MrSandman

Notice the word hydrogen in my post not OXYGEN.

Ha, who has been feeding you the crap that Evolution hasn't been not provened false???? It isn't sound evidence 'cause you don't have a sound starting. There is so much we don't know. Never has a species evovled into another species. Again, I say, "NEVER". Never has the accounts of the bible been provened wrong.The dead sea scrolls (Oldest known manuscript) had all but to differences when compared with the bible. The earth can be very old, but life how we know has only been around since God created it in Genesis. Evolution thrives off the big bang. But what's before the big bang? Dust? Where did that come from? You don't have the foggiest. God told abraham that wash you hands was very important. It wasn't discover till the 18th century why it was important. Proving that the bible has accurate accounts. The bible said the earth was round. It took thousands of years for them to prove it. Everyone else thought it was flat. Do I need to keep going on about what in the bible has been provened as a scientific fact? No one knows exactly what starts the process of DNA. It had to be started some where and given a push. That's what God did. You probably don't know about this 'cause you never read the bible.

10 milliters of solution. 3% of which is hydrogen peroxide that means that the hydrogen level is even less. But saying it was 3% pure hydrogen would mean. It would cover a space of 3 milliters of space. You average balloon is way more than that. I know before I didn't add much, but this makes perfect since why it didn't work. !d0!+

Amino acids are zwitterions i.e. they will have both positive charge as well as negative charge. For example ,Alanine

 

 

 

 

In the case of peptides,

 

 

I don't see anywhere the molecule losing or gaining an electron, However the electrons of bonded nitrogen are shared between two C-atoms and one H-atoms and has two lone pair of electrons. The amine group is protonated and the carboxyl group is deprotonated.

Cytochromes have Fe+++ and Fe++ ions which alternately get reduced and oxidised and there by transfering electrons. It is one of the member of electron transport chain.

 

 

 

Amino acids are zwitterions i.e. they will have both positive charge as well as negative charge. For example ,Alanine

 

 

 

 

In the case of peptides,

 

 

I don't see anywhere the molecule losing or gaining an electron, However the electrons of bonded nitrogen are shared between two C-atoms and one H-atoms and has two lone pair of electrons. The amine group is protonated and the carboxyl group is deprotonated.

 

 

I do look harder I'll reply later got to get to class.

There is remenants, but no actual visual observation of one.

The mass couldn't be changed that much it isn't possible. Not to mention one of saturn's moon is rotating the opposite direction. Most of the others are rotating another way. Protons can't go into each other they have mass!

I'm not saying that it is a solid 25,000 it actually could be only 6,000, but that is very hard to explain. The temperture change in different times of the year is the rays aren't as direct. However, one second of the sun's heat at this distance could barbeque everything. Saying that it being that close would make us freeze over is absurd. I'll take a 10 million candle watt flashlight and hold five feet away from you. You would definitely feel it.

In 1979, scientists Eddy and Boornazian announced that their studies of solar measurement records from Greenwich Observatory in England, and the US Naval Observatory in Washington, conclusively showed that the sun was shrinking. Its diameter was decreasing at a rate of almost six feet per hour.

Yeah, proving that they want to be like noble gases.

No one has ever seen an exploding star at least not one that destroyed it's self.

God being as smart as he is created things so they could adapt, if they don't adapt fast enough they die. I know about evolution to some extint. Have you tried reading the bible? It has been provened true over 2000 times by prohecies that were provened by archealogy. There isn't enough evidence to back evolution. They never had a species change from one to another. They took a fruit fly and altered it to have no wings. Does this mean it isn't a fly, but another species. No. Why would I study a Religion to understand science unless the religion has proof and no contradictions. Natural selection isn't even proof for evolution.

Well it doesn't prove that the earth is 4.3 billions years old the sun would have been so close that there would be no oceans. It would be like having organisms in molten lava living. It goes to show that it couldn't have been over 25,000 years ago. You also forgot that the sun is shrinking. This doesn't give enough time for anything to evolve. No way it could have been billions.

Micro Evolution just because it has the same name doesn't make it the same as Macro Evolution. It isn't proof at all. Saying evolution is a RELIGION is perfectly accurate because you do not know how it arrived at it's present state. You think that it is possible to have a slime mold to form two perfect eyes the idea is perfectly absurd. Not to mention you can't have all the mass in the universe compressed into a size of a period. It isn't possible it goes against several laws.

Reply to Phill: If you would explain more on your questions I could possibly find contradictions.

Formula=

100_____x

----- = ------ or 100:28=x:52 or 100/28=x/52

28_____52

cross multiply and divide

Have questions on how I got it ask. It's nothing to do with decent.

However, that wouldn't work because light is particles(at least they think so) and must hit something and bounce off it at 90degrees to hit the camera to make the photo. You know that light doesn't reflect off air. Now, you think I'll just mist the area. Then you don't need the Camera. Cuz, you be able to see it. However, here is something you can do:

Take the high speed Camera

Mist an area.

Point the laser going perpendicular to the camera and start

the camera, and have the laser start with it and end with it. Now, you should have a video of the light traveling through the mist.

You guys are making a discussion out of nothing. The call a circle a circle and a sphere a sphere. A cube a cube, and a square a square. they would relate their names if they really wanted you to know the relation. Want another problem take a Pryamid and Triangle, what about those?

Not to mention this big bang was God mocking baloons it didn't get big then blow, it condensed and blew.

Man sorry make sure the person has higher math skills then you before you take their advice. I'm 16. You think can't know much about algebra. I say I'm taking college algrebra Math105. You think this guy should know prealgebra. Now, using what HallsofIvory told you: solve this equation

(4--6)6^5=x

4--6=10

When you have two negatives they come together to make a positive--=+ iff there right next to each other.

Then go to the Exponents 6^5

6*6*6*6*6*6

use calc or your head

6*6=36

36*6=216

216*6=1296

1296*6=7776

Okay now you got that done. So your equation should look like this

(10)7776=x

x=77760

A much harder equation same method.

Tip: If you have a scientific Claculator there is a ^ button this means "to raise to" so you hit 5 then hit the ^ button the hit 2 then hit = or enter to get 25.

That first guy must have been worse at math than you.

at 45*c the rate of production of amino acid is 98mg dm-3).

Is the rate per hour?

I'm sorry that I don't have enough training, but I'll do my best. Evolution may prove certain things, but can't ignore what contradicts it. Like for instance the Sun is moving away and shrinking at a consistent rate. If you calculate both you get a number of 25,000 years ago. What do you get past that? A world devoid of any biomolecular structure, because the sun would be so close that it would kill anything else living. A biological clock isn't accurate. They assume that the rate of change on earth has stayed the same. Can they prove this? No, it isn't possible. It would be the same as saying that a car moving 60mph has always been moving that fast.

Explain the existence of pseudogenes? Gladly, God made them. Maybe not them exactly, but a common ancestor similiar to them. Like a tocan has a bird as a common ancestor. God made things able to adapt, so it would seem logical for microevolution to exist.

Yeah, but what does mayan religion have to do with it? JK, lol. Anyways, people spend a huge amount of time debating it when they could be out finding new cool science facts.

ROFL!!!!!

I like it very comical. Maybe he destroyed the "CUF" and then made the big bang that shot him

Here's a site with a lil help. I'm taking Bio 121 and I'm only 16.

http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/

EC 1.12.1 With NAD+ or NADP+ as acceptor

Contents

EC 1.12.1.1 now EC 1.18.99.1

EC 1.12.1.2 hydrogen dehydrogenase

EC 1.12.1.3 hydrogen dehydrogenase (NADP+)

[EC 1.12.1.1 Transferred entry: now EC 1.18.99.1 hydrogenase (EC 1.12.1.1 created 1965, deleted 1972)]

EC 1.12.1.2

Accepted name: hydrogen dehydrogenase

Reaction: H2 + NAD+ = H+ + NADH

Other name(s): H2:NAD+ oxidoreductase; NAD-linked hydrogenase; bidirectional hydrogenase; hydrogenase

Systematic name: hydrogen:NAD+ oxidoreductase

Comments: An iron-sulfur flavoprotein (FMN or FAD). Some forms of this enzyme contain nickel

http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/

Basically, they classify it on what it reacts with and how it reacts with it.

It is absurd, but not entirely.

You keep going back to try to figure out where everything came from you get two things GOD or NOTHING.

Most likely not so. Your camera needs light to make the picture so the shutter speed being faster just gives you a dark picture. If you have a really bright room already then place the camera to look at the laser(head on). you could possibly see evidence of the light traveling. Side ways I'm pretty sure would cause lots of problems. Actually, you wouldn't be able to see the beam until close to where it hits the object.

Meet MrSandman a CREATIONIST!!!!!!!

Both Evolution and Creation can't be provened proving both are RELIGIONS. However, Evolution has been provened wrong on several accounts. Creation on the other hand hasn't. Ask me questions. I'm young, but have enough knowledge to tackle most of Evolutionist's Beliefs.

Polictics, Religions (Evolution, and Creation) should keep away (unless provened by facts) from science!!!! Tell me whatever you want. I got the time to answer.

You in highschool it has been a while. I'm a freshmen taking bio 121.

Are all the electrons shells stripped of electrons, no.

There is the special section on the periodic table called the noble gases they are He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, and Rn. They are not striped of any of it's valence electrons. All the other ones want to become like noble gases.

Li has the highest chance to bond with Cl.

Hope this helps a little, I know more, but not quite sure. Expand more on your questions.