And what do you suspect they said, because according to the Secretary and several other retired and active brass, these broad criticisms were never raised by their present issuers during the planning and execution phase.
That's called moral courage. My guess is that the officers criticizing Rumsfeld are honorable men, unlike Richard Clarke, and have in retrospect arrived at a different assessment of OIF's operational tier. I'd also point out that Swannack and Batiste were divisional commanders, and while they are undoubtedly as qualified to comment on the state of affairs as any civilian analyst or even their commanders, I find it funny how people like yourself will generously presume their experience has no effect on their analysis and yet never extend the same courtesy to OSD or the senior USCENTCOM leadership. Speaks volumes of how seriously you take this subject that you have to impose a narrative one could only find in an episode of the West Wing or some other corny Hollywood political-military thriller.