# Notexceling

Members

15

## Profile Information

• Favorite Area of Science
Cosmology

0

1. ## The Omni Equation

Do I really need to explain it? Cantor showed infinity with fractions, decimal points or parts of 1. Again I ask how can the true absolute infinity be within mathematics that is restricted by 1 and governing laws?
2. ## The Omni Equation

Any infinity that can be calculated is subject to the number 1 in one way or another. Name me 1 infinity amongst the many sizes of Infinity (besides absolute infinity) that is not a Part of 1?
3. ## The Omni Equation

Infinity is within 1.
4. ## The Omni Equation

1 does not come in different sizes. The infinite possibilities with the use of or within the number 1 comes in different sizes.
5. ## The Omni Equation

I believe I have answered your question numerous times. I am not dismissing any of Cantors phenomenal work. The infinity your quoting is still within the confounds of the number 1. Again, 1 explains it has an Infinite amount of possibilities within itself (decimals, fractions etc) even though it has a bound and an end, a 100% complete value. It also explains the infinite possiblities by reproducing itself. It is illogical to think Absolute Infinity is within the restrictions of mathematics. Wouldn't it be beyond our numerical values (1), our universal laws(+|-), our time and space? I'm showing you an equation that is trying to justify beyond Cantor. The Absolute Infinity that can never have boundaries. 1+= ∞ outside of our (+|-) or (1) Cantors work has just been mislabeled as infinity, it is actually just the number 1. Literally think outside the box.
6. ## The Omni Equation

Please do so. My post topic however is the equation. It seems we have been side tracked from my religious background. Refer back to the original post Thank you

8. ## The Omni Equation

To claim a doctrine false, one would supply the evidence. If your claim the Quran is plagiarized due to the same accounts being mentioned in other doctrines, this is due to it being a final chapter, rather than a new religion. The Quran is a book about life, not someone's life. This is why it explains the universe rather than a human character that we think the universe of. Here's another example Expanding Universe 51.48 And the heaven We built with Our own powers (aydin) and indeed We go on expanding it (musi'un) The differences in the doctrines are extensive, even though the same characters and similar stories exist. Again however, my task was to introduce an equation, not to convert you. If you believe in Absolute infinity as being outside of our mathematical universal laws and inconceivable, then you follow the same doctrine that I follow. In regards to the other post Bounded infinites can A. Still be explained by 1, as it also can explain every TYPE of number. B. Still is within the confounds of mathematics C. The space inbetween the one 1 movement is also still within 1 and mathematics The topic is Absolute Infinity, not bounded
9. ## The Omni Equation

The reason is quite simple. We Muslims do not know what we have until Academia acknowledges a discovery. Very rarely do we have the ability of understanding our doctrine in a scientific manner before the scientist who has dedicated his life to the subject. Let me give you a quick example 36.80 The One who made for you from green trees, fire And Behold! With it it you kindle (your fire) Without Joseph Priestley's discovery of Oxygen in 1774 this passage from the Quran would have meant something totally different, especially for those with lack of educational facilities in the desert. Until it is proven, documented and eventually becomes common knowledge, our capacity lacks the means of deciphering its meaning. From a Muslim perspective, this wasn't always the case however. Up until the Siege of Baghdad, the Quran was allowed to be studied and reasoned with independently. In this Golden Age of Islam, Muslims were renowned for their knowledge and contributed works in numerous different fields of Academia. We understood the importance of the second most repeated word (after Allah) in the Quran "ilm" meaning knowledge/science. Unfortuntaley since then and all the way to current history, the middle east educational system is rated as one of the most lacking in quality, in the world. Institutionalized limitation were introduced in the 12th century and slowly, with the assistance of the ruling tribal Mongolians within that the era, intellectual freedom was irradicated. Hadiths (actions and sayings of the prophet) written more than 200 years after the prophets death have also contributed greatly to the poor educational system. The damage this book has caused is evident worldwide. I applaud anyone who can find me a terrorist/extremist Muslim who solely follows the Quran and not hadiths. Also due to the acceptance of this other book, questioning anything has become a punishable offense. They say, you follow. The Quran still however remains its ground as a mathematically sound book.

11. ## The Omni Equation

Zero being considered an additive identity is so humorous when zero can't even identify itself. Without 1 we have no identity or mathematics and vice versa. It is the absolute and complete identity of mathematics. 1 is the only unique number? 1 can explain 16 and 2/3 and even infinity, can any other number do that? Cantor found there could be many ∞, but all his explanations are restricted to existence of the number 1 and mathematics. Absolute Infinity must be greater than any/all restrictions. I'm just giving you an equation, that explains something Absolutely unrestricted. Beyond number 1 and mathematics. Absolute, in Totality infinity. How can there be several ∞ in any of Cantors work? 1 can explain them all yet we know 1 has a bound and an end.
12. ## The Omni Equation

I'm trying desperately to fix itIt keeps reverting back tithe same, when I leave paragraph spaces Sorry about the bullet points, it's the only fix

14. ## Question from an amateur in regards to rotation of sun

Hi all I understand the solar system orbits around the galactic center and the Moon orbits around the Earth, I also understand the central bodies are not "dragging" the orbiting bodies in any sense and they simply maintain the orbit through the gravitational force, according to our current knowledge. As th example I was given previously by astronomers of a merry-go-round in a playground: as you go around it there is a outward "centrifugal" force which is trying to throw you off; the only reason you don't go flying off is because you are holding onto it. Similarly, with the Earth and the Sun, the Sun's gravity holds the Earth in place as it orbits around and ensures that we don't go flying off into space. However, unlike the merry-go-round which has friction and slows down over time, the Earth meets almost no resistance in space and can orbit indefinitely without slowing down. This is all nice and dandy but it still leaves an unanswered question So my question is as follows; Is the Suns' rotation the reason we have years on earth? The example that I mentioned is a common astronomers example of how we orbit the sun. Yet, this does not explain why we orbit the sun. What gives the planets in our solar system the power to rotate around the sun? It merely can not be gravity. So the only possible answer I can seem to conjure up is the rotation of the sun is the reason planets orbit the sun. Is this correct? When we look at a galaxy, it seems that the core is spinning and bodies are rotating around it due to its motion. Then when you look at a minor scale the earths rotation seems to be causing the moon to orbit around us. From another perspective, if a planets or the suns rotation did cease, wouldn't that cause the orbiting bodies to break away?
15. ## Decimal points

Mind my stupidity If the number "1" explains itself and every other number, but, it's restricted to 100%, ( 1 = 100%) then Wouldn't that mean that the decimal value greater than 1 is part of another "(1)"? e.g 1.1 "(1)+(.1)" Even though it is developed with the original number, it has exceeded the boudaries of 100% I thought that " .1" must be part of another one that only has "(0.9)" remaining, only because of "(1)" being restricted to (100%). Another example 3.1415926535... (1)+(1)+(1) We have "3" individual 100% complete numbers, but I always thought that the next "1", or the 4th "1" is now only 0.9695184575... Am I wrong?
×