Imparticle

I didn't say that at all. In fact, just the opposite. The observable effect is all order and all things that exist; in a word, the effect is the pattern. My response to that is: Everything that possibly can occur, does occur--why?--because that's what the word possible means. And everything that can occur is interconnected--why?--because it all originates in the same principle, that is to say, possibility. And what creates this possibility? You can use many words to point at this thing, this principle, but inherently it recluses from them, it does not hold onto words, because that which originates all possibility has no possibility of its own. All this possibility, all this infinite variation must come from something, everything has origination.

I think the most obvious theoretical prediction would be, no matter what process you use, you cannot ultimately separate any two events. You also can't isolate any two objects from one another, at their fundamental level. In one way or another, any two objects have an indirect, fundamental relationship that cannot be broken. To my thoughts, the truth of this prediction doesn't need to be observable, because it seems given to me. Although there are many observable examples of this throughout our everyday life... I'm finding it difficult to identify the part of an experiment that is: "the infinitely valueless hyper-quantum particle." I can't think of a process in an experiment that would indicate the involvement of the imparticle. That's why I think it's limited to speculation, inasmuch as I understand it... Although I do consist that imparticles must be said to exist, in spite of their supposed undetectability. Juju.

-zero-2-one.com I think my Imparticle Singularity Principle (see imparticle theory) may have some correspondence, somewhere in the depths of the thoughts composing this paragraph. It revolves around an infinitely valueless, hyper-quantum particle... Admittedly, this theory of ten dimensions with parallel universes is interesting, but I myself have not been able to find, nor has there been provided to me by anyone, a true cause to speculate that parallel universes exist. You approach a fork in the road. You can choose to go left, or right, relative to your own body. Let's say you choose right. Now, there is no true cause to speculate that the mere fact of the variation actually spawned an alternate universe in which you turned left. There is no reason to suggest that an infinite number of universes unfolded out of the variables in this instance. Yes, there are hypothetical realities, but what cause is there to be alternate realities that are not hypothetical? Everything that exists, exists. That is indubitable. Based on that fact, how can one justify the notion of independent worlds existing parallel to the one that really exists? Time is not a line. Everything that possibly can occur, does occur--why?--because that's what the word possible means. And everything that can occur is interconnected--why?--because it all originates in the same principle, that is to say, possibility. And what creates this possibility? You can use many words to point at this thing, this principle, but inherently it recluses from them, it does not hold onto words, because that which originates all possibility has no possibility of its own. All this possibility, all this infinite variation must come from something, everything has origination. In a scientific framework, we must use this principle as our hinge. In regards to this principle, the ten-dimension theory consists that instead of one "infinitely valueless" particle, there are an infinite number of them. My response to that is: Well, naturally there an infinite number of valueless particles exist, but since they cannot fundamentally ever be extracted or disassociated with each other, they are effectively only one valueless particle. They are equal to zero and infinity and one. That is what scientifically permits them to originate the infinitude of possibility that exists. And some scientists come along and say other realities exist parallel to this reality, because they represent everything in terms of lines, they say the universe is linear. I speculate that every possible variation not only happens, but is contained within the interconnected sphere of reality, and I have put forth my cause for such speculation. That said, what is the cause for the speculation of parallel realities? Juju.

Hm. Perhaps after some discussion I could begin to formulate some sort of experiment. At this stage, it's been largely speculative and it's difficult to find grounds for an experiment insofar as I've tried. Thanks for the suggestion. Juju.

It begins with the imparticle. The imparticle is invisible, having no distinct qualities, having no energy or value. Since we can't identify an imparticle, we have to imagine one. Together with an infinite number of imparticles, it constructs the world. Imparticles have no inherent qualities and can never be scrutinized or quantified in themselves. Since an imparticle has no value or distinct qualities, it is actually equal to every imparticle, an infinite amount, and it cannot be said to be distinct from any one of them. They are altogether interchangeable. Because imparticles have no distinction, they are forced to bond together, and because they have no value, it takes no energy to do this, and so it happens instantaneously. It takes no time for imparticles to bond. That said, imparticles cannot stay bound because they have no energy, thus they disband from each other. And again, this takes no energy and occurs instantaneously. So every single imparticle throughout the world convulses instantaneously, each one of them being identical to an infinite number of them, putting every pattern in the world together and breaking it down. Not only biological patterns, not only atomic patterns, and radio wave patterns, but also mental patterns, mathematical patterns, and even abstract patterns. This engenders to law of imparticle singularity, which consists that nothing can ever be separated because it is composed of imparticles and all imparticles are effectively contained within each other (more or less). I call it the Imparticle Singularity Principle. In so many words, it means everything is intrinsically intertwined at the most fundamental level. *Indeed, this principle is where all my theoretical understanding of science begins. This also explains why alterations in patterns, and time, or duration, occurs. The imparticles convulse into every possible pattern simultaneously--why every possible pattern?--there cannot possibly be an actual order to the convulsion of imparticles. Moreover, any convulsion occurs instaneously and cannot be consecutive. All patterns occur at the same time, at once. But our brains, being composed of patterns themselves, naturally do not perceive the world this way. Thus there is time. So it is that imparticles compose the world, invisible empty particles that cannot be identified but must be there in order for things to exist. Feedback on this would help me. See, I've been trying for a long time to branch out from this theory, to reach other conclusion besides the Imparticle Singularity Principle (as described previously). Time is very important in regards to this, and might represent several branches of imparticle theory. I have speculated for many years and continue to speculate that all time is simultaneous, and is somehow generated by imparticles, or rather the convulsion thereof--WHOA. What I need is stepping stones.