41 minutes ago, Samantha Priss said:

No it was completely on topic.

Disputing what the rules are or should be is not the same as expressing an opinion on how aggressively or liberally moderators enforce the rules.

You have a choice here. Continue to grind your own personal axe in the same environment where you have already been told plainly that a platform for those views will not be made available, or end up being sanctioned.

Hint: railing at the rules you agreed to abide by when you joined, and blaming everyone else for your inability to work within those parameters, is not the optimal strategy. 

6 minutes ago, Sayonara said:

Disputing what the rules are or should be is not the same as expressing an opinion on how aggressively or liberally moderators enforce the rules.

You have a choice here. Continue to grind your own personal axe in the same environment where you have already been told plainly that a platform for those views will not be made available, or end up being sanctioned.

Hint: railing at the rules you agreed to abide by when you joined, and blaming everyone else for your inability to work within those parameters, is not the optimal strategy. 

Your rules are fake. You claim to oppose "prejudice" and "bigotry". And then enforce racial-Marxism under those terms, which don't apply.

4 minutes ago, Samantha Priss said:

Your rules are fake. You claim to oppose "prejudice" and "bigotry". And then enforce racial-Marxism under those terms, which don't apply.

‘You rules are fake’ is a meaningless proposition.

You’ve been given your options, and your response shows what your choice is. I wish you the best of luck with that.