maverick88

just a guess here' date=' but wouldn`t a "White hole" show up on our "radar" a little more evidently than a black hole does?

 

something as energetic in output as a "White hole" would be, surely would be far more easy to detect?[/quote']

 

I agree with YT and white hole are really somwthing completely theoretical that probably doesn't exist or at least human beings aren't able to detect it.

Using Assembly you can do with you computer almsot everything. If you know Assembly you can control every operation executed by your comp. You can do all sort of stranhe and funny things like binding the button "a" to write any word you want or any other function. You can burn you monitor up (the new monitors have all sorts of protections, though) or kick your hard disk's arse out of the room (exaggerating lol).

Had you ground the glass you would have seen the difference. If glass was green you wouldn't have seen through it like you can't see through the side like is presented it the picture. But as you know sometimes vert wide windows are produced and still we can see through

 

Yes' date=' you are. Any change in energy represents a change in mass, just (usually) an exceptionally tiny one..[/quote']

 

If so then why scientists hadn't payed attention to the disappearance of the mass at normal temperatures and when they neared significantly to the a.z. they did?

I am sorry but I have read it some time ago so I don't have it

I suppose you can easily find it by googling...

sry for that I just have no idea how I put my desktop here

:X

If you cool something by 3 degrees and it's not even near the a.z. then it doesn't lose mass I think (maybe I'm wrong),(It seems that when something is far away from the a.z. it is not affected by special properties that another material that is closed to the a.z. has, otherwise I think that the scientists would have noticed the loss of the mass in warming up from solid to gas (much more significantly) and not only while closed to the a.z.), does it?

Would an object have the same gravitational attraction at 0 degrees Kelvin as it does at 3 degrees Kelvin?

As far as I know, though it is impossible to reach absolute zero, theoretically the closer you approach the a.z. the less mass the material has.It was proved when scientists where very very very close to a.z. the saw that the hellium that was frozen started losing his mass.

So I don't understand WHAT can be affected by gravity at a.z.

negatively-charged electrode = cathode

positively charged electrode = anode

lol I think he asked about the velocitiy of rach car relatively to other

Gravitational force are not physical objects or particles. So the ultimate speed c does not apply here.

What about gravitons?

'']If you measure the speed of light in vacum, you always get the same value, no matter how you move.

But what is the reason for it?

You have 4 equation with more that 4 parameters

aren't they?

If we assume what's stated in the question to be correct then:

 

"the clock on the train slows down to half rate compared to clocks on earth" and "the clock on the rocket slows down to half rate compared to the clock on train" - ie: 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4 QUOTE]

 

Ohh yea you are right

I though rocket's speed is compared to Earth like train's velocity

never mind

The answer is that such a system will be impossible. The speed of the rocket with respect to the Earth will be zero if you do the relativistic time-dilation calculations, so it is impossible for the rocket to be moving in the opposite direction with respect to the train.

That's exactly what I said...

This system is possible when the rocket symply doesn't move..

Thr rocket and Earth will have the same time ----> she can't move(rocket)

but why impossible...the directions are opposite because train is moving in the opposite direction relatively to the rocket and Earth...

O_o

The answer is that such a system will be impossible. The speed of the rocket with respect to the Earth will be zero if you do the relativistic time-dilation calculations, so it is impossible for the rocket to be moving in the opposite direction with respect to the train.

That's exactly what I said...

This system is possible when the rocket symply doesn't move..

Thr rocket and Earth will have the same time ----> she can't move(rocket)

but why impossible...the directions are opposite because train is moving in the opposite direction relatively to the rocket and Earth...

O_o

Thr rocket and Earth will have the same time I suppose

Because rocket's and Earth's time relation to the train are same

Aren't they?

Thr rocket and Earth will have the same time I suppose

Because rocket's and Earth's time relation to the train are same

Aren't they?

Yes.

Using a calculator can find the value of sin (180-a)=sin A

But this definition is proved inside the geometry circle first.

Do you know the proof?

In order to understand the proof you have to uderstand the features of the function Sin: In every 180 degrees there are two equal values of sin (sin = the Y value of a tangle(any tabgle you choose)) besides 1 and -1. If so you can see that if a distance of two angles frim the Y-axis is equal-->their sin is equal

Yes.

Using a calculator can find the value of sin (180-a)=sin A

But this definition is proved inside the geometry circle first.

Do you know the proof?

In order to understand the proof you have to uderstand the features of the function Sin: In every 180 degrees there are two equal values of sin (sin = the Y value of a tangle(any tabgle you choose)) besides 1 and -1. If so you can see that if a distance of two angles frim the Y-axis is equal-->their sin is equal

The proof looks like' date=' sin (180-A)= sin A, how can I get the geometry proof of this ?

Anyone can help me ?[/quote']

 

ain(180-a) = sina because sinus is uneven function, to say sina=-sin(-a).

and because of sin beeng periodic (360 deg.) u can see that its values are same at 0 180 360 deg.

I hope i got what i mean

The proof looks like' date=' sin (180-A)= sin A, how can I get the geometry proof of this ?

Anyone can help me ?[/quote']

 

ain(180-a) = sina because sinus is uneven function, to say sina=-sin(-a).

and because of sin beeng periodic (360 deg.) u can see that its values are same at 0 180 360 deg.

I hope i got what i mean

Hello everyone!

 

Are there any GRE Chemistry examinees here in this site? Hope to receive responses here.

 

Regards' date='

Tashkent[/quote']

 

yea

here I am

Hello everyone!

 

Are there any GRE Chemistry examinees here in this site? Hope to receive responses here.

 

Regards' date='

Tashkent[/quote']

 

yea

here I am