Jump to content

Ideal Gas and IMF


grayfalcon89

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm having hard time convincing myself to two answers from my inorganic chemistry course's last year's exam.

 

1. Which of the following statements are valid concerning ideal gas mixtures:

(there are three choices, two of which make sense to me, but this is the one I disagree)

* Each gas present in the mixture behaves independently of the others.

 

The solution says that it is valid, but I do not agree. Like, in the textbook, it mentioned how oxygen gas would not react with water, but NH3 would readily dissolve in the water - which clearly show that gases like NH3's behaviors are dependent on other molecules. Or, am I reading something into the question? :doh:

 

2. Ethanol (C2H5OH) and dimethyl ether (CH3OCH3) have the same empirical formula but different molecular structures. Based on the IMF, which of the following statements would be predicted to be true?

(there are five choices, but I narrowed down to two)

b) Ether has a higher surface tension than ethanol.

e) Ethanol has a higher enthalpy of vaporization than ether.

 

Main confusion with this problem is that I'm not sure if dimethyl ether can exhibit hydrogen bonding or not. Like, is hydrogen bonding defined as a heteroatom having a lone pair OR is it having a heteroatom with hydrogen attached to it? If it's latter, then I assume that dimethyl ether does not have hydrogen bonding, so its IMF are lower. If not, I don't know how to distinguish them based on IMF.

As far as the choices are concerned, I thought that the higher IMF, the higher surface tension, along with higher MP and higher BP. Isn't this true? I'm not sure how to understand why E is correct.

 

I really attempted them, so hopefully you guys can provide hints to guide me to the right direction (or point out flaws in my reasoning!). Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water vapor and ammonia are not ideal gases. Ideal gases make the assumption that there is no interaction at all between the gas molecules. This is only a model (a flawed one for most cases) but is a good approximation of the noble gases and things like nitrogen or hydrogen, especially at low pressures and high temperatures.

 

Dimethyl ether does not have a hydroxy group. The hydrogens that it possesses are bound to carbons and are essentially nonpolar. Ethanol, however has an OH group, which is polar and can participate appreciably in hydrogen bonding.

 

Think about it. Benzene has hydrogens, but it won't dissolve in water, which has oxygen lone pairs. If the benzene hydrogens could participate in hydrogen bonding, dissolving in water would be quite favorable, but that is clearly not the case.

 

The enthalpy of vaporization of a liquid represents the energy needed to counteract all the IMF in the liquid state added to the energy needed to expand the resulting gas to it's final volume. For liquids that H-bond, the intermolecular forces represent the vast majority of the energy needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding question 1: The answer is you are "reading something into the question".

 

That individual constituents in a mixture do behave independently of the others is what validates the use of concepts like partial pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for answers! Everything makes so much more sense now.

 

Just curious, UC mentioned that ideal gas considers cases like low pressure and high temperature. I agree with the low pressure, but how does high temperature fit in this case as well? Or is it just a direct application of Charles's Law?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for answers! Everything makes so much more sense now.

 

Just curious, UC mentioned that ideal gas considers cases like low pressure and high temperature. I agree with the low pressure, but how does high temperature fit in this case as well? Or is it just a direct application of Charles's Law?

 

at a high temperature, the molecules have more kinetic energy, which makes any attractions between the molecules less significant when compared to that kinetic energy. Think of two people running past each other, and one tries to grab the other. The faster the people are running, the less effect the grab will have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.