Semjase

Mine didn't. Search YouTube for Robert Lazar and also KGB aliens and you find the videos, they are very revealing and informative concerning government involvement in back engineering of UFO craft and actual footage of alien beings.

"here we are" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAheI1bRl5g "leaks to possibly come out" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYKJx3GnNzQ

Regardless, I have to go with the evidence and the evidence speaks for itself.

If a high ranking US military officer did a thorough investigation of the photographic evidence and said the that photos are authentic, who are you going to believe him with evidence or a disgruntled ex-wife.They have scientifically proven that the Golddigger Michelle Della Fave is not the extraterrestrial Asket as you can see in this video.

Meier's photo's were given the most advanced scrutiny of their day and pasted with flying colors. How can you discredit these 2 videos.

Here's credible evidence to backup these UFO photo's and and sound recordings. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfz56iX5Zhs

There's only one problem with your assessment these photo's have been around since the 1970's.

Explain these sighting as anything other than UFO's, I guess these are all fake as well? Here's some other interesting pictures from Plejaren craft.

An expert in the field of meteors say if the meteor would have exploded closer to the Earth there could of been a 100,000 causalities this would give benevolent aliens a reason to intercept it and cause it to explode at a higher altitude. This interview is very interesting and informative. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8bIHRxYA_E

When it comes to the blob on the last video it would be interesting to understand what the Russian guys are talking about, if they were talking about the blob or not? After all the images are analyzed barring any new evidence and was found that it was a UFO that intercepted the meteor, it will be dealt with like any other UFO story it will never be officially acknowledged or accepted in mainstream circles. Could this be the straw that breaks the camels back to finally getting official acknowledgement of the existence of extraterrestrial craft?

If the photographic images are authentic then it appears that the meteor was engaged by a UFO. Aliens having highly advanced technology seem to have time travel abilities, maybe they knew the outcome of the future if they didn't cause the meteor to explode at a higher altitude, it might have of led to more destructive consequences. Aliens always seem to want to attract attention to themselves maybe they knew of all these dashboard cameras in vehicles and could therefore stop destruction and bring attention to themselves at the same time. Here's video footage of a possible UFO near the path of the meteor fly over. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMirlPXSxhE

Maybe this UFO disclosure movie will shed a new light on the UFO question.

I've done the math and there's something drastically wrong with numbers on the meteors explosion energy. meteor mass = 9,000,000 kg meteor velocity = 17,000 m/s 1 megaton of TNT energy equivalency = 4.184*10^15 joules blast equivalency in megatons according to nuclear monitoring stations = 30 megatons Total energy of blast = 30*4.184*10^15 J= 1.255*10^17 joules Total energy of the meteor = .5*9,000,000 kg * (17,000 m/s)^2 = 1.3005 * 10^15 joules The energy numbers are out by a factor of about 100 The blast energy is 100 times the meteor's energy This is evidence that there had to be an outside energy source which supports the UFO theory. I was looking at the Tunguska blast energy equivalency numbers by mistake the energy numbers do match provided the estimated mass of the meteor is correct. These 2 web pages support these numbers http://ca.news.yahoo.com/russia-meteor-blast-largest-detected-nuclear-monitoring-system-224151086.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Sulawesi_superbolide

It will interesting to see how far this story goes. http://latitude.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/a-meteor-falls-and-the-russian-character-comes-out/

The problem with that is the first camera was stationary, it doesn't seem plausible considering the footage, both cameras producing the same moving reflection?

Here's video footage of the other camera showing the same unidentified object approaching the meteor from the same angle "shooting down" I'm quoting a term used by another report. In reality it appears from the 2 videos an unidentified object intercepted the meteor and caused it to explode. Unless the video's are faked what other conclusion could you draw?

2 different cameras filming the meteor just before it explodes show the same unidentified object approaching the meteor from the same angle. The other camera view can be seen on this thread on post # 32, then you decide.If you get enough original data from a number of cameras showing the same unidentified object approaching from the same angle then chance of fraud disappears to nothing. Then you have an unexplained mystery.

There's photographic evidence to support this hypothesis the rest is anybody's guess, without more evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_OxMaJPiC8

Is there something to the possibility that the meteor could have been shot down, they have to look at all the evidence and get to the bottom of it, there's lots of photographic evidence and eye witnesses so the task can't be that difficult. http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/2013/02/which-russian-meteor-conspiracy-theory-sounds-best-to-you-

This video is as credible as it gets.

Watch revelations of the pyramids, maybe it will change your mind on this subject. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tW0ApDr032I

There are many ancient writing and drawings that depict alien beings and craft that ancient people revered as Gods. The Semjase contacts give a history of some of the Alien activity through out history http://www.semjase.net/semjeng6.html There's credible information on Wikipedia on ancient astronauts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_astronauts Some other related information on ancient aliens http://listverse.com/2011/02/21/top-10-mysteries-surrounding-ancient-aliens/

I've found support that the acceleration of the universe might just be an illusion from this researcher http://www.nbcnews.com/id/44690771/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/accelerating-universe-could-be-just-illusion/#.USP9qPJzeM0 Maybe someone could decipher from this article or other information about research that led to the discovery of what appears to be an accelerating universe and say if my theory is feasible. http://www-supernova.lbl.gov/PhysicsTodayArticle.pdf

Dark matter's resultant dark energy is theory considered for the increased velocity of expansion of the universe, I'm proposing a more rational idea for the increasing velocity of the universe. The theory is a follows - The universe today can be modeled as series of shells one within each other, a shell can be looked at a charged hollow sphere where the electric field inside the sphere is zero the same can be said for a universe shell where the gravitational force acting on a body inside the shell will be minimal from the shell. The density of mass on the outer shell of the universe is less than an inner shell,which is the case in any explosive event. The only thing that slows the expansion of the universe is the shell acting on it's shelf,therefor the inner shell slows it's expansion velocity faster than the outer shell, due to the closer distances between mass in the inner shell opposed to the outer shell. This effect gives the illusion of the universe expanding at an increasing rate of velocity, in reality then inner part of the universe's expansion velocity is slowing at a greater rate than the outer part of the universe's expansion velocity. If we could look back past the location of the big bang we could determine if this theory is right or not at that point the universe's expansion would appear to be slowing, if the universe was in a continual increase of the expansion velocity this would not be the case. To simplify this it boils down to the fact that the force of gravity slowing the expansion velocity increases as you move towards the inside fringes of the inner part of the universe.

This must be the crater from the meteor what else could it be? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pRBt1jhc78