One_Warrior

Abstract Draws attention to the fact of a methodological unreasonableness in direct comparisons of space-time parameters in two systems moving past one another with a relativistic velocity. Lorentz’s transformations are qualified in this connection as the subjective - illusory interrelations which do not have the appearance of an objective reality. Problems for an extraneous objective observer are exhibited. In total, known paradoxical absurdities are eliminated and special relativity acquires simplicity. Scales of critical attacks and remarks addressing the well-known theory of special relativity have recently acquired so imposing a scope that it is right to speak about an approaching crisis. Gradually to an increasing number of scientists, the numerous imperfections of this theory and the dead state of the scientific methodology introduced by it become apparent. Apparently, it is time to seriously upgrade STR and to subject it to corrective revision. With what is it necessary to begin? In a rebuke to writers on STR, the fact was repeatedly put that they were really mathematicians rather than physicists. In building the theory, the formula of Lorentz‘s transformations already prevailed, and they tried "to adjust" reality to them. And as the selection had been initially made, all other alternatives "had been simply killed off and it had unwittingly blocked off a road to them. Thus, the deductive "mathematical" methodology prevailed. Frankly, positivistic philosophical-methodological methods absolutizing the observer s position and denying availability of objective characteristics for natural subjects and other phenomena have also played a noxious role. Within the framework of a materialistic methodology, the situation when each of two observers moving past one another would fix alternative spatial and time reductions in the other system and thus would be right, never could be considered. The problem is natural to scientists gravitating to materialism in similar situations: and what takes place in these two systems actually? But instead of an answer, they here receive a positivistic-philosophical "fico": it appears, there is nothing actually; there is only one subjective semblance of the phenomena which is taken as the scientific basis. So, two essential methodological defects which STR promoted created the deadlock observed today. Therefore, it is necessary for us to subject a problem within a relativistic situation to more stringent methodological analysis in which the path to the correct solution can be found. Earlier, in the article “Relativity of Simultaneity Versus Other Relativistic Effects”, we have already identified that creators of STR have demonstrated scandalous tendentiousness in the consideration of specific space-time relativistic effects. They have preferred relative reductions of lengths and reducing periods as main effects, and the effect of a relativity of simultaneity has been pushed into the second plan, and presented in the capacity of being dependent on the first two. For this reason they designedly did not deduce the value of mistiming of clocks, basing the last effect, on the thought experiment with Einstein’s train that would be quite natural and rather simple. Writers on STR have used this experiment qualitatively and the quantitative ratio was deduced later, after obtaining the formulas of Lorentz’s transformations for space and time coordinates. The outcome of this tendentious approach was that the effect of the relativity of simultaneity found itself in the backyard of STR and the methodological specificity introduced by it has remained scantily studied. There was a fatal error in it as will be exhibited below. The specific features introduced by this effect in a methodological situation, appear so considerable, that it causes a radical change in the attitude towards the problem. It is considered that the effect of the relativity of simultaneity s "mistiming" of clocks lays in points along the line of relative motion for two moving systems. Formulas for the value of this mistiming are deduced in STR. However the importance of some details of mistiming for physics, in our opinion reflected badly on the theory. In our preceding article we attempted more deeply to uncover this situation. Actually, the question is that in any points removed from each other along the line of relative motion of two systems, there is a relative distortion and a relative displacement of the time scale. We shall pay attention to the relative displacement. Clearly, in one of the systems, all events happening at any point removed from the origin of coordinates for two systems will happen with relative forestalling, and in other, accordingly, with relative delay. The value of this displacement demonstrates dependence on the relative velocity of the systems and the distances between the points along the line of motion. It is important to realize that the indicated displacement occurs along the trajectory at the same time, changing from point to point. The question is about a new total factor in our time-space perception, a role and value which is very important to evaluate correctly! This total factor essentially distorts our customary cognitive methods. It is necessary to strain our space-time imagination a little to understand it. The special situation generated by the relativity of simultaneity Earlier, we had already drawn attention to the unforeseen problem generated by the effect of the relativity of simultaneity. If we combine the space-time origins of coordinates of two systems at any point (O=O`) then in all remaining points of the line of their relative motion, the relative displacement of the time scale will occur. In outcome synchronize in two systems those events which happen instantaneously in point O=O ` can only. In particular, only the instantaneous values of the vector quantities present at this point can be compared. All remaining events appear with some relative time-shift, and this fact of relative forestalling/delay is necessary for the relative comparison of the two systems. Actually these two systems demonstrate essential relative nonlinearity. Events meet in one point and then change along the x axis. So, with solitary instantaneous events all is simple enough. And how would it be with a simultaneous comparison of two and more events occurring at miscellaneous points in space? Here appears a major problem. The factor of relative forestalling/delay of events in miscellaneous points makes the act of such comparison impossible in principle! What does this imply? The classical act of measurement of spatial parameters implies simultaneous matching of the ends of a measured object with marks on a template. Clearly, that the effect of a relativity of simultaneity makes such classical act of direct measurement in a relativistic situation when the subject and a template are in two systems moving past one another, essentially impossible. We must look into this problem in detail. So, it is methodologically impossible, impermissible, to compare space segments directly in two systems! We have the same problem concerning time increments. Their direct comparison is also methodologically incorrect. All this results in the fact that direct comparison of any processes consisting of two and more events becomes impossible. In particular, it concerns any motion along any non-zero spatial segment or during any non-zero period. And now let's recollect Michelson s experiment and the "strictly scientific" deduction of the well-known Lorentz’s transformations on the basis of its results. In light of the problems found by us, the expectation of experimenters and theoretical-geometrical calculations of the creators of STR look at best, naive or ridiculous. The methodology, with which they were guided, is completely impermissible. It in mechanics of Newton one could join simultaneous processes of motion of a boat and a river (in the classical example of traversing a fast river) in one spatial drawing or a graphic diagram, and then get the resultant velocity from a right triangle. In relativistic mechanics, all this is impermissible! There can be no direct comparisons of spatial segments, periods and processes of motion, especially on one linear diagram! No direct comparisons of vectors spreading in the space and time, of right triangles composed of them and simple formulas of transformations! Specific relative space-time nonlinearity of the worlds, of the parallel flows of a development of events in two systems causes us to refuse former primitive methodological methods and to search for others (probably, indirect) methods of comparison. Events occur in the special time proportions in each of two flows, and the arbitrary transfer, mixing of formulas, and values of variable data are completely impermissible in these flows. So, the correct methodology of direct comparisons does not exist and cannot exist in principle. What then do the formulas of Lorentz’s transformations offer us? Here, each of two moving experimenters independently (subjectively) makes a decision about what instants to consider as the beginning and the end of the act of measurement of a spatial segment or time period within the current process. But for all that, as it has been exhibited in our previous article, the solutions of the two experimenters contradict one another. Therefore it is no wonder that the results of such measurements are different. The situation where each experimenter considers that there are reductions of lengths of segments and periods in the other system is the effect of these subjective comparisons. Apparently, the cognitive value of similar comparisons and measurements is specifically subjective and comparable to the value of routine visual or acoustic illusions. It is given that Lorentz’s transformations are deduced from biased (non-objective) methodology and concern only private subjective - illusionary aspects of reality. They do not suit the extraneous objective observer. Watching for the meaningless measurements of two experimenters moving past one another and knowing about the absence of a correct methodology for direct comparisons, this observer should come inevitably to the conclusion that it is necessary to deny any statement about such comparisons in principle. And in the causes of the illusions of relative reductions, he needs to put forward a progressing relative displacement of the time scale along the line of relative motion of two systems. Then the point at issue will vanish. Then the absurd and irritating paradoxes, over the last hundred years will vanish also. In total, all of special relativity will be reduced to the one indicated phenomenon. Contrasted to the former version, the new special relativity theory appreciably wins in simplicity; therefore there is every reason to call it Special Relativity Lite.

ñåãîäíÿ 9ìàÿ,áîëåå ïîëóâåêà íàçàä íàøè äåäû îòäàëè ñâîþ êðîâü çà ïîáåäó íàä ôàøèñòàìè, òàê ïîìÿí¸ì èõ ñ ÷åñòüþ,ïîêàæåì ìåñòî çàðâàâøåéñÿ ýñòîíèè,âñ¸ ïðàâèòåëüñòâî íàäî ñæå÷ü êàê ñæèãàëè åâðååâ ýññåñîâöû,ääîñ àòàêà è äåôåéñ ìíîãèõ ýñòîíñêèõ ñàéòîâ îðãàíèçîâûâàåò Cyber Antiesstonian Community,ìû òå êòî óïðàâëÿåò ñåòüþ,ìû êîðîëè ñåòè..ìû íèãäå è âåçäå,ìû íå òå áîòàíû î÷êàðèêè,ñêîðåå òå îòìûâàåò áóðæóñêîå áàáëî è åçäèò íà áåõàõ 7 ñåðèè%)) âîîáùå âèäíî òî ÷òî ýòî ãàëèìàÿ ïðîâàêàöèÿ çàòåÿííàÿ usa è èõíåì íàòî Ìû èä¸ì â ïåðâûõ ðÿäàõ ïðîòèâ îáìàí÷èâûõ ïðèíöèïîâ ëîæíîé äåìîêðàòèè íàâÿçàííîé àìåðèêîé,êîòîðàÿ ñòðåìèòüñà çàñóíóòü ñâîþ ðóêó â äåëà êàæäîé ñòðàíû, ñîëäàòû êîòîðîé âåäóò çàõâàòíè÷åñêèå âîéíû, ïî âñåìó ìèðó, è âîþþò îíè íå çà äåìîêðàòèþ êàê îá ýòîì òðåçâîíÿò àìåðèêàíñêàÿ ïðîïàãàíäèñòêàÿ ìàøèíà, à çà âûãîäû ñîâåðøåííî ìàòåðèàëüíûå. Ýòà äâîéíàÿ ìîðàëè àìåðèêàíöåâ ïîêàçûâàåò èñòèííîå ëèöî àìåðèêè,êîòîðàÿ îäíó ðóêó òÿíåò äëÿ ðóêîïîæàòèå, à äðóãîé îòðóáàåò òâîþ ðóêó, êîòîðóþ òû ïðîòÿíóë. Ìíîãèå çäåñü çàñëóæèëè íàãðàäû è îðäåíà,íî íàì îíè íå íóæíû, íàì ãîðàçäî ïðèÿòíèå ñîçíîâàòü ÷òî ìû ñêëàäûâàåì êèðïè÷èêè â çäàíèå ñêëåïà â êîòîðîì áóäåò ïîêîèòüñà àìåðèêà. Ïîýòîìó ãîñïîäà äàé áîã íàì áîëüøèõ óñïåõîâ â íàøåì ñâåòëîì äåëå.. http://www.radiodeejay.hr/forum/lang/inexed.htm STR – the result of impermissible theoretical simplifications Careful analysis of a phenomenon of a relativity of simultaneity reconciles in conclusion, that special relativity (STR) has been received as a result of the whole series of impermissible theoretical simplifications and mistakes. 1). The relativity of simultaneity is effect of special relativity, obviously, right for all "relativistic" situations. And the effect conforming to it should be taken into account strictly, including during a deducing of transformations. When the act of emission of a light signal combine in two systems in time in mental experiments, it is necessary to understand precisely, that all other events concerning movement of this signal, will occur in two systems not so simultaneously, and to the certain time displacement. And value of this displacement depends on a position of a point interesting to us in the space: the further from a zero reference datum on an axis of relative movement of systems, the more displacement value. Meanwhile, at the standard "elementary" conclusion of Lorentz’s transformations from interpretation of Michelson's experience it is thoughtlessly meant, that a light signal, being emitted simultaneously in two reference systems, will simultaneously accepted in them by interferometer too. Without such "simplification", certainly, would not have sense all ratios deduced further by writers of STR. However in this "simplification" the key error will consist: the important fact of the above mentioned time displacement is skipped. Actually, according to a phenomenon of a relativity of simultaneity, the acceptance report of a signal by interferometer occurs in two systems not simultaneously. Namely: in the system, moving from another in a direction of an axis X, it occurs earlier. That is, when the signal already has reached a ultimate goal in the moving system, it continues still to run cheerfully on a hypotenuse of a rectangular triangle in stationary system. As at the moment of the terminal of experiment on clocks of a moving system at the stationary system this notorious hypotenuse not yet passed, it is no the right for explorers to operate with its size in formulas of the relative conversions. In precisely the same way, all other events in two systems appear displaced (and variously!) in time, so that all comparisons and matching of spatial and time values used by writers of special relativity in this situation are simply improper. What turns out? Formulas of Lorentz’s transformations are deduced contrary to, in damage with own consequence, with a phenomenon of relativity of a simultaneity! Thus, there are full bases to talk about the internal contradiction in special relativity or, as a minimum, about the incorrect "sophistical" trick resulting in reception of Lorentz’s transformations in this variant of "conclusion". Let's dare to state some reasons concerning other versions of conclusion and submission STR. 2). From a phenomenon of a relativity of simultaneity, in particular, follows, that the moment at that an event occurs on a time scale (temporal coordinate) certain in special way depends on a position of a point in space (spatial coordinate), anyway, along a line of relative movement of two systems (routinely last combine with an axis x). Thus, x and t demonstrate a certain mutuality (it follows and from formulas of Lorentz’s transformations) that should stake under doubt possibility of using of them in the capacity of independent orthogonal axes of coordinates in four-dimensional pseudoeuclidean space. Applicability of a Minkowski universe in this case should produce doubts. 3). The fact of the mentioned dependence x and t must obviously to take into account and at an evaluation of possibility of using of a matrix form of record of the conforming vectors: in particular, they cannot be mapped orthogonal matrixes. So that artful simplifications for orthogonal matrixes practiced by writers of STR here do not fit. 4). The same phenomenon of dependence of coordinate on a time scale from coordinate in space does not allow to confine only gyration of a frame of reference at conclusion of conversions in a Minkowski space, here is strictly necessary as well a parallel displacement. Thus, routinely practiced simplification here again is impermissible, it is necessary to consider more a general case.

Abstract In frameworks special relativity phenomenon « relativity of simultaneity » has the third-rate, derivative status. The author, on the contrary, suggests considering it as a main, moreover, a unique phenomenon of the special relativity. Instead of Lorentz's transformations more simple variant of the transformations which have been not concerned with distortions of a spatial and time scale is offered. This variant eliminates paradoxes that irritate sensible people. That fact is underlined, that the suggested methodology strictly corresponds to materialistic outlook, as against plainly positivistic methodology on which till now it is based special relativity. ___________________________________________________________________________ The requirement of the second postulate of Einstein about sameness of speed of light in all inertial reference systems at once tunes up on singularity, means a deviation from canons of classical mechanics and should bring basic distortions in habitual for people of representation about space and time. So it is possible to consider, that the people starting studying special relativity, should be already morally ready to surprising metamorphoses. However one of problems of a science consists in not was overzealous in quantity of these metamorphoses, in scale of novelty added with new theoretical representations. Not a secret that physicists-theorists are at times ready to bring down a huge billow of new absolutely mad hypotheses on heads of other people. The problem of the wide scientific community standing on a healthy world outlook platform consists in whenever possible to limit revolutionary aspirations of some excessively zealous authors, to reduce a degree of novelty and singularity of their concepts to pragmatically justified necessary minimum. In opinion of the author of this article, today not all while is all right in special relativity in this respect. That is authors of special relativity have obviously overdone with scale of novelty, have run counter to the requirement of a principle of savings. It would be necessary to try to find for the given physical situation more simple theoretical explanation, less bulky and less burdensome for human thinking. Historically at first the idea has come to heads of physicists that in conditions of relative movement of inertial systems with near-light speeds transformation of spatial characteristics is inevitable. So formulas of Lorentz's transformations were born. However people have the right to take an interest: why so have together decided to begin with spatial distortions, and, say, not with time? Apparently, so the human mind is arranged: it would be desirable to begin with small, close and clear. Probably, metamorphoses of space are perceived by people easier, than metamorphoses of time. However as a result it has turned out, that one only transformation of space to manage it was not possible, it was necessary to subject to distortions time characteristics too. But else what distortions! According to Lorentz's transformations, in this situation double metamorphoses of time take place: time intervals are reduced, and there is a phenomenon of “relativity of simultaneity”. Thus, the initial "cautious" idea about transformation of space to which physicists have so amicably clung has generated the whole bouquet of shocking effects. We have a right to ask: and what would turn out, if have begun with other end? The author tries to prove below, that another initial installation leads in this situation to result more simple and sparing human thinking with a minimum of novelty and singularity. At a statement of contents of special relativity it is usually accepted to find out a phenomenon « relativity of simultaneity » right at the beginning. But thus detection has for unknown reason only qualitative character, the funny fact of this relativity is established only. The quantitative formula was deduce much later, after calculations of "reductions" of lengths of spatial and time pieces according to Lorentz's transformations. As a result it turns out, that the given phenomenon has in special relativity as though the "third-rate", dependent status. As a rule, after that all at once forget about it. The author sees a basic mistake in this fact. He considers that value of this phenomenon wrongly is underestimated. Actually it is the main thing here (and as it will be shown below – by the only thing). Therefore it should be investigated first of all and more deeply. And the concrete formula describing the given phenomenon, it is possible and it is necessary to deduce at once, it is direct from mental experiment with « Einstein's train »… … A little about the nature of a phenomenon of a relativity of a simultaneity. Actually it is a question of relative displacement (shift) of events on some interval on a time scale at transition from one system to another. The size of this displacement depends on position in space (along an axis of mutual movement of systems). This displacement (we shall name it defect of discrepancy of events in the time) and leads to a phenomenon interesting us, is its quantitative characteristic… … As we see, the result of our observer does not coincide with what ensues from Lorentz's transformations. It looks easier and thus is not concerned with deformation of a spatial and time scale. Who is right? … Let's try to consider captiously this situation, remembering about the fact of a relativity of simultaneity. In system attached to interferometer the ray of light, having run over a shoulder of interferometer and having reflected from a mirror, after a while comes back in an initial point, a point of start. In stationary system concerning which the interferometer it is displaced, this event – returning a light beam – occurs no longer in a point of start, and in other point because during time of travel Δt of this beam the interferometer itself was displaced in space on size l = V t. The important circumstance is found out here. According to a phenomenon of a relativity of simultaneity in this other point the defect of displacement (shift) of events on a time scale takes place. That is the event in this point occurs on clocks of one system earlier, than on clocks another. In particular, when process of movement in one system is already finished, in another it still continues! There is very puzzling methodological problem: as in such conditions to broadcast events from one system in another how to carry out direct comparisons of spatial and time characteristics? There is a suspicion, that physicists till now insufficiently seriously thought over this question. Really: except for one initial moment all events in two moving systems do not synchronize, and the size of defect of discrepancy is not constant, continuously progresses with increase in relative displacement of systems in space. The serious analysis of this problem leads to ascertaining the sad fact: it is impossible to reach a situation when the beginning and the end of any physical process synchronize in both systems. One moment, for example, the beginning or the end of process can coincide only. In the Michelson's experience the beginning coincides only, in the mental experiment with « Einstein's train » the end coincides only…. … Not very comforting conclusion inevitably follows from this situation: if it is impossible to combine in the time the beginning and the end of any process, all its intermediate phases and all local events occurring in its frameworks in two systems moving with near-light speed it is necessary to recognize goal-setting of direct comparison of dynamic, spatial and time characteristics of this process, to put it mildly, very problem. In this connection that charming simplicity which authors special relativity have shown at a derivation of transformations of Lorentz, in any way it is impossible to recognize methodologically correct. Obviously, these transformations should be reconsidered. It is necessary to subject special relativity to serious alteration. What thus will occur to its well-known effects and paradoxes? …What turns out as a result? If to consider a situation methodologically correctly and from the very beginning to take into account the fact of a relativity of a simultaneity it is necessary to speak about impossibility of simultaneous fixing the ends of a rod in two systems at once. In conditions of movement of systems relatively each other this circumstance if to understand, does impossible the act of direct comparison of lengths of the spatial segments located along a line of movement. Similar reasoning lead to a conclusion about impossibility of direct comparison as well time intervals as acts of measurement in conditions of continuous mutual displacement of systems are made besides in the points spased in space along a line of movement. Defect of discrepancy of events in these points does impossible the fact of simultaneous fixing of the beginning and the end of a time interval in two systems. In such conditions it will be most reasonable to consider, that nothing unusual does not occur to a scale of space and a time scale in general. There is only a fact of displacement of events on a time scale. Thus, the basic impossibility of direct comparison of lengths of segments and time intervals forces to change radically the attitude to Lorentz's transformations and the well-known consequences special relativity. Due accentuation of effect of a relativity of a simultaneity leads us to necessity not only to reconsider all former calculations, but also to cancel all other "relativistic" effects. All these imaginary "reductions", paradox of "twins" and some other amusing things is necessary, as is sad, to throw out in a basket of history. In case of with "twins" all is simply: at their high-speed removal from each other, under the version of everyone, another is displaced on a time scale. However at returning the sign on speed varies on opposite and displacement occurs in the opposite direction so as a result it will be not revealed any difference in the age at the meeting. So, the special theory of relativity gets now a kind of the theory only one phenomenon – spatially caused displacement of events on a time scale… In detail it is possible to familiarize at the article to the address of here