Ashish

Its really happened with me that our current theories of physics, such as the Standard Model or relativity, are flawed and present some alternative of mine too. As you wrote that "However, when coming up with a new theory it is important that it should be better than the old one. Therefore the first step of coming up with a new theory is a sufficient understanding of the old one. You have to make sure that your new theory does everything at least as well as the old theory, otherwise the old theory remains more attractive. This is very difficult mainly because our current theories are so spectacularly good in their predictions." For this I want to tell you that the word "Particle and Wave", confused me so much that I started having a great studies of it (even though I'm a final year student of Engineering in Information Technology) so as to get what the previously scientists used to imagine to make the theories come upto right way i.e what idea had strucked them. And now I'm steping in this by sufficient understanding of the old one. Whether there is wave or not and If I say that there is nothing like a wave in this whole universe, then I've to explain all the theories such as 1)Interference 2)Diffraction 3)Reflection 4)Refraction 5)Dispersion 6)Polaraization in particles (with some new idea), as Newton introduced the concept of corpuscules. And then comes the 1)Photoelectric effect 2)Compton effect..... and so on till now we are assuming the idea of Einstien (photon) and DeBroglie's Equation. Then this has to be followed to persuade scientists that the Standard Model is wrong, then you have to explain why this is a coincidence or show that your new theory predicts to at least this accuracy.