Victor Elias Espinoza G.

The light has weight....

According to my research, the colors of a reflector of high power do not reach the clouds, this is because the color is attracted by gravity.

If the light it has waves is because it has weight. A wave is produced by touch.

If each color produces a different wavelength, it is because they have a different weight.

The light has weight....

Very affectionate,

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

July 20, 2011

www.teoria-espinoza.es.tl

www.theory-espinoza.es.tl

Please, you can open the topicthat is closed and has no discussion. The topic is called "Unification of the 4 fundamental forces nature".

I beg you to open the item. Thank you very much for meeting me.

Very affectionate,

Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez

What is this something? And what atoms? Do you mean that the light DUPLICATED? What caused it to duplicate? Atoms just "popped up" out of nothing?

 

You can insist until you're blue, Victor, but you're making no sense.

I can also insist that gibberish is english. Insisting won't help me make it so.

The slit is made of atoms and if there is room for where it passes the light, then this space is composed of Vectrones. They stretch the colors of light. They are just in the slit.

I think he means that since the two stretches of light seem to be smearing towards the center light, the APPEAR to be "attracted to it".

 

This might have had some.. imaginary.. basis.. if only the two "smears" weren't the product of the center light source.

 

Victor, there is only *ONE* light source in this picture. ONE lightbulb, in the center. The two side "smears" are the effect of the diffraction grating.

 

Did you even BOTHER watching the video I posted, or reading anything we posted?

 

 

If you don't want to know what reality is about, you can just stomp your feet in the ground 'till you're blue (and lighter?) and it still would make as much sense as incoherent babble.

 

You are either here to discuss science, or you're here to insist your version of reality is wrong DESPITE reality.

 

Do choose.

 

~mooey

I stand by what I say, there is something that stretches the colors of light they are atoms or they are Veegtrones.

These are three EQUAL sources of light. And yet, we see different types of "color" smear on all three.

 

EXPLAIN THE PICTURE:

 

 

I have analyzed the image and I got to the following conclusion:

Duplication is due to the magnetism of color by:

1.- Atoms

2.- Veegtrones (particles that move the cell phone waves)

In the rectangles we see that the colors were magnetizados and stretched.

See image below:

We're not talking about mirrors, Victor. There are no mirrors in this picture. You need to answer the question.

What there are in the image please and what it means to m.

Victor, you are missing the point.

First, this experiment does not use a prism. It uses a diffraction grating- that's just dark parallel lines ruled very close together on a clear piece of glass. (you can make on from scratches on a bit of metal and the effect that you see with light reflected from a CD is also the same sort of thing).

The central image in the picture is just a view of the lamp (It has nothing to do with any candles, so please don't waste time talking about candles. I assure you it works just fine with a candle as the light source).

 

There are two spread out images of the lamp labelled as m=+1 and m=-1

 

If the picture had been taken slightly differently, there would be another pair of "rainbow" pictures of the lamp, even further out. (There might be others too, even further out)

 

Please explain these four images (as I asked before).

I'd like to know why they are spread out into spectra, why there are 4 of them and why they are where they are?

The reason I ask is that I can explain it perfectly well using conventional physics.

If your ideas don't explain it then your "theory" simply isn't as good as the conventional one.

With what little I understood the question and the data that give me the image, I came to this conclusion.

A mirror tells you the truth of the colors.

For example the white light, a Prism tells you that it is not white.

The same applies to the image: thou sees the origin of white light, but the mirror tells you that it is not white.

Trivially shown to be false. Incandescent bulbs give a blackbody spectrum.

Yes I was wrong, the light from the bulb has colours or they are the colors of the Prism.

These are three EQUAL sources of light. And yet, we see different types of "color" smear on all three.

 

EXPLAIN THE PICTURE:

 

 

I think 3 sources of light are a candle fire.

I've been studying what is fire and came to the conclusion that the fire is a microscopic short-circuit of the energy released by the atoms to the burn.

It is likely that each candle has different colors, everything depends on the color released by the atoms to the burn.

A bulb does not release colors as. a candle. because a bulb is not burning atoms.

This question:

 

 

 

I will wait with mine (still awaiting an answer) 'till AFTER you answer this one.

 

~mooey

Find it me interesting your question and the image, but I do not understand your question. I can improve the question to see if I can find an answer.

Speaking of science Victor, could you answer the question I asked please?

What is the question?

.... yeah, no, see, that would be taking my "welcome" too far.

 

How 'bout we stick to the science.

Okey

AS IT ATTRACTS THE VEEGTRÓN THE ENERGY THE IMAM, SUN, PLANETS AND ATOM

It is easy, the Veegtrón is between the iron and magnet, so it touches the iron and magnet, when the Veegtrón touch the Imam begins the stretching of the energy which is inside the magnet, because then the second Veegtrón will attract the energy of the first Veegtrón, then the third Veegtrón will attract the energy of the second Veegtrón and so on until you reach the iron.

When it reaches the iron, the Veegtrón loose energy stretched as a League or rubber and produces the movement of iron touched by the energy to return to the magnet.

The Veegtrón not only moves the waves but also moves the energy and creates a magnetic field.

Energy is a League or rubber that can be stretched to a certain distance forming a field around the matter.

To understand how the Veegtrón it extends the energy atom we know that the Veegtrón is around the atom moving waves of mobile phones.

To be around the atom, the Veegtrón is up to the atom and the energy of the atom is placed into the Veegtrón that is coming to the atom. In this case, the second Veegtrón which is about the first Veegtrón also will be filled with energy, this will happen until the Veegtrón can not already more stretch the electrical charge of the atom and will release the rubber energy separated from the atom.

When loose the rubber of energy inside the atom, it move the atom that is touching the rubber of atom, producing a rapprochement of the atom that surrounds it.

Not only Veegtrón magnetized color but also energy.

This is the process of magnetism, it is not magic Magnet attracts iron, just as happens with the atom, the Sun and the planets.

Exercise:

The new equivalencies would be:

Attraction force = mass size * Veegtrón force

NEWTON = CENTIMETERS * VEEGTRONES

FA4 = TM * FV

FA4 = 200 cm ^ 2 * 2 veegtrones

FA4 = 400 Veegtrones/cm ^ 2

For electricity would be:

Force of attraction = electricity * Veegtrón force

FA4 = (EL * FV) ^ 3

FA4 = (12 volts * 2 veegtrones) ^ 3

FA4 = (24 veegtrones/volts) ^ 3

A4 = 13824 veegtrones /voltios

Okay, I asked this to see if you had any classes about the basics of optics? Did you learn about radio waves and the electromagnetic spectrum? "Colors" is something that is produced in our brain as a response to specific part of the EM spectrum. There's no color "beyond" that range, but the waves are still the same EM waves.

 

 

 

Ah, hola! I'm in New York currently. Welcome to the forum.

 

 

~mooey

You have picture, to see if you are pretty...I have a facebook and is "Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez", but I can also find my email ***EMAIL REMOVED BY MODERATOR*** en facebook.

That image is merely a record of the tracks of various particles. It is not a picture of those particles; it's like a map or a diagram of a battlefield, showing where the troops moved. One could draw it with purple lines, or green dashed lines with shading, or anything else -- it's a representation of information, not a picture of atoms.

According to the website where it appears is a colición of atoms...See the following link:

http://en.Wikipedia....i/Spark_chamber

Black and white aren't colors. Black is no-clor and white is all-colors.

 

And regardless, the picture isn't showing the colors of the beams, it's showing the PATH. It's a generated photo.

 

 

 

Victor, I'm curious, and I mean no disrespect, but can you tell me what level of physics classes did you take so far in school? What grade are you in right now? This will help getting you some more information. Also, I think there might be a small language barrier here.. out of curiosity, where are you from?

 

 

If we put a Prism in the following image obtained by a Collider of atoms, we will obtain colors....

I'm T.S.U. in computer science I saw physical 1,2 and 3 (Basic) but I've learned the most reading in Internet.

I currently have a parking for cars and I same I am the watchman. As security guard work in my own parking.

I'm from Valencia, Venezuela.

And you?

The picture in there has no color.. It's just white lines, and if you read the descriptions, you can see it has nothing to do with color.

 

You may think so, but that's wrong. As many scientists in this forum tell you, there's no color in the detectors' data. The data is way above or below the visible spectrum. "Colors" are strictly defined IN the visible spectrum, so the data doesn't have color at ALL.

 

The fact there are drawings produced according to the data and are dyed to make things easier to read does not mean there's color in the original data.

 

~mooey

If there are 2 colors: black and white, remember that there is a black and white pencil.

Where have you read this? Can you give us the link?

An image of collision of atoms made with spark chambers:

For example:

http://en.Wikipedia....i/Spark_chamber

They don't see anything. They use machines and equipment to translate the data. Later they use a computer to *draw* what the numbers say.

 

There's no color in the actual results.

I was reading the page of detectors that use the particle colliders and data collection said that there were photons in collisions of atoms and why they paint them for us.

I think the data detector tells scientists the color of the photon.

They don't see anything. They use machines and equipment to translate the data. Later they use a computer to *draw* what the numbers say.

 

There's no color in the actual results.

I've read they have seen photons and this they have done with cameras that you capture 40 million pictures per second.

No, color is limited to the visible spectrum. Light outside of that range does not have a color. Other subatomic particles do not have a color.

Then they see when colliding atoms in a particle accelerator. A black screen without colors!

Any photograph you see of a collision of atoms is colored by the physicists after the fact, so it makes sense to a viewer. You can't detect individual subatomic particles in a collision with visible light -- it's physically impossible.

But what they see before coloring her must have color, maybe gray color.

Why? Color is already explained by showing how atoms reflect light of different wavelengths differently.

 

 

I thought people had tried this, in particle accelerators, and found matter.

Photos of collisions of atoms I've seen have colors

All matter has color and therefore weighs.

Why?

For example: when we will our room of sleep, first thing we do in turn on the light and what we see: 1) television, bed, closet and air conditioner. Also see: 2) atoms. And in addition to atoms what we see: 3) colors.

This means that the atoms are made of colors. If we divide an atoms in 1,000,000,000 bits of what we see: 4) matter or colors.

I think that now we will not see matters but colors.

Wordsalad again. This isn't how light behaves, unless you have any other EVIDENCE to show us.

 

 

You contradict yourself, and you don't know how light works. WHITE light hits objects, some of it is absorbed, and the part that bounces OUT is what we see as color. That's why BLACK objects (absorbing all the light) are black. Red objects absorb most of the light and reflect *off* the red color. Blue absorb most other than blue.

 

Learn some physics, please.

 

 

You're making no sense. An atom has no color. Do you know what color is? How 'bout you learn about it before you decide you know best?

 

Even if yuo want to have "artificial color" which is, say, some colorful substance, it will be a molecule (that, again, absorbs certain colors and reflects others). It won't be a single atom. Go learn physics.

 

 

 

In short, I think it's safe to say that what you DID manage to prove so far is that you don't know what you're own theory says, you cannot answer our questions, you don't care to test, and your theory is untestable.

 

Good luck with that.

 

~mooey

 

 

 

And you still owe me an answer. I don't see your "multiple phones" experiment. Nor do any of my coworkers.

Right, but we know light is also absorbed. That's HOW you get color. And if lightis absorbed and has mass, the it will increase the mass of the object.

 

But this can also be measured differently: If I have an electronic weight, it should show an increase in weight (without ANYTHING on it) when I shine a light on it, and an even bigger increase in weight when I shine red light on it.

 

Is this a right assumption, or is this again not something that will work?

 

Also, you owe us an answer on my previous post.

Using electronic weighing it won't work, each color of light will pass through the atoms and the color to touch the weight then you will no longer touch it because it bounce and the weight of the first color will be lost and so on.

Why can not weigh the color of the light, because the colors bounce taking the weight and we will never have a cumulative weight of colors of light.

We must weigh a dot of color on an atom to know how much weight the color.