

 

It is the only Kaku book that I own. I will never own two.

 

Kaku's books on string theory are OK: Introduction to Superstrings and M-Theory (Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics) and Strings, Conformal Fields, and M-Theory (Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics). I have used them before, but again in conjunction with other books. He likes to cover lots of material, but does not always devote enough to details. His books are great for overviews, but I would recommend their use in conjunction with other books. (But then I always find it useful to have more than one book on a topic)

 

The two volumes by Joseph Polchinski come well recommended. I own the two volumes, but I cannot say that I quite get on with Polchinski's style. Still, I would direct the interested reader in this direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I read Hyperspace before. That book inspired me to be a theoretical physicist. Now, he did publish a new book: The Future of the Mind. He introduced concepts like telepathy, telekinesis and quantum consciousness. He combined both neuroscience and physics together, giving us a brand new experience of looking at the universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.