Ironduke Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I've read alot of arguments for and against the theory of Neanderthal ancestry in modern Europeans and Near Eastern peoples, and I was wondering if anybody had good material on these arguments or arguments themselves on the theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I've kind of always thought this with the way the Picts were described, but I could equally see it being that they were simply erradicated by Homo sapiens sapiens... especially since many doubt the Neanderthals could even talk... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzurePhoenix Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Not anymore. Fossil evidence suggested that they were indeed capable of speech, but that they would simply have spoken slightly slower and at a nasally pitch. Whether or not they did speek is the question, for they could easily have had a rich, complex language without ever leaving behind signs of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Not anymore. Dawkins said otherwise in The Ancestor's Tale Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzurePhoenix Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I'm always interested in what Dawkin's might have to say. Does he think that they couldn't, or simply that they didn't? What was his theory, and what was it based on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john5746 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=14445&highlight=Neanderthal May find something in that thread. I wonder if we have more in common with Neanderthal or chimp? Edit: This is a reply to the first post of the thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 All hominids are going to be more closely related to each other than they are to chimps (i.e. they share a common ancestor with each other which chimps do not) Although obviously Lucy is more chimp-like than man-like... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I'm always interested in what Dawkin's might have to say. Does he think that they couldn't, or simply that they didn't? What was his theory, and what was it based on? He said the issue is still open to debate and that there is some very compelling evidence that they lacked the vocal development and brain structures required for (complex) speech, iirc. I can quote the relevant sections of the book later today if you'd like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john5746 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 All hominids are going to be more closely related to each other than they are to chimps (i.e. they share a common ancestor with each other which chimps do not) Although obviously Lucy is more chimp-like than man-like... Yes, your right that was a brain fart I had..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Dawkins had this to say on Neanderthal/Modern interbreeding: Are we descended from Neanderthals? If so, they would have to have interbred with Homo sapiens sapiens[/i']. But did they? They overlapped for a long time in Europe, and there was surely contact between them. But did it go beyond contact? Do modern Europeans inherit any Neanderthal genes? This is a hotly debated issue, recently reignited by a remarkable extraction of DNA from late Neanderthal bones. So far, we have extracted only the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA, but this is enough for a tentative verdict. Neanderthal mitochondria are quite distinct from those of all surviving humans, suggesting that Neanderthals are no closer to Europeans than to any other modern peoples. In other words, the female-line common ancestor of Neanderthals and all surviving humans long pre-dates Mitochondrial Eve: about 500,000 years as opposed to 140,000. This genetic evidence suggests that successful interbreeding between Neanderthals and Moderns was rare. On the issue of Neanderthal speech: Nobody knows whether they could speak, and opinions differ on this important question. Archaeology hints that technological ideas may have passed both ways between Neanderthals and Moderns, but this could have been by imitation rather than language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now