exploration

I have to say good night to everyone online now.

Hello once again ! Up to now,human know little about what exactly he want. Alsi from whatever he wants he also lack the capability to extract errors therein. Based on this evidence HOW CAN SCIENTIST BE. QUALIFIED FOR. EDITING THE SETTINGS OF. NATURE after he is absolutely ignorant about THE VISION AND SOLE AIM OF EXISTENCE

This will be of no use for you. ANY RESTRICTION WILL CAUSE YOU A LOT,and I can affect your database SOURCE CODE and TARGETING the various linking CLASSES thus uprooting the manners of the MAIN CODES.

mr mississipichem how comes to your imagination if I use DIFFERENT NAMES THE SAID SO CONCRETE SCIENTIFIC THEORIES WILL SOON RENDERED INVALID AND THE SCIENTIFIC FALSE MASK SHALL BE UNVEILED .......

This is of no benefit for you THE SCIENCE FORUM trying to deceive innocent people. BLOCKING KNOWLEDGE = BURNING KNOWLEDGE and = CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY . I will persist with hundreds of new topics with different names.

Science and its wonders converting the nature from PEACE to DESTRUCTION . You can all quote the past,and the present EVIDENCE OF SCIENTIFIC DESTRUCTION ON THE. GLOBE.

NATURAL SELECTION the last said so SOPHISTICATE MISSILE in the hand of scientists launched against REALITY .

Soon shall it be the fall of SCIENTIFIC EMPIRE . The collapse of NATURAL SELECTION DOGMAS_the pseudo scientific religion ...

The popularity of science emerge as a result of human greediness and selfishness ,permitting the wonders of science to launch their TREMENDOUS ALTERATIONS to the INTELLIGENT ,PERFECT and ABSOLUTE DESIGN of NATURE. With an IGNORANT understanding of the MATHEMATICALLY COMPLICATED DESIGN of NATURE launched war against the SETTINGS and RESTRICTIONS of NATURE.

NATURAL SELECTION the baseless assertion . Why the nature create not of cars,computers,cooking materials etc? If natural selection does matter,what of ARTIFICIAL SELECTION ?? scientists did nothing morethan making CORRECTIONS to nature. Those and similar scientific activities brought noting more than destruction to both nature and humanity . GLOBAL WARMING and NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES are slight examples. Which out of the two is suppose to be GUILTY,the NATURAL SELECTION or the ARTIFICIAL SELECTION ? When shall it be the time for the science to COMPENSATE HUMANITY ?

Morning everyone Whenever a scientist invent,discover,or postulate he quickly announce to the public that he is the pioneer of such thing,this is where the question arouse, FOR THE JUSTICE to be in the right place.WHO IS THE INVENTOR OF THIS said so intelligent SCIENTIEST? We spend many years trying to copy the creation of human body in the form of ROBOT,but our scientific work seem SHAMEFUL. If there exist the inventor of ROBOT,there must be the inventor of SCIENTIST . PREJUDICE in LOGICAL assumption will never led humanity to the right way. WE HUMAN usually claiming the possession of something BASE ON THE WITNESSES of our SENSE,meantime DENYING THE CLAIMED PROPOSED BY THE INTELLIGENT MIND that invent the BRAIN of EINTEIN,the PLUTO and BARICAL assertions. Ty

If science counsel us to disagree religion no body else no matter who is he to ENSLAVE OUR FREE THINKING WILL .thus representing himself as either:- God of astromy Prophet of physics IDol of math or anyone else. Am just waiting for good REASONING that will benefit HUMANITY as a whole REGARDLESS of someone CREED. WE ARE FREE THINKERS

Thanks mr nope for your view,but regarding thinniness of light or thickness is not a matter of controversy. The truth cannot be restricted in the hand of some astronomers/cosmologies since they might not be the messengers of the true secret of existence. Furthermore,as a matter of logical assumption in other to pass a particular theory,if possibly an observer reach the farthest distance to the limit of physical element,then there exist null evidence that the observer can be able to perceive infinity of the universe nor can the observer able to trespass the boundary of NO SENSORY organs perception.

Everyone knows that there exist an end to visibility whenever he look at the sky If even no one put into account the beginning of existence. NOMATTER how many room of universes exist,and also it does not matter that if you start from one point you will probably return to the starting point,according to Einstein theory.The situation defends on the border of visibility and how a thinking mind capable of perceiving invisibility and what is beyond the INVISIBILITY BORDER. By visibility here I mean that any perception of element.And by invisibility anything non element like soul.

I have to ask some before further explanation Why should something begin and has no end? Does existence has a starting point? Why should extinction govern the nature of existence? I think that there exist only single mind,as such of the example of said so dreaming man he create his new universe containing things and events while dreaming. And the man believe that he is in real universe while he is dreaming. HOW CAN SOMEONE PROVE THAT THIS said so UNIVERSE is not the result of DREAMING ACTIVITY of a SINGLE INTELLIGENT MIND