sheever

Sure. You can Google for the recent evidences on the laboratory created monopole for example also the room temperature superconductivity. There is much more but really wouldn't like to get into it. I am happy to discuss certain subject separately but in their relayed topics

Well. There are new experimental references the model based on . I see here the green boxes are the mostly in fashion.

Not to argue but that's only what is observable. There is a little more to it.

The problem is there is 3 emergent function observable as 2.as you can see one it doesn't allow you to correct mapping.

I Ll not discuss this any further until our model will be published.

Cheers

Where do you think the radiation coming from?

The reason I didn't make a comment because I didn't want to involve my work here as I would of then get warned for that .I couldn't be able to avoid this problem while I wanted to give you valuable detail to members . Although I understand the admins purpose of keeping topics tight in the same time you guys giving hard time to members for expressing opinions freely

Anti hydrogen fusion.

http://scitechdaily.com/cern-antimatter-experiment-produces-first-beam-antihydrogen/

http://ttf2009.ucsd.edu/research/surkogroup/positron/papers/sr6.pdf

time is the consequence of the breaking symmetry.it involves analog competition on macro level and quantise time to linear.

natural computation.

everything else is a deadend.

to explain better t is the summing of the fractions of Z.

X and Y axis doesnt exist without the Z fractions.X and Y is phase shifting relative to everything else trough the process of its own rotation growth

if you want arguing you will have to eliminate wave function of anything at the first place also spin.

You were asking about the great contractor regards to your theory here is this for you about the Plancks observation results of the dark flow.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5090

You wanted opposite cycle to neutron decay, so I gave it to you..

 

In the middle of link you should see (if you read it carefully):

 

D+ + T+ -> He-4 + 3.5 MeV + n0 + 14.1 MeV

 

That's how free neutron can be produced.

One of dozen possible options.

I see thanks for that ,yes i made a research on that.

Although alpha, beta, and gamma radiations were most commonly found, other types of decay were eventually discovered. Shortly after the discovery of the positron in cosmic ray products, it was realized that the same process that operates in classical beta decay can also produce positrons (positron emission)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay

Antimatter plasmas and antihydrogen

http://ttf2009.ucsd.edu/research/surkogroup/positron/papers/sr6.pdf

happy for you Swansont.

altough the thread starter post can be mistunderstood it has some point and sense to put under consideration.

You keep buggering me mate

I have right to reply and my post is relate to the thread

I did.whats your point?

we do not really know what would happen. there are a few competing models that to attemt to explain interaction here but there is no observation available to us yet that can confirm or deny one in particular. my suggestion is this. we observe matter getting close and then we observe large amounts of energy getting spit out. my guess is that for something strong enough to trap light involves huge amounts of force.

 

how big is your black hole?

i suggest nothing ever gets trough the firewall.its evaporating straight away.nothing ever gets inside the black hole.

the firewall is two layer,one is temporary and dependent the other one is permanent..

here is some lift for you Swansont.


Mononeutron: Isolated neutrons undergo beta decay with a mean lifetime of approximately 15 minutes (half-life of approximately 10 minutes), becoming protons (the nucleus of hydrogen), electrons and antineutrinos.

would you like me to to explain the opposite cycle as well?

thanks for clearing this out Mike,got you now.

Interaction drives computation on atomic level doesn't require simulation in my opinion.

Swanson not sure why you keep picking on me. Maybe you had hard childhood? I tried to support the poster but also I have my own opinion regardless if you like or not.

It's consequential. Nothing new about it. Mass is the manifestation of two tendencies against each other

hey Mike,

glad you found the lectures useful.this topic is very complex and causes lots of problems

the videos were

George F.R. Ellis on existence

George F.R Ellis on nature of causality in complex systems

and Chaos and Reductionism lectures

i can see the link are working on my computer.

Chaos is very precise in terms of fractals where the "noise" of the system is THE SYSTEM.

regards to causality once we take computing on account we always have top down causation constantly involved thats why is hard to eliminate consciousness problem

Time is summing value. I see less potential in the latest visual. Anyway good luck to your work. Cheers

Regards

Joseph

you may would like to watch these lectures Mike

simulations of 8000 body.

the other picture is chaos visual