Victor Elias Espinoza G.

Okay, let me ask you (again) my previous question, only try to make it clearer:

 

If we assume:

• Light has mass and weight.
• The *color* of light is affecting its weight.
• The color of objects is produced by the light when part of it is absorbed in the object and part of it is reflected. The part that is reflected gets into our eyes, and we see a certain color.
• When light is absorbed in an object, it should add to its weight, because the color of the light has weight.

It occurs to me, then, that the test should be simple.

 

Put a blue cup, red cup, black cup and white cup on an accurate electronic scale (which on its own). Measure their weights.

 

Turn off all sources of light in the room. There is no light to be absorbed now, and no color in either. Measure the weights again in complete darkness.

 

If your theory is correct, the cups should weigh less. The black cup should have the biggest difference, since black absorbs all light (red/blue/etc included) - so when there WAS a source of light, the black cup should have "gained" weight.

 

Red should, according to you, have a larger difference than the blue one, and white should, for the most part, remain more or less the same.

 

Is this experiment working for you to test this part f your theory, Victor? If it is, it seems to me to be quite simple. We should have results quickly and see if your theory is right.

 

~mooey

The color of the light is only attracted by gravity not the matter.

I happen to have a yellow bulb here. And I have a white one too. I also have my cellphone.

I put my cellphone for quite a while under the bulbs (separately, it's now under the yellow one, for 10 minutes already).

I don't see several mobile phones.

I see one phone.

 

I turned off the light, and I still see one phone. I have a dark room here, so I walked into it, just out of curiosity. I turned the screen off -- nothing. I turned it on -- one phone, glowing.

 

I moved it around, I tilted it, I don't see what you're claiming.

 

Also, my phone isn't heavier even though it just absorbed (and reflected) quite a lot of light. It *is* hotter. It's not heavier.

 

Explain.

 

 

You can call it whatever you want, but this phenomena simply doesn't exist. What you write happens does NOT happen. What you claim is simply bunk.

 

No matter what you call it.

 

~mooey

 

 

You must move sharply the cell to the right and left you can see several mobile phones.

I gave you an experiment to do, you quoted me on it. It's up to *YOU* to prove your own theory. However, seeing as the weight of objects does not change in relation to how much light is in the room, I'd say you are in need of explanation.

 

Also, do answer my question about the magnetism. You claimed light was attracted -- by what means? Magnetism?

 

~mooey

"The Veegtrón magnetic color"...

Put you under a yellow or white bulb and suddenly moves a cell phone with the screen turned on and you'll see several mobile phones.

Put you under a red or blue bulb suddenly moves a cell phone with the screen turned on and you'll see several mobile phones.

Put you under a bulb off and suddenly moves a cell phone with the screen turned on and you'll see several mobile phones.

I called this phenomenon the universe magnetized color.

What color is that? Gamma?

I don't know much about gamma rays, but from what I've seen on the internet have many colors. It is possible to be a transparent color and if you put a red lens change to red.

I'm not sure of this response, but if you can help me understand the gamma rays, I thank you.

Tell me that you know about gamma rays to check with my theory of the weight of the light.

Attracts?? So.. it's magnetic now?!

 

I don't understand, Victor. You either follow up on your claims to the physical conclusion whatever it may be, or you stomp your feet in the ground despite reality, inventing your own terminology.

 

 

You just said it's not about intensity (in the posts above) but rather the COLOR. I designed an experiment that has to do with the colors alone.

 

Your counter argument makes no sense.

 

 

Wordsalad. You're either speaking physics, or you're not. That's not physics.

 

I don't understand what it is you're saying.

 

 

 

 

 

Victor,

 

"If I told you "everything moves the oobapalooba. It shifts and vibrates like a fish floating on the splash of water. Then it moves the surrounding and increases the flaflas."

 

 

Would you accept my words as physics? I would hope not. First problem is that my terminology makes no sense because it's not defined. What is "oobapalooba", and wtf is 'flaflas'. Nothing unless I define them properly. Second, the sentence in general makes no sense, but the most important issue is taht even if all MADE sense, I have no evidence of anything.

 

That sentence is exactly like the one you're saying, only replace "oobapalooba" with "veegtron", fish with 'light colors' and water with mass.

 

You're not in a babble-forum, you're in a science forum. You're not even answering our questions properly, let alone supplying evidence.

 

My experiment shows your theory is wrong. You need to supply evidence. The burden of proof is on you. Take it already.

 

~mooey

What experiment you did?

Which ones weigh more, gamma rays or radio waves?

The gamma ray because it has color.

Okay, let me ask you (again) my previous question, only try to make it clearer:

 

If we assume:

• Light has mass and weight.
• The *color* of light is affecting its weight.
• The color of objects is produced by the light when part of it is absorbed in the object and part of it is reflected. The part that is reflected gets into our eyes, and we see a certain color.
• When light is absorbed in an object, it should add to its weight, because the color of the light has weight.

It occurs to me, then, that the test should be simple.

 

Put a blue cup, red cup, black cup and white cup on an accurate electronic scale (which on its own). Measure their weights.

 

Turn off all sources of light in the room. There is no light to be absorbed now, and no color in either. Measure the weights again in complete darkness.

 

If your theory is correct, the cups should weigh less. The black cup should have the biggest difference, since black absorbs all light (red/blue/etc included) - so when there WAS a source of light, the black cup should have "gained" weight.

 

Red should, according to you, have a larger difference than the blue one, and white should, for the most part, remain more or less the same.

 

Is this experiment working for you to test this part f your theory, Victor? If it is, it seems to me to be quite simple. We should have results quickly and see if your theory is right.

 

~mooey

The light it attracts the color of the cups, but the drinks they will not attract the color of the light.

Could you please just answer my questions directly? Your website is very difficult to understand.

The weight is due to the amount of colors, 5 litres of water is stronger than 1 liter of water.

The distance of a vibration is infinite, until no longer vibrate the particle that moves the waves of mobile phones.

I have done me this question, so try to answer it by creating a new theory called "Theory of the Veegtrón".

Everything moves the "Veegtrón", for example: a magnet attracts iron without touching it, that's called magic, the Veegtrón is what is between the magnet and iron, and removes the magic of the magnet. It tries to explain the theory of the veegtrón.

Which ones weigh more, gamma rays or radio waves? And what does their weight mean for how far they can travel?

Everything is due to the "Veegtrón" read it at http://www.theory-espinoza.es.tl

The weight is a sum of colors and they can travel to the "Veegtrón" let vibrate.

Assuming this trend is supposed to work past the visible spectrum, i.e. infrared "weighs" even more, this is backwards even using relativistic mass, which I think has been pointed out. This has been experimentally verified in a version of moo's experiment: an atom absorbing light increases in mass. The increase depends on the frequency of light according to E=hv, and not inversely as Victor is proposing.

 

It's falsified any way you want to slice it.

It illuminates the clouds with infrared light, but weighs, why gravity it attracts.

So the colours in the picture... You seem to be saying they reach their limit, cannot go higher due to weight, but then where do they go?

 

A ball thrown in the same direction would be affected by gravity and curve back to the ground. Your colours just seem to disappear. What hypothetical rules are your colours demonstrating?

The colors of an image does not move because it does not shine.

All matter has colors and therefore weight.

And what about things like infrared light, gamma rays, and radio waves?

Different vibration explain that they have a different weight.

So...you think the light is attracted by gravity in such a way that even though it is not heading straight up, it turns around and goes back in the direction it came?

The color of the light is what weighs not the brightness of the light.

The question continued in "redshift"

So...you think the light is attracted by gravity in such a way that even though it is not heading straight up, it turns around and goes back in the direction it came?

The color of the light is what weighs not the brightness of the light.

Why light produces waves, because it weighs. Let us remember that a wave produces a touch.

The light has weight....

According to my research, the colors of a reflector of high power do not reach the clouds, this is because the color is attracted by gravity.

Very affectionate

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

July 28, 2011

I have a question....

There is a reflactor of high power illuminating the clouds with a color other than white?

If there is not a reflactor, who carried all the colours the clouds, it is because the color weighs.

And is thus demonstrated that light has weight......

The gavedad it will not fail the light of another color climb to the clouds.

With what type of equipment?

 

I can't wait for you to come back to us with the full experimental design, the controls, and the result. Revolutionize physics.

 

~mooey

As was mentioned before,your site doesn't have a single proper piece of evidence. It only offers a lecture-type series of images that provide no explanation as to the current phenomena we know explained by current theories, or your evidence for ANY of your claims.

 

We're not here to promote your site. We are here to discuss scientific data and scientific theory. Can you provide ANY sort of evidence at ALL ?

I have come to the conclusion that the vacuum does not exist, but that the universe consists of a particle that moves the waves of a Galaxy to another and have called you Veegtrón. www.theory-Espinoza.es.tl

Or http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/58697-the-mysterious-veegtron/

Nothing can not be composed of nothing!

You are trying to say that the light has no waves!

I I mean blow when we hit a wood and then runs a frequency for the wood. The same happens with the light, the light hits the universe and produces frequencies that are muven throughout the universe.

Many experiments say that light has waves, but no one had asked why is the light produces waves. I say that it is by weight.

You and what you say so that light can produce waves? We add new ideas to the experiments on the light.

That frequencies are only caused by blows. In this case the light hits and produces different frequencies. Only the weight can cause a stroke.

Light produces frequencies and is the only way to produce frequencies with weight.

Light vibrate particles that produce waves of radio, television, mobile phones and others. Each color a different vibration.

It is true, is incredible to think that sunlight has weight. (that is my explanation to each color of light has a different wavelength). What I've been thinking and I find no other explanation. A wave is created by weight.

The redshift

This occurs because the color red weighs more than other colors. For each light produces a different wavelength, it is because each light has a different weight and Red is greater.

According to my theory (http://www.theory-espinoza.es.tl):

A wave is a vibration of the Veegtrón and the colors are different waves because they have different weights. Let us remember that the waves produces a coup.

The Veegtrón of the red light is attracted by the Veegtrón of blue light, but as the red light weighs more, the movement happens towards the red.

Very affectionate

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

July 25, 2011

The mysterious Veegtrón!

Read Wikipedia: do not know what causes the photon. I have discovered, that makes it, the same particle moving waves of mobile phones, television, radio and others.

How it works the Veegtrón: when it vibrates to create waves, when it shines is to create the light when heated by the Sun is to create heat, when cooled in the darkness is to create the cold when it changes color it is to change the color of the light and is a magnet for colors because he magnetized the color of an object when you move sharply.

The Veegtrón also does the following moves the magnetism of the Sun to keep the planets in orbit, move the magnetism of the magnet to attract the iron a little retired, move the magnetism of the planets to attract the moons and move the magnetism of atoms to create strong and weak force, nothing moves only attract an object without touching it is magic and magic does not exist. But with the Veegtrón remove the magic to be the Veegtrón between objects and the universe to be the Veegtrón between the planets and galaxies.

The Veegtrón also takes away the weight to the planets by immersing them in a Lake of Veegtrones. The universe is fact transparent Veegtrones us confused and makes us believe that there is a vacuum, but nothing can not be made of nothing but Veegtrones moving waves.

An example of the Veegtrón in operation: when the Veegtrones are light, they also produce waves, this is due to that when the Veegtrón shines, it vibrates also together. This is an example that explains the phenomenon of light waves.

In conclusion: the Veegtrón "Vibrates", "Shine", "Heated", "Cool", "Change color", "Carries the magnetism" and "Acts as a Lake of planets". Their existence explains some phenomena of nature.

Very affectionate

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

June 10, 2011

Read Wikipedia: do not know what causes the photon. I have discovered, that makes it, the same particle that moves a wave of mobile phones.

The Veegtrón moves when he is a radio wave. And the Veegtrón shines when it is a wave of short microscopic circuit.

The Veegtrón is that produces the photon when it shines. And the Veegtrón produces radio waves moving.

Very affectionate

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

June 10, 2011

Many times I wondered how enlightens the photon and the response I got changed photon by an Veegtrón with electric charge positive and negative.

The reason I gave him an electric charge to the Veegtrón is to verify the theory of lighting by a microscopic short-circuit this particle Veegtrón.

With this particle since discovered, explains why shines the wave out of the lightbulb or a candle is easy, what happens is the wave consists of Veegtrones in microscopic circuit shining and illuminating what we see.

To explain the movement of a Galaxy light to another, I had to say the universe consists entirely of Veegtrones in positive and negative with a mass because it makes floating planets.

If the Veegtrón has mass and energy it is likely that there comes the creation of the atom and its positive and negative electricity. It is also likely that electricity 110 and 220 volts and more are Veegtrones, there is no other place where come there on our planet but the same universe and the universe is a composition of Veegtrones in positive and negative. In conclusion when the Veegtrón brings together becomes atom and electricity.

To explain the phenomenon of light and shadow I had to use the Veegtrón. Veegtrón when in short circuit is light and when it is not short circuit the shadow.

It is hard to believe that this is the composition of the empty particle, but there is another answer: nothing can not be made of anything, the empty must have a composition and in this case I've filled the vacuum Veegtrones, who is to blame move one side of the universe waves across the universe by matter and light touch by touch of energy.

In short, the Veegtrón is producing the photon with his electric spark.