Rossonero

Originally posted by PogoC7

The reactions I expected from haters.

No counterpoint.

A real picture. Would not waste the time to photoshopping that.

Look at all that space and those BIG cars too. No minis here.

 

Link removed

no offense or n e thing but u really are a loser, sorry to sayonara .

wow a flag

funny that one of my posts were deleted

Not from this thread they weren't, so quit whining. - Say.

sorry... tried to delete this post but it seems the permissions rnt set to allow me to... :spam:

Originally posted by Sayonara³

If you're going to go so far as to call people racist, you would do well to explain why you think that is so.

 

Otherwise there's nothing stopping me from calling you an Aussie Convict, and this thread would just deteriorate into name calling.

thats all well and good, considering: -

1. How many Italian Convicts do u know that came too australia.

2. My parents came to australia in the 70's

3. We still have a house and residence in Italy.

4. I have both italian and australian citizenship.

5. well, im sure if i wanted to i could think of a 5, but atm cbf.

Originally posted by Aardvark

Racists? Look in the mirror.

 

You're the ones who seem to think its fine to leave the Iraqis in the grips of a brutal dictactorship. I wonder if you would feel the same way if they were white rather than arab?

hmmm, exept for the fact that i am caucasian, so, would that make me racist against myself.

wake up and smell the coffee. racists . :lame:

Originally posted by Sayonara³

And was anything achieved?

no because, comprimising isnt a two way street for the bush administration and they turned well away from the issues of our importance and wish us to jump on the banwagon in support of their hidden agenda.

Originally posted by Matzi

Not if they do not agree in an issue.

i agree

all i am saying is that the US should stop putting pressure on other countries. they can ask us once or twice to participate, but they should get the message and stop critisising, b!tching and pushing other countries into a war which they do not want to fight.

Also, who are the US government to all of a sudden just butt into australian politics and try to make decisions on our behalf. That goes majorly to the american ambassador to australia, who should go bak to america.

originally posted by AardvarkSimply turnng away from someone you diagree with achieves nothing.

funny that. when Prime Minister Howard went to america to remotely discuss free trade to benefit both american and australian farmers, Bust turned right away from the discussion.

So in my books the Bush Administration can go F@%k themselves up a tree. and perhaps if Bush so badly wants to kill sadam, maybe he should ask him for a 1 on 1 battle. rather than killing heaps of innocent civilians.

all i am saying is that there are more than one cookie to crunch in this issue. america seems to be trying to form world dictatorship more and more every day. hmmm, lets say US Secretary of State = abuses forein members of the security council because they do not want to support them in a war.

If AMERICA wants to go to war with Iraq. then fine, they can. But stop dragging other countries in there own personal issues with them.

so GWB should jump on his OWN banwagon and go at it alone, and leave other countries out of it. And the WWI/WWII excuse is just pathetic.

Hmmmm, lets see. WWI, the USA assisted for personal gain, SUPER HIGH INTEREST RATES ON LOANS TO THE ALLIES.

Geeeze, just like the US...... After world war 1, it was US President Wilsons idea to start the league of nations... New President ellected and they didnt join. There is just to much chopping, changing and backflipping in american congress. And NOW the US government is trying to butt into australian politics and lashing out at our opposition party's to the govt. well they can just leave australia alone, and worry bout there own bloody issues and take their stupid american ambassador to australia with them... we dont want him or need him here.

in-ter-net.... try emailing a university. however be sure to email the correct science department. im sure that they would be more than happy to help if u say u want to make the world a better place.... blah blah blah and u want to make people aware of pollution damage to frogs through a science experiment at school. sound like a hippy. that may be a problem tho, coz hipee's are dumb.

u's are all so bias.:bs:

Originally posted by Piccolo

He enden his term with the biggest surplus that bush later took to shit by giving it to the rich just spreading it out to the big companies.

 

And may I say the economy went to shit as well.

ya and now the US is in debbbbbbbbbt :cool: :cool:

Originally posted by Piccolo

Yes but then was then. Back in the good all days when war was war I mean when it was over it was over. terrorism is not the same. I think I have already explained myself. and terrorism mixed with religion doesent help anymore.

back in the napoleanic times.

I think we are all failing to grasp the meaning of this zazoo.

1. Israel + Palestinians isnt a holy war, it is a territorial dispute.

i havnt got much time atm, but i will post 2 to 10 a bit later.

Originally posted by aman

If the US steps back and lets the UN handle anything I've listed, then nothing will be handled. The UN has no power.

Just aman

Hmmm, that is not true. The UN has support of The combining nations which gives it it's authority. When the UN makes decisions, it makes them in agreeance with each member nations ambassadors. It is thus, the US that holds no real external jurisdiction over other nations, appart from its seat in the UN.

Originally posted by aman

Iraq is not the only problem. It is the priority because of its potential danger. Remember 1 tbsp of Anthrax closing buildings up to congressional offices for over a year and then then think of saddam with hundreds of liters as just one example.

We still have to keep India and Pakistan from nuking each other, North Korea contained, try for peace in Israel and Palestine, and then we are just getting started finally with the continent of Africa. It sucks but we are our brothers keeper.

We can't do anything from a postition of weakness, cus that's just the way the world is.

Just aman

It is the job of the UN sto oversee such things not the US. The US administration at the present, like the administration after President Wilson in would war two, is far to incompetent and unreliable to do such things.

Originally posted by fafalone

I haven't met anyone who opposes the war who fully understands the deception and failure to cooperate Iraq continues to display.

try me btw i am due to start my major at university on the cold war. so try me more after that.

Hi, im new here.

Im just wondering if there are any invision users here that know about using hacks and stuff to update forums.

Cheers,

Rossonero

It is the topic of the town all over the world. Do we support the US? Should the US go to war (invade) Iraq? Is America Power Hungry? Is GB a gready oil merchant?

These might be some of the questions which may be surrounding you at this present time, regarding a potential war with Iraq.

Personally I think that there should not be a war. There is an inprobable solution that I wouldn't mind seeing happen.

Countries in dispute = Iraq and United States of America

Solution = They BOTH (Not Just Iraq) Forfeit any of the weapons of mass destuction and have them destroyed. Also, the USA should allow weapons inspectors from Iraq to inspect the USA for weapons and Iraq should do the same.

I know that is inprobable, but wouldn't it be a good solution.

:feedback: