alpha2cen

Im still confused as to why the rate isnt constant. Can someone explain this in simple terms please.

Water pressure

P=(density). g h

But, air is compressible fluid.

Air density is not constant. It is a function of pressure, P.

And, other factors, i.e., temperature, humidity, etc. give an influence on pressure. They can vary with altitude.

Without an existance of the background back side something, transforming from energy to particle can happen? At the BigBang point, the high energy seperate away the background back side particles too far. But, current low collision energy does not have a capacity to push away the background back side particles so far. So, antimatters are background back side particles which exist not so far away ?

For safety

Is this calculation wrong?

F_B =~ 5 x total load + platform weight + two pontoons weight

F_B =~ 4 x total load +700+ two pontoons weight

Other factors, i.e., humidity, temperature variation according to altitude are not considered.

This is a calculated result by using this equation.

P₂ =P₁exp(-C(Z₂ -Z₁))

T=25^oC

The elevation at 0 meters has an air pressure of 1000mb,

3000 meters has an air pressure of 700mb,

6000 meters has 500mb.

9000 meters has an air pressure of 330mb.

 

Why is the rate of decrease of air pressure not constant with increasing altitude?

 

On the ground, Z=0

[latex]\Delta P=-\rho \ g \ \Delta Z[/latex]

From the ideal gas equation.

[latex]\rho =\frac{PM}{RT}=K \ P[/latex]

If T is constant, K=constant

[latex]\Delta P=-C \ P \ \Delta Z[/latex]

C; constant

[latex]\Delta Z \rightarrow 0[/latex]

[latex]d P=-C \ P \ d Z[/latex]

Pressure equation

Let [latex]Z_{1}=P_{1}, \ Z_{2}=P_{2}[/latex]

[latex]\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}=exp (-C \ (Z_{2}-Z_{1}))[/latex]

[latex] C =\frac{gM}{RT}[/latex]

Also, it's important to note that one generally obtains the correct equation (both dimensionally sound and physically correct) through means of experimentation (i.e. empirically) not simply by using mathematics - of course, the theoretical derivations can help you to achieve the correct equation for some quantity, however at some point you are going to have to do an experiment(s) in order to obtain a meaningful result which is physically correct.

 

This goes for differential equations too, as you may be able to find the general solution of a differential equation through mathematics - however to obtain the complete solution you will need boundary/initial conditions which are obtained through experiment.

In the case of solving mathematical equations, using dimensionless forms of the equations is more reliable.

Paper chromatography.

Carrier liquid is water, water+ethanol or water +methanol, etc..

This is a Figure about the Coriolis phenomena.

 

 

 

If you are saying that a stronger spring is needed at top because this is the main compressor and a better seal is needed to prevent leakage back through the valve. That would make more sense.

In general, the piston type compressor is used at the high pressure compression. We can control the compression ratio by reducing the empty space. However, without good sealing, the compressor can not generate high pressure gas output.

This Figure represents the intensity of Coriolis effect with latitude.

This is the experiment method.

I agree with you but the problem is the net angular momentum of the water from the Coriolis effect in the sink is less than

than the net angular momentum of the water leaving a small circular drain in the center of the sink which can easily

be confirmed from a simple visual inspection. I think this should be more thoroughly investigated by the scientific

community to find out whats going on.

This is a Figure about the coriolis effect.

The first Figure is about the height effect, and then, the second Figure is about the latitude effect.

Okay so I believe this is a fairly straight forward enthalpy problem, but for what ever reason it says i'm wrong.

 

Did I miss something completely or is there an error in my conversions?

Before doing this experiment, have you done any experiment about the reference reagents by using the same apparatus?

Quantitative experiment always should be exact, even the experiment is in the elementary course.

"Nobody said it was a two stage pump."

 

OK, my mistake. I thought that was what you were implying. Because the valve on the lower left of the bottom part of the cylinder is also a (fresh air) inlet valve.

 

"It may look that way to you, but it doesn't to me."

The main compression is occuring at the upper part of the machine. Botton part sealing state is not so good.

To maintain a good sealing state , suitable spring pressure is required.

Sealing is one of the important factor in the compressor design.

The experiment was carried out at the room temperature?

Is this essential amino acid the vestige of metabolic evolution in human as a result of environmental change and human adaptation?

From the knowledge of the essential amino acid, can we learn what our ancestors ate at that era ?

How about thinking about these conditions again?

1) Iron particle size. The particle size is too large?

2) Charcoal property.

Charcoal is an important material for the oxygen supplier. To occur that oxidation reaction, sufficient oxygen must be supplied to the iron surface.

And, always watch out, dust explosion!!!

The exotic electrons, which are projected onto the front time as positrons, are really in the other parallel world?

http://phys.org/news/2012-06-neutrons-parallel-world.html

In conclusion the reason is the expansion of the universe right?

Using modified Beer Lambert Law, I tested the Steady State Universe theory.

But I could not fit the obtained redshift data to that model anyway.

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/71791-light-interaction;-calculated-results-about-the-steady-state-universe/#entry720407

The blue line is a redshift data line, and the red line is a model data line.

This is a more modified figure in the #32.

If the calculated result has a physical meaning, which one is more correct?

Which one is more correct between these two cases?

Does the "backward" mean a back ground time?

From protozoa to human beings, all living organisms use twenty amino acids? And, used amino acid distribution is similar?

In the case of incompressible fluid and the same height.

[latex]\frac{\Delta P}{\rho } +\frac{\alpha \Delta v^{2}}{2} + f=0[/latex]

When there is no fraction loss, the fluid velocity difference between two points appeares to their pressure difference.

And, pressure difference also appeares to their velocity difference.

Making a command codon is not difficult. We can make a special command codon by using dual codon. For example, we can set "AAAAAAAAAAAAAA" as a start command codon. Evolution and protein structure might have been more dominant for going to the way?