Sciencegod

HI Friend, You basically didn't answer my question? what you have expressed is a standard answer which is known to every body including me? what i am specifically interested to ask you is that, when the pendulum is released from the point A, it accelerates and thereby the velocity increases and is maximum at point C, well taken, but what happens there after is of particular interest to me and for all, From the point C the pendulum is still in motion and we know that motion is associated with kinetic energy, therefore, some energy is consumed to take the pendulum from the point C to point B, so my basic question is, why then it is not added to the Kinetic energy term? To give you another example, lets take a tennis ball in our hand, throw it straight up into the air, What do you think really happens? The ball which was at rest in your hand slowly accelerates and then reaches the maximum velocity and thereafter it decelerates and reaches the point of rest, please note, all this while the ball is still in motion and therefore the energy associated should be Kinetic in nature. the point at which it attains rest is the point of PE? Therefore, didn't we account a two way process in this action? if we did, then the KE term will become (mv2) and PE term would become (2mgh)? The basic argument is about the energy associated with the pendulum at the point 'A' and in this context i have already given the example of a running man in my document? Energy is consumed for accelerating as well as decelerating? it's a two way process? Don't you think so? Therefore, one has to account for this? if we account this energy, then the energy relation doubles as described in my document? This is what is wrong in our science, very very elementary, and as a result has huge consequences for science? I hope you can imagine it too! Thanks!

Thanks for taking the time to correct me on that, I would be very happy to know your views on the attachment which i have produced in support of my argument, If you could please kindly read and express your sincere thoughts on that, it would definitely be of great help. I would be very happy, if you could point out where i have gone wrong in my analysis for the same!

I am here with attaching the argument of my case, that the present day kinetic energy relation is incorrect. If i am wrong in my analysis, let some one please correct me. I am very happy to be corrected. We know, Energy = Force * distance; E = F * d E = ma * d (Substituting for force) E = m{(v-u)/t) * d (Substituting for 'a') E = m{v/t} * d ( assuming that u = 0) E = mv {d/t} (re- arranging) --> simple commutative property E = mv {v} E = mv2 (Kinetic energy relation is disproved) NOTE: The above derivation seems to be alright from a mathematician's point of view but mainstream researchers call it pseudo derivation? Why? I cannot make any sense of it all. Please kindly share your sincere views on the same. Also, please kindly look at the attachment provided in favour of it. KE.doc

Perpetual Motion Machine is a real possibility. Please wait for few more months and this world will witness the greatest triumph of human inquiry. The mainstream researchers will be stumped and silenced for once?

That which is incomprehensible for ordinary mortals!

Hello Everybody, I would start by asking a simpe question, Is our Physics wrong? if So, then the whole of science is wrong too? Does any one of you think the same, then please share your views? I seriously believe that we have missed something very crucial in our understanding of nature, and its in particular related to our study of energy which is incomplete according to me. Our current science is built on the foundations of classical physics. Is it going to crumble any time soon? There are many inconsistencies and anomalies in current physics. I have discovered it myself. Has any one of you discovered the same, if so, kindly advise. To give you a simple idea, Is Kinetic Energy relation = 1/2 mv square or (mv square). What do you think is the right answer? The obvious answer is very well known, but still few people have got doubts regarding it including myself. Kindly express your sincere views on the subject, Thanks,