superball

the pole shifting. the magnetic field represented as a man holding the spherical field magnet. 3 object being pulled, the men holding hands. dictating spin direction clockwise around our solar system. solar system is rotating counter clock wise around the sun. poynting vector glyph . The asymmetric field magnet The poynting vector vector, sincerely super ball Meet the modern day dipole, it was my discovery, derived from my inner perception, and philosophy. Peace always.. Respectfully super-ball

I am surprised there has been no additional data input. I will include data for review. I had asked the questions : In relation to casimirr, Wiki said "effect When this field is instead studied using quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force, either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates." Super ball says: This is my confusion, virtual photon constitutes the field. I bring your attention to this interpretation of what constitutes the field, or virtual vacuum, or photon field what have you. My interpretation below, as stated from wiki " virtual photons (which constitute the field,) and (generate a net force,) either an (attraction or a repulsion) depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates." I know The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, without any external electromagnetic field. With that said, how do we acquire the charge on the spheres, and cause the virtual photon field to generate a net force? By acquiring the same replant charges in the first place, and accelerating them together. I do realize this effect is verifying, it has occurred, and continues to do so. The first task is by arranging two like charges of a material that would not have any attracting force in the ISCM, or outer-space. You might say, How can that be all body's attract, but is that an assumption? It certainly is. Name two bodies that would have the same type charges as described. I will give you a clue. After you say your prayers tonight of course. your concern may lead to a better understanding of the process of torque induced precession. It has been found to be a progression of axial shift. Over a 3 to 5 year period starting in early months of 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLy0IQT8ssk Wiki " Poynting vector From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dipole Radiation, Dipole parallel to the z-axis, electric field and poynting-vector in the x-z-plane. In physics, the Poynting vector can be thought of as representing the directional energy flux density (the rate of energy transfer per unit area, in W/m2) of an electromagnetic field. It is named after its inventor John Henry Poynting. Oliver Heaviside and Nikolay Umov independently co-invented the Poynting vector. In Poynting's original paper and in many textbooks it is defined as which is often called the Abraham form; here E is the electric field and H the auxiliary magnetic field.[1][2] (All bold letters represent vectors.) Sometimes, an alternative definition in terms of electric field E and the magnetic field B is used, which is explained below. It is even possible to combine the displacement field D with the magnetic field B to get the Minkowski form of the Poynting vector, or use D and H to construct another.[3] The choice has been controversial: Pfeifer et al.[4] summarize the century-long dispute between proponents of the Abraham and Minkowski forms." You might say, all may be verified mathematically, and the need for clarification is irrelevant. The two repulsive forces are derived by said objects being made of the same generating material. El e ho. respectfully super-ball..

Reinforcing you claim in lay-men philosophy view This is disheartening. You say science no longer calls for some metaphorical reinforcement from an underlying truth. Tell that to the guy trying to reproduce in a laboratory experimental evidence. How in the world of pots, and pans does is given explanation sufficient? without grasping the concept? How might I understand by observation this is so? It has been said mathematics may be reduced to a simple understanding. Binary code, binary words. How could you grasp meaning living in the realm of scrutiny without knowledge of what is actually occurring? QM is a highly evolved mathematical discipline. QM is needed for the task. The statement (I do not think) is exactly what I am trying to determine.. In reality, and not fantasy we must think. In order for the next man to grasp a given concept. It must be relative to the observer. You may say QM gives solutions to a given problem. I tend to agree, but QM is giving answers, not short cuts? For vastly difficult problems, and models that require QM for the solution. It is not philosophy, nor is it a theory. It is the data set required, as it stands. QM is needed... I 100% agree with this statement in relation to QM finding specific particles, and relating these particles to the world of pots, and pans is irrelevant. (unobtainable) I hope my statements are not is some way unrelated, or in poor taste. Respectably super-ball.

I understand this does not relate to your questioning, But it will serve for my purpose intended. Have you considered this explanation? Energy is increasing in a closed system. You have taken a balloon, you have set it at rest, and then watch the heat dissipate from the closed system analogy. Have you considered placing the balloon inside a hotter system after you have blown up the balloon? Now you see there is measurable effects on the system as a whole. The energy continues to increase until the balloon explodes. I am speaking of a closed system that has external energy in the form of induction entering the system. You may interject. I say there is outgoing heat, and incoming heat in relation. Outgoing energy is also increasing. Therefore both internal energy, and external energy is changing in relation. The closed system has a greater ability to retain the energy for a much longer time period. So if we continue in this manner, or line of cause, and effect the balloon will eventually pop. Bruce lee stated " it strikes all by itself" I concede to his line of reasoning, gravity bends all by itself. see picture. sincerely super-ball.

Ok, I am happy you looked for average quakes in a given time period. less then one month. Based on the analogy of the data provided, if you want to get technical, and yes science does, you must provide data within the parameters, or scope determined to be highly unlikely to occur. Go back to the top of the page. 6.0 or better is a given. The greater the magnitude of prediction, the less likely it is to occur. I also stated you must go back to a somewhat stable platform 2009. When dealing with averages, the greater the imputable input factors, the greater the average relation over time. I did not say a 6.0 earthquake would happen, I have set the bar much higher. you must go back to the year 2008-2009 and make your average entirely. You must also do the same for the entire year of 2010 to the current date. Compare, see if a time sensitive progression has occurred as of Feb 27, 2010. Then you must determine how an earthquake is related as a time sensitive factor, comparing the 4 years of total data. To be on the safe side, 2 years before progression, 2 years of progression. Now you plot on two charts, each with 2 years of average data, and compare. The chart will tell the story all by itself. the chart must follow the time sensitive information provided. Meaning each month, and each quake plotted on the chart 6.0 or greater corresponds, or in relation with the date it had occurred. By doing so, the data will reflect to a much higher degree of accuracy. Sincerely super-ball.

Yea, I was thinking the same thing. When I looked back, I was surprised to find the information spinning off, and the change to the speculation board. Pun intended. Respectfully super-ball. I relay like your take on this, I added it here, I hope you don't mind. super-ball Axioms Quark 1) What is holding us against the Earth? 2) Why is it able to do so? 3) What interaction is there between matter and space? 4) How is it relevant to what is keeping us from being flung from the Earth? 5) What exactly is gravity? 6) Why is G found is both Einstein and Newtons equations? (curvature of space-time) = (mass-energy density) * 8 pi G / c4 Fg=Gm1m2/d^2 These are just a few questions to get the discussion going. I think this topic will clarify a lot of what was said in a different topic called "do objects fall at the same speed? no" or something close to that. The arguments mainly revolved around gravity so here is a chance to explain your understanding of what it actually is. Gravity Please Delete this thread in its entirety is the best we can do, cheers.. Please Delete this thread in its entirety is the best we can do, cheers..

It has been determined that Earthquakes are not time sensitive by modern science, therefore it is irrelevant to base your assumptions on averages. Especially when dealing with a time sensitive progression. The progression of axial shift has already been determined, It is a progression of a given effect not related to plate tectonics. Respectfully super-ball. You may assert your objections in the year 2020, whereby plate tectonics alone play a major roll. Sincerely super-ball.

In some cases yes, observation describes what you see, the ability of determining out come, and what you are actually seeing is a fundamental property philosophy. intuitive, but questions that answers, are not intuitive per se. How was it derived is philosophy. respectfully super-ball

Wingo, I can only state by my experiences, and the out comes may not be the same. It takes time to reflect in the mirror, your individual presumption, even asking. : what is it?" A determination of what they actually are. Words echo in my mind. seemingly we have connections. we draw on experience, and when our experiences fail we adapt, even though we make the same mistakes. Who was the red queen? Thor from your post your link, I especially liked your take on cause and effect, were certain particular influences are striking the same cords. The human experience. All of us who have preceded experience, and also determine many of the same conclusions we do today. We have not been accepted, and must demonstrate genuine substance, the very material of our being. Leading to determinations, and meaning of the words" I am." We are unique individuals, together we are greater. The numbers accounting for the whole. All of that has not reseeded, even what preceded will come again. We are after all exactly the same. You can even plot that on a chart. If I had to continue. what is fanning? fanning the flames for more energy, what is E-Motion? it Is energy in motion. what is the magic mirror? The window of your inner soul. Because we are neither hot, nor cold, because some choose to be Luke warm, evolution is hinder, the rotation, and resolutions. The standards we place on ourselves. Many snippets, ringing the same bell. I was cold, I had to fan the flames, so I would not be chilli. The tones changing, mildly in some instances resonating, even quaking, this mural is in fact moral, It makes up our very being . Philosophy is inherent to human nature, the process based on the learning traits, and experiences we all have. Always wondering what is our purpose, never drawing a conclusion is tardy in school. The connection of our mind, our body, and experience lead us to considerations self evident analogy, and if we are careful to perform without ego gain virtue. If you search for answers they are provided. provided from the vast melting of consciousness of the eternal realm. purely instinctive, but capable of understanding. If this had not been the case, then as a whole social skills, and the development of moral fiber would be impossible, and we would be dis-functional. like the vulture, or locusts of corporate greed . The underworld in the literal scene, are the snakes in the proverbial grasses. The fly on the wall. striving to evolve they remain as a whole unable to do so, and are destroyed by the very thing that was inherent to there nature. As such unable to comprehend, confounded, and by nature cannot be an integral part of the whole. The sleepy dorm mouse opens doors, and the thieve is locked up never to open one again.. we are in a sense trapped inside our bodies, even the mind much like the thief. the difference is we understand the process of evolving. We understand the importance of virtue. The thief, he will always be the same. Without connection we cannot test the soul. without similarity, we would never discover the truth, and meaning of life. the acid test is this life. when i was younger my sister had told me i had to learn to read between the lines. Only after years of discipline was i even able to comprehend what she was actually saying. the parables of meaning. the ability of reaching outwards, stepping onto the plateau of our very limits. hoping in the end to reach a even higher flight. I thank you for sharing, adding to the pool that is our understanding. Nothing hidden will remain hidden indefinitely, o ha so true. Peace always, super-ball

Thor, I enjoyed the reading from the link you have provided. I sent my write up to the mystery, I thank you for sharing. Sincerely, super-ball

first result.. MAP 6.6 2011/11/22 18:48:17 -15.359 -65.125 556.7 BENI, BOLIVIA

The Mysteries: Greetings All. Whats going on? I thought this would be a good topic, many of us share the same Interests, and study. I love the big bang theory. Very well produced, and funny. I may not believe in the big bang itself. I love space, here I am, what am I doing here another mystery. I study Philosophy, I draw conclusions. I use the scientific method. I wonder if, I wonder Why, did I think this, did I think that? A band of brothers, are we connected? Does our thoughts spread out and propagate in all directions? Did you get the call? School of rock, school of hard knocks, school of fish. Form a union, form a sculpture, form my mind. A picture tells a thousand words. Symbols the study of. Binary code, binary words, I speak in a parable, the meaning of life. What are The waters, what is the light? I thank God for life. Open your eyes, open the door, open your mind, open your heart, Window to the soul. What is the meaning of I am? I like poetry, but was it I who moved the pen? These are the mysteries, please add yours. I hope this will take off. Stop bye, say Hi, Will tomorrow ever die. cheers, Super-ball.

Try this on for size, quantum mechanics is defined as being derived, and is a form of metaphysics. That much is clear. Cheers, super-Ball My link

[quote Does your model account for change in insolation at 65o N. Latitude? The current model includes this as a trigger for changing glacial regimes. How does your model differ (in that aspect of changing insolation) from the current model? You are asking me for a trigger that will give a signal correct? It has been provided. A tilt, or shift in earth axial. You say, he say, a trigger is needed. Is the specific latitude needed to understand what a trigger is? No. You say, the current model includes this as a trigger for changing glacial regimes, and is determined by the amount of solar energy hitting a given point. average in watts per square meter (W/m2) This is an assumption on there side. Would you like to state the figures if you can locate them please? Global warmers, the conditions, and requirements are based on the assumption of solar energy, some specific measure has been included although it has never been observed. Ice age, this model also included solar energy as a main contributor. No specific location, or intensity of solar energy needed. Although it is clearly Higher in recent years. Does global warmer give an approximation? Time frame for this specific trigger, when will this happen? When will the heat all by itself reaching a given point on the globe trigger this ice age? Observation is a key factor. sincerely super-ball

Greetings all, Research, and development stages. The idea of using solar power has been determined to be a viable resource. There is a lack of information of engineering based concepts on the subject. What I am suggesting is, engineering, and development. Is there any information you can provide, listing the best solar reflector designs ? I have not seen enough research leading to development, or concepts that increase the output of reflectors.. Is there any one working in the field who has engineered a solar reflector? "The smaller the mirrors the greater the reflective power." Sincerely, super-ball.

There may be a polarizing effect related, the xenon type bulb uses more power, more luminosity.

cherry pie, that certainly is the best answer. cheers. cherry pie, that certainly is a great answer. cheers.

The story of religion is similar all over the world. Remember they were dealing specifically with a new star, and researchers may have studied it for some time before trying to get a better view. We have Easter Island, and some very large monoliths facing a specific direction, possibly a place on earth were it was viewable. How can a star be followed? If the stars Is poynting in relation to the observer. I would follow the yellow brick road to find a solution. "Pointed" Much love super-ball

Self-evident or to define and delimit the realm of analysis. In other words, an axiom is a logical statement that is assumed to be true. Therefore, its truth is taken for granted, and serves as a starting point for deducing and inferring other (theory dependent) truths. basic, foundational proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition, or assumption. Q: When we describe a system effected by change, how do you determine, and go about explaining these changes in a scientific manner? Include, and determine the state of changes occurring in the system leading to a functional physical working model. My question was used to determine these factors. The methodology, I had used the axiom assuming all is true. A list of some questions, Does global warming models list these factors in a cause, and effect chain? From an observable point of view are current models functional? Do they explain to a high degree all of the main causes in order of importance? What is assumed to be self evident? A trend can be used to determine a cause. True, or false? Every thing in nature, everything included in a system has a generating effect on another system. A Cause and effect chain answers, or explain questions related to specific change. Keep in mind the model is not related to a global warming process. (Instead it is used to determine the outcome of cause and effects related). The foundation of change in a system is categorized in a cause and effect chain. Observable, testable, factual. Open for amendments. This is my intention, to answer any questions related to The predictions, effects, or results of less well known factors related to the present day. By doing so, the information I will provide will answer many questions related to past, present, and future. I thank you for your time. Respectfully super-ball.

No. short description is in the final, labeled final. I feel it was unfair for you to ask. It was my question. It was intended for the reader to answer. Grammar is poor in some instances. I made many mistakes. I am sorry. The way I had answered my own question was as (example). If you did not understand the question, or understand how to relate, I am sorry. The final author notes section is labeled. Now you have asked for opinion, and should come at a later time. I will not pollute the main factors provided with opinions, before we agree on something. I have many questions in this model. I have answered all questions related. Progress answers questions. There is plenty of questions to be answered on your part also. The model is not opinion based sorry. Please answer questions related to content in previous posts. I think more clarity will be obtained on both our parts. I sincerely Intend for clarity. If you may help me please by doing so. I clearly stated this is not global warming model. I clearly describes how the model was intended to be used. sincerely I do appreciate your time, maybe we can find a better use for it. I am going in circles here. OP is ice age yes, but will provide many less known relations. cause and effect means it gives cause for a given effect, so The model will clearly answer many more questions unrelated to atmosphere alone. Currently Used by Present day Global warming models, So yea cause and effect answer many questions related to observation. The model is very different Yes. I like your explanation, and I will provide, if you have a specific question related to current models please ask, this will systematically answer all line of questioning. My question for you is, would you like to ask a question about any current (global warming model) If yes I will attempt to use the model for that purpose. This is my intention, and I thank you for mentioning it. The only problem with that is I am the expert relating to my content. I do not believe current models are expressed in a few short paragraphs expressing cause, and effect for any given subject related to the system we call Earth. Thank you guys for asking for clarity, I hope I have done so. respectfully super-ball.

Greetings again, I remember reading about the detectors when the 2 scientist mention had used different methods to detect neutrino. I did read what was available at the time, and it was fascinating. I also did little investigation at the time, because It was a new study. Today I located some of the research, and would like to share. I cannot draw any conclusions due to a lack of research on my part. I include a link for further study on the subject, and I take note of this particular excerpt from the paper. It may have been suggested, assuming only one possible solution. Time will tell. I also take note of the amount of heat involved during the solar process. The seemingly oscillating, and morphing neutrino was found to have a very small mass. The category of electron type flavors of neutrino is also noted. In conclusion I am following classical electrical mechanics. Oscillatory movements suggest something is changing in relation to the medium. What ever it may be, it must be in relation to change. You put me on the ropes, and this is the best I can do. cheers. "The standard model of particle physics assumes that neutrinos are massless. In order for neutrino oscillations to occur, some neutrinos must have masses. Therefore, the standard model of particle physics must be revised. The simplest model that fits all the neutrino data implies that the mass of the electron neutrino is about 100 million times smaller than the mass of the electron. But, the available data are not yet sufficiently definitive to rule out all but one possible solution. When we finally have a unique solution, the values of the different neutrino masses may be clues that lead to understanding physics beyond the standard model of particle physics. two equivalent descriptions of neutrinos, one that is expressed in terms of the masses of the neutrinos and one that is expressed in terms of the particles with which the neutrinos are associated (electron neutrinos with electrons, muon neutrinos with muon particles, or tau neutrinos with tau particles). The relations between the mass description and the associated-particle description involve certain constants, called "mixing angles," whose values are potentially important clues that may help lead to an improved theory of how elementary particles behave. Solar neutrino research shows that neutrinos can change their personalities or types. The mathematical description of this malady determines quantities that we hope will be useful clues in the search for a more general theory of how fundamental particles behave. What Does All This Mean for Astronomy? The total number of neutrinos observed in the SNO and Super-Kamiokande experiments agrees with the number calculated using the standard computer model of the Sun. This shows that we understand how the Sun shines, the original question that initiated the field of solar neutrino research. The solution of the mystery of the missing neutrinos is an important triumph for astronomy. The standard solar model predictions are vindicated; the standard model of particle physics must be revised. Four decades ago, when the first solar neutrino experiment was proposed, no one would have guessed that this turn of events would be the outcome. In order to predict correctly the number of neutrinos produced by nuclear reactions in the Sun, many complicated phenomena must be understood in detail. For example, one must understand a smorgasbord of nuclear reactions at energies where measurements are difficult. One must understand the transport of energy at very high temperatures and densities. One must understand the state of the solar matter in conditions that cannot be studied directly on Earth. The temperature at the center of the Sun is about 50,000 times higher than the temperature on Earth on a sunny day and the density in the center of the Sun is about a hundred times the density of water. One must measure the abundances of the heavy elements on the surface of the Sun and then understand how these abundances change as one goes deeper into the Sun. All of these and many more details must be understood and calculated accurately." My link Respectfully super-ball.

some The assumption would be less, and less likely to occur if there was found to be more galaxy's in the universe than neutron stars. On the other hand if a galaxy was formed from a neutron star, the lack of observable neutron stars compared to the amount of observable galaxy, would suggest the universe is even older then previously measured. The statement, some neutron stars may produce a galaxy is still valid IMHO. NAS movie Cheers, super-ball.

Can my statements be considered as both, conjecture, and philosophy? In each case what statement makes the best argument? 1. In a perfect solar system, were the sun is at the center, all planets would exhibit more symmetric orbits. Assuming the system was stationary, and not revolving around the arms of a galaxy. Relative to a fixed point at the center of rotation of that system. 2. The reason for elliptical orbits is due to the age of the system, whereby symmetric orbits have dgenerated due to friction, heat, and movement around the outer bands of the system. 3. In a perfect solar system, the reason for elliptical orbits is due to the age of the system, whereby symmetric orbits have degenerated due to friction, and heat alone. Thank you. Sincerely super-ball