Jump to content

Misodoctakleidi

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    34
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About Misodoctakleidi

  • Rank
    Quark
  • Birthday 05/11/1986

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Location
    United Kingdom
  1. Another option would be to give Chechnya independance.
  2. I don't know where you get that impression from but take the word of someone who has read alot more Marx than you, you're wrong. I don't think you know what his "philosophy" was, do you? His philosophy was Dialectical Materialism so I don't know how you could describe it as "working" or "not working." Which is only true of the last 400 years or so. No, in the first societies property was communaly owned. You seem to have introduced a new "concept" here which wasn't in your definition, this wishy-washy "working for themselves" rhetoric. well aren't you quite the philosopher, I think you'll find that socio-economic systems a little more complex than that. You didn't though.
  3. I completely diagree, I've just done A levels in Maths, Physics and Sociology and some of the exams were much harder than papers from 4 or 5 years ago.
  4. Misodoctakleidi

    China

    China isn't socialist at all, it makes the USA look like a workers paradise! It is more authoritarian than ever though.
  5. Wanting the liberation of opressed people makes him a loser? No, he wasn't. No, he wasn't. I preume, then, you can explain why capitalism has only existed for around the last 400 years or so. Why did that spring to mind when "speaking of communism?"
  6. Yes but just becuase it could have been terrorism doesn't mean it was, unless we know of other goals whoch would conform to the definition of terrorism then we should presume that it wasn't.
  7. Are you now suggesting that killing "infidels" wasn't the goal?
  8. But the terror it insighted didn't achieve the goal of killing "infidels," it was the act it's self, the terror was merely a side effect.
  9. Or so we presume. If that was there goal then it still wouldn't constitute an act of terrorism, it was the act it's self which killed the "infidels" not the use of violence to insight terror.
  10. I agree with the definitions but I'd hardly say it was the same thing. It's possible to kill great numbers of people with no ideological goal in mind, it's also possible to insight terror for political ends without killing anyone.
  11. I'm saying that that the 9/11 attack wasn't terrorism, it was just mass murder.
  12. So you propose collective punishment? Perhaps all christians should be killed for the crusades or the inquisitions or the witchhunts?
  13. 9/11 wasn't a terrorist attack.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.