Pratt

Actually 5 superstring theories combined to form a so called M theory.Now this also includes the 11-dimensional supergravity!The question is why gravity is so weak than the oder fundamental forces of nature.So scientists investigated it very deeply and rather found that gravity is not at all weak,but it APPEARS WEAK!!Now suppose theres a source of sound and d sound waves are coming out of it.A person is listening to that, sitting at a certain distance from it.He cant hear the sound xactly wid d maximum amplitude jus coz the sound waves spreads themselves in 3-dimensions in our view!Likewise, investigating mathematically,scientists found that the force of gravity spreads itself out into 11 such dimensions,out of which 10 are spatial dimensions,the oder being time!Now we can nly see the usual 3ds..and not more dan dat,coz anything which is in a smaller dimension,cant visualize d higher ones(none can put a 3d box inside a 2d sheet)!!So here comes the introduction of 11 dimensions!Actually if we view gravity in such 11 dimenions(jus for sake of imagination), den gravity wouldnt have been interpreted as weak.....!!...

Actually what I mean to ask is, how come we hold a orthodox viewpoint of ''charge'' of a particle??What does the ''charge'' actually mean??What kind of property is it associated with??

What is actually meant by the ''charge'' of a particle??Why we interpret it by ''positive'' and ''negative''?In 2-d vector view,it can be meant as direction,but if we consider a multidimensional view, then is there any existance of other kind of charges??

I m posting one of my thought experiment here,which is as follows.Please have a look through it and give suggestions or make out errors if dere is.......(some confusion is dere wid the moment of inertia of a disc(a coin in dis case).If its given wrong,please correct it...... COLLAPSING OF PROBABILITY INTO CERTAINTY IN CLASSICAL MACRO-SYSTEMS:- Thought experiment:-'Tossing of a coin' :----- When we toss a coin, we force it up and it performs both rotational motion and translation motion. In our views, we find out the probability of whether a head will come up or a tail. But, if we carefully investigate the motions under certain given parameters, it may be possible to predict with certainty, whether the coin will come up with a head or a tail! Our aim is to relate this event mathematically to 'collapse down' the probability into certainty . Let the mass of the coin be 'm' and radius be 'r'. Let we apply a force 'F'. Let the force required to rotate the coin by 180 degree(pi radians) be 'f'.['f' is an arbitrary constant dependent upon the properties of the coin] The moment of inertia of the coin(a circular disc) I =1/2*m*r^2. The coin goes to a height 'h' vertically due to Fsinz . It rotates due to Fcosz. So total distance traversed(d)=2h. If it makes 'n' rotations, then 2*pi*r*n = 2h =>n= h/r*pi. Let the coin is tossed up with an initial angle 'z'. Now, Fsinz= mg Let angular acceleration be 'a'.So, Fcosz =I*a=I*r*g [ g is acceleration due to gravity]. Solving these two equations, F= g*sq.root(m^2+I^2*r^2) Now, from initial position, total angular change =n*pi So, for n*pi angular change, required force =nf = Fcosz=g*sq.root(m^2+I^2*r^)*cosz . So, n = Fcos /f = {g*sq.root(m^2+I^2*r^2)*cosz}/ f. Now, if n = 2m+1 , for all mE Z+, then certainly n is odd, and the coin will come up with the opposite face of that of the initial(If initially before tossing, coin is having head, it will come up with tail and vice-versa). If n= 2m,for all mE Z+ , the certainly n is even and the coin will come up with the same face of that of the initial(if initially coin is with head, it will come up with head after tossing). If n= K.x (where k= 2m or 2m+1,for all mE Z+), then if x<5 or x=5, then n= K. Else if x > 5, then n= k+1. Hence, we can determine whether the coin will come up with head or tail with a strong probability of 1!! This implies, we can predict the toss certainly under careful mathematical investigation, with the said parameters and equations!

Is consciousness of our mind a result of wave funtion collapse,due to minute spacetime curvature caused by the sub-atomic particles or its embedded in the photon itself??Plz share some ideas about this topic.