Hello, why not check out

 

http://vixra.org/pdf/0908.0005v1.pdf

 

This very simple theory gives a good match to data (apparent omega(m)=0.25) without dark energy.

 

 

Recent COSMOS/WMAP

 

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.0053v1.pdf

 

especially Figure 12,14 and 15 shows omega(m) approx 0.266

 

John Hunter.

Hello, why not check out

 

http://vixra.org/pdf/0908.0005v1.pdf

 

This very simple theory gives a good match to data (apparent omega(m)=0.25) without dark energy.

 

 

Recent COSMOS/WMAP

 

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0911/0911.0053v1.pdf

 

especially Figure 12,14 and 15 shows omega(m) approx 0.266

 

John Hunter.

 

I have not read it. But if it is good find an expert who will get you endorsed on the arXiv. It will get much more attention there than viXra.

Well, I've read a bit of it but I have to go now. I've never been a big fan of dark matter/energy, but what about experiments to determine if Plank's constant is changing? If as you say the redshift is due to changing Plank's constant, then the change in Plank's constant must be observable.

God how I wish I knew the 'math'!

 

r

God how I wish I knew the 'math'!

 

r

 

I do too