Pincho Paxton

Thanks for keeping the ball rolling Pincho. My overall model asserts that only substance by contact or physical connection can create what we presently call a force

//

I have entropy as the force. A membrane surrounding the particles is the feedback loop (the bubbles that I have been using) When Aether overlaps it raises the energy at that overlap position. the raise in energy travels to the membrane outside, and bounces back. the bounce back pushes the particles apart again. Entropy.

Yes I've designed a test of the speed of light up vs. down. For this I need very precise timing devices which I believe I have found, accurate to a couple billionths of a second, and some extruded fiber optic material that slows down the speed of light be a factor of about a 1000. Instead of the speed of light through it being 186,000 miles per second, it would be about 2000 miles per second. Such materials do exist but maybe not 2 pieces of high quality material, both need to be a mile long. No other model of gravity or test for aether predicts a difference in aether or light speed to such a small extent, up vs. down of about 60 feet per second difference, or ~41 mph.

 

It will likely be 2 years or longer before I will be able to conduct such an experiment based upon the time and money needed to do it.

,,

 

 

 

I certainly agree. The simpler answer is usually the better answer. There are no "a priori" forces of any kind in my over-all cosmology model. Magnetism in all of its facets is also accordingly a pushing force concerning a background field aether.

Yes, magnetism is also a push force.

If time was 1 dimensional you wouldn't get time displacement to work from a moving body that can move in 3 dimensions. And Einstein thought that time was relative, so not constant. Then later you adjust the speed of light to time flow, so again you are using a 3D timeflow because light travels in 3D, so you are not sticking to your own theory.But the sun jets part could be true. Time varies by relative movement, so jets fired towards you could alter your relative time reference, and telescopes do exhibit a strange phase shift. It's called the aberration of light, but I call it the aberration of time.

The pushing gravity thing is fun a fun but old theory...has anyone come up with a physical test yet?

If you had two spherical particles, and you were told to make one particle move the other particle, what would you do?To make them pull you have to add some invisible magic. But pushing them is easy. The easy answer is don't add invisible magic to the Universe, if you have a way to do the same thing without any magic.

It would seem to work the same way with pushing gravity. When inside a building there is a little bit of pushing toward the walls and a little less pushing on you, not perceptible to any degree, but still there. Inside a spherical shell you would be pushed in all directions equally toward the outer shell so you would not move. Accordingly there could be no space without the ZPF, in this case an aether. As you said, there seems to be little difference concerning pushing and pulling gravity. Pushing gravity is called a mechanical explanation of gravity which it would seem that pulling gravity could never be. I don't believe there are any other known mechanical explanations of gravity.

 

 

The Pushing gravity model is not a "a priori" force. It is simply that this pushes that, which pushes that ... and so on. And acceleration of gravity is extremely simple. The vector toward matter is greater than the force pushing away from matter so a continuous net force is applied to matter in an inward direction, which causes matter to accelerate which we describe as gravity.

 

 

You are correct. I do not need to have an aether to explain the inward pushing of gravity as a force, but "force theory" is always infinitely more complicated than simple mechanical theory. All past pushing gravity models including my own, us particulates like dark matter, for the pushing process. In aether theory the aether along can explain everything, including matter, EM radiation, and all of reality including the laws of physics, all by the simplest of explanations.

 

 

As far as I'm concerned, how it is explained must be based solely upon observation and logic, and any other reason for explanations I think should run a distant third Accordingly everything that exists in the whole universe is simple to understand and explain! excepting when trying to make a mathematical estimation of it for prediction purposes

 

 

I use different names for a physical aether field in my model, but usually I call it a Pan Field, because I call the most fundamental particles (like the "god-particle, aka Higg's particle) Pan. A string of these particles I call a Pan Chain. So as a field I call them collectively concerning a particular volume, a Pan Field. But for the purposes of this discussion I think I should call it simply an aether so that I don't need to discuss details of the whole theory, just details of the pushing gravity model

Well, your model is almost identical to mine.

You might like my video..

I also know how to make the mathematical model for it, but there isn't a computer powerful enough to run it, considering that the Aether is so abundant.

The entire model is a field hypothesis concerning the Zero Point Field, which accordingly is space containing a large number of physical entities like the dark matter hypotheses. So accordingly I can't get rid of them because they are the only thing that exists, period. These particles in the field are accordingly the elementary particulates that when forming looped strings of the same particle, make-up all matter (no quarks or gluons), and they have a mechanical innate motivator that causes them to unwind. Once these strings of particles are forced into loops they spin and we can observe them as atomic particles or otherwise.

 

There accordingly is nothing else in all of reality. They collectively comprise everything, the whole of the universe. This one particle type forms all matter as well as all of finite space, in their vast numbers. Everything in reality can be explained and/ or defined by this single simple particle alone, including the beginning of time. Accordingly nothing else exists! So to get rid of them I would end up with nothing at all, which accordingly is an impossible state of existence/ reality

 

Since this is a pushing gravity model, there needs to be something pushing from all sides, right? You can call this an aether hypotheses/ model (a type of dark matter model if you like) involving the physical particulates and mechanics of pushing gravity. It has many similarities to older pushing gravity models which also required particulates to do the pushing

//

Oh I see. yes I use those fields in my theory, I just don't call them fields, I would more likely call them chains, that's all, because they are linked particles. So I didn't know what you meant.

I trace the first sense back to particles bumping together. They have to have a feedback system that they bumped, so I would call the first sense entropy.

Yeah it's a good theory. I don't know why you have all these Pan fields though. They seem too helpful to your theory, like they have been thrown in to tie up loose ends. There's a simpler solution to get rid of them.

Yes I agree with this. The site is doing well today, two things that actually make sense.

Yes, sounds about right.

Earth is a rare winning streak. 1,2,3,4,5,6 on the lotto is 14 million to 1. It's exact alignments that seem to bother you. I don't think that DNA needs exact alignments. Obviously it is reversible.. 6,5,4,3,2,1. Then it is most likely rearrangeable 456123. And then it is also rebuildable in new ways. And then it is possibly formable everywhere in the Universe, and just need the right planet. If you really did calculate this based on Earth the odds would be 1/1. not even 50/50, but 100%.

I don't believe that energy can rise, or fall, only balance out. Distance between energy can rise, so you can have expansion. Between that expansion you could have negative mass, and positrons, also balancing out in reverse. And that is what is missing from the calculations, the reverse properties of energy, and mass.

The Bow shock of a moving object towards Gravity in more detail. As you can see, the bump gravity does not produce drag because the Dark Flow creates a negative force that eliminates the drag.

Look at my previous picture. The overlap of the Aether is the change of an X/Y/Z coordinate. The Aether knows it has has a head on collision because the overlap will be bigger, and return a larger result.

The freedom of movement for the Aether can be moved. If you hit the front of the Aether, the freedom of movement is at the back, if you hit the back of the Aether, the freedom of movement is easier at the front. It does depend on location however. If the Aether is already under pressure from the back, and you hit the front, the Aether will just shrink out of the way instead, and eventually become negative. Once it is negative it is free again, but can now hit negative particles. Negative particles travel in the other direction.

An X/Y/Z coordinate (The Aether) is a pressure point, taken from the whole Universal bubble membrane. If you increase that pressure point by overlap, the membrane will become slightly stretched. It will then naturally reduce that pressure point back to a zero pressure on the Universal membrane. hence action at a distance, where a pressure point is carried over a large distance, and hidden from a result until observed. The universal bubble membrane then zeros that result on both particles. But you could also say that the Galactic bubble membrane acts first, or even a solar bubble membrane. But they all work together in the end.

Action At A Distance explained!

I can actually explain all of quantum physics as physics.

A diagram to cover some of the things that we have gone over so far...

The Aether is everything, there is nothing else. No other particles, just Aether in different amounts, folding, and crossing. So when I explain a single part of my theory, it covers everything else. The Aether is a trinary network, that can only be reconstructed as a computer program. To describe it in maths terms, is very difficult, because you have absolutely no measurements, you have no weight, you have no size. The Aether shape-shifts. How the Aether creates all particles is a matter of using the trinary code that it is using to create the Universe. Here is an example of the electron being created by Aether overlap...

The electron is a result of overlapping Aether. It has reason, and that reason being X/Y/Z locations are taken directly from Aether particles. It's like shining a torch around a darkened room, and calling the circle of light an origin. As you move the torch it is lighting up varying amounts of mass, but you are supposed to think of the mass as changing in a stationary beam of light because that is still the origin of that X/Y/Z location. So when Aether overlaps, it breaks the zero rule of the Universe, and it is creation. The Aether must always amount to zero total, and it overlaps negative mass to maintain that state. An overlap in this case creates an electron, and because the Aether is a spherical grain, it stacks spherically. The number of particles that can touch same size is 12 around 1. Around the circumference their are 6 Aether particles on a single plane. The orbit of the electron is the 6 pronged bump of Aether, and under cold conditions this leads to the snowflake as the Aether has flow in direction of least resistance, and the Aether is under pressure from the flow of Gravity, and the gravity makes a vertical plane, and the result is 2D-ish.

I'll get round to writing the program soon, and eventually produce an atom.

My personal theory says that a black hole is a negative version of mass. Mass can fold into negative form, and it does this because space has a pressure of its own, because it is infinite. And this fold creates Galaxies.. you don't even need a big bang. Just add Dark Matter, which I prefer to call Aether.

That experiment is widely accepted to have been the nail in the coffin for aether theories. So how is it that you are using this experiment to give the opposite conclusion? Explain the mechanics, with mathematical justification, of how your aether theory is in line with the MM experiment.

+1 mass

-1 negative mass

Mass can bump mass.

Negative mass can bump negative mass.

Mass moves into negative mass.

Negative mass can move through positive mass.

Negative mass can create a hole through positive mass allowing positive mass to enter positive mass through that hole.

Positive mass bumps out an electron, and positive mass shrinks by that electron mass.

Negative mass bumps out a positron, and negative mass expands by the mass of that positron.

Negative mass is a hole that positive mass can move into, it is an atom.

This is a Turing machine, and...

+1

0

-1

....is the Trinary code that creates everything.

+1 mass

-1 Negative mass

0 = zero space.

Zero space is a location that is empty.

All mass can move into zero space.

Zero space is a Black Hole. It is the area of least resistance for mass, and negative mass.

Mass has to fold into negative mass if it shrinks to negative.

Negative mass can expand into mass if it becomes positive.

That's the logic commands. It's a solid computer program.

what is the probability of the hole occuring infront of a photon? if a hole doesn't appear does light just get blocked, does it slow down what happens to the light that should be getting to us? This phenomena should be observable as dark patches in the sky.. no?

The photon was pointed towards the Earth in that experiment. If you point the photon in another direction, the area of least resistance is in the new direction.. the bending of space-time, the movement of Aether towards holes creating such a bend. It's like throwing a ball through a waterfall into a cave.. there is a force that can be overcome by speed.

I agree. Pincho Paxton must first establish the existence of the aether before he can say anything about how it affects gravity.

 

Pincho Paxton: Are you familiar with the Michelson-Morley experiment?

Yes I based my Aether theory on that experiment. The photon should move from its direct orbit to the Earth based on the Aether no being in motion with the surrounding planets.

I not only fixed that problem I also fixed relativity, and the bending of space-time like this..

Atoms are a pressure in the Aether that has folded the Aether into a negative mass state... tiny holes in the Aether that the Aether can move into. If the Aether moves into holes in atoms it then creates a motion towards the centre of those atoms. This creates an angular momentum towards the Earth... Gravity. The Morley experiment didn't account for the photon travelling towards the point of least resistance in the Aether.. atom holes. If the Earth is moving, and the Aether is travelling into atom holes, all that is happening is that a new hole is moving in front of the photon. Just like loading a 6 shooter, the photon can just continue on its path. This also creates the exact same bending of space time as gravity moves into the Earth.

Gravity is an attractional force associated with mass, it cannot change direction to "outwards". If gravity weakens then things will still be attracted downwards but perhaps not as agressively as it could have been.

 

How do you suggest that gravity was to change direction? What mechanism do you have to explain this phenomenon?

 

I'd also imagine a creature evolving in a low gravity environment to be far less muscular than a creature evolved to deal with high gravity too and i'd hypothesise that it would have less need for rounded padding on it's feet than a heavy creature that needs to protect it's feet. I feel if anything that low gravity would mean more fragile flat feet than the other way around.

Forget outwards gravity, its antimatter, and doesn't matter, I just needed an example.

Well the muscles would be related to the gravity, and the weight of the creature in that gravity. The elephant, and rhino are fat creatures. The T-rex is tall and slim.. again there is a difference. The brontosaurus is fat, but huge.. again a ratio that looks exact in proportion to the change in gravity. Triceratops is fat, but has normal feet. What about mammoth compared to elephant? The mammoth actually has longer feet!

You are using evolution for the feet without adding gravity to that evolution. You need both.

And so would the dinosaur itself and so everything, relatively speaking should work the same, no mass values have changed.

 

I dont think the compressibility of a material is affeced by gravity, rather Geologic materials are made up of two portions: solids and voids (or same as porosity). The void space can be full of liquid or gas. Geologic materials reduces in volume only when the void spaces are reduced, which expel the liquid or gas from the voids. This can happen over a period of time, resulting in settlement.

 

Less gravity doesn't mean more compressibility.

Gravity is a directional force. If it is down to the Earth the feet go flatter. Now to visualise the foot change you have to go to the extreme. Imagine gravity being so weak that it changes directions to an outwards force. Now the tops of the feet elongate outwards (I know its odd). But by using the strange scenario, we can extrapolate that in the middle there is a round toed version.

Curved soles suggests to me that the ground the dinosaur stepped in when the fossil was made was soft when it happened.

But the wider toes would still show up. Anyway the ground would be lighter as well under less gravity.There is a mis-match of what we see today.Take the Brontosaurus, that has elephant feet, but it is huge compared with an elephant.

How does a bird (especially a flightless one) get up after it falls down?

The effort increases with scale, there is a tipping point. Although evolution does throw out wobblies, like beetles, and tortoise. But I am more interested in the feet. Lets go for Emu feet, they are close to dinosaur feet, but the bottoms of the feet flatten out. The dinosaur imprints don't flatten out so much, but they are much greater in scale. To have curved soles suggests lower gravity. If you scale the Emu feet up you should end up with large, flat bases. Because pressure creates off-springs I suggest that you can scale feet up to suggest pressure. Maybe you can even scale that pressure up to get the amount, and scale of Galaxy spirals as well.

I'm fairly certain snowflakes are hexagonal because of the properties of the hydrogen bonds in the water atom.

 

How is Aether pressure gravity, and what evidence do you have of this. In what way is gravity counter acted by magnetism and how does it affect your theory. Why isn't the bone density of all early animals much lower due to the lower pressure of gravity?

Hydrogen bonds are also the same release of pressure, and so are electrons in their creation of orbits.

Aether is much like a liquid, and is like a sea pressure, but much lower, but it is infinite, so creates infinite pressure. The pressure created the Galaxies, because the infinite pressure folds into Black Holes. The black holes cannot contain the material that falls into them, so the material is reduced in scale, and then escapes as magnetism (Dark Flow). The escaping pressure creates the bubble around the Galaxy. The pressure on the bubble then creates pounding waves. The pounding waves then create more pressure inside the bubble. The black hole spins the material out as a disc spiral. The spinning material creates more holes in the aether. The holes then allow more material inside, and creates suns, and planets. All of the atoms etc. The escaping materials create more bubbles. The bubbles now counteract more pressure. This ends up as a bubble wrap to protect us from the huge pressures of infinite Aether. The bubbles however are slightly unstable. A meteor, or comet for example can break through them. If something big happened to a bubble it would alter Gravity. The dinosaurs must have experience a break in the bubble chain, and the pressure must have suddenly dropped on them, and killed them.

The bone density must have been filled over time by high pressure which gives them the appearance of normal density as they have become filled by new material internally, and externally. Take a look at the creatures around us.. birds (light) have three toes. Camels (Heavy) have two pressurized toes. Elephants (very heavy) have compressed toes. Fish (Under pressure of the sea) have toes that have squeezed out as fins. Humans (in the middle) have the toes of Dinosaurs, but with the extra digits squeezed out.

My theory predicts that Gravity is a pressure from the Universe, not an attractive force. And for a few years now I have been deciding if that pressure has changed over time.

Since I was a child I have often wondered how T-Rex managed to get up off the floor if it fell over. It has those reduced arms, and a heavy back end. It looks like it would be hard work to get up. And since my gravity theory is channeled through bubbles like bubble-wrap which protects us from a huge pressure from the Universe I had been thinking that pressure on the dinosaurs may have been less. This would account for their huge size, and predict their downfall. But apart from their size I had little to go on. But this...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110809104301.htm

... picture reminded me that they had three toes. Now my theory also predicts that pressure creates off-springs that are forced out of the Aether. Snowflakes for example are the 6 sided shapes produced by Aether pressure in cold conditions, and Aether pressure is Gravity, which is counter acted by magnetism (which is also Dark Flow). Another theory this week...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110810085501.htm

... shows how alternating pressure from holes produces such crystals. And from all of my information put together, and the three toes of the dinosaurs which would fit inside our hand print. I can conclude that our extra two digits are a force pressure from extra gravity.