Mg2+V^h2o

Classic case of the equations not meeting the users expectation. I am in the process of redefining some core parameters and will post a segmented equation with details in a while. I don’t want to give too much away in my initial findings, but the nitride particles would be focused within the vortex and then directed by the laser into a small beam. Optoelectronics is not my field, but this idea has been irritating me for a while. Mg would be a type of nano catalyst if I could get it to add more O2 molecules.

If one considers time inevitably linked to change as measurement parameter, let’s add absolute zero into the equation and theory. This would give us no movement and yet we would still have time! Hmmm.

Are you referring to Mg2 as the problem? My theory is that the nitride particles can be excited enough to accelerate. My real problem is the effect of the vacuum on the nitride particles and there response to being in a vacuum. I was also working out what magnetic field I could place around the vortex to stabilize their acceleration in a direction with the laser. I may be way off here.

I am working on a theory to use magnesium in a vacuum to increase the particle speed of a pulse laser. My equation does not confirm that a vortex is stable in a vacuum. My thoughts are that the laser will collectively stabilize the loose partials to focus them at the pinical of the vortex. Has anyone done any work with this. This is just theory at present and I am trying to prove the equation before I set up the lab test. Here is where I am at (w_b>>w_r)+Mg2=YBa2Cu3O7-δ