untier

As large as you like... one thing that i can't comprehend is how would the being conduct its body parts, if its body were several light years long... Anyways, what if a creature that's as large and had equivalent mass compared to earth were stalking slowly to earth and touched it... The inbetween gravity would matter much less... And their interactive impact would entirely judged by how powerful the punch were thrown when the creature touched earth...

i mean while the mass of the black hole increases, the gravity of it is increasing. So won't there be a limit extent that according to the cube-sqare law again the black hole itself can't bear its own inward force? Then won't the molecules or even atoms of it be broken? What will happen next? Won't a new stronger material be born against that overwhelming pressure to get to a new balance?

I mean inside a particle, such as an atom, there is a system and the system has many functional particles. Inside each of these particles there is a system and the system includes many functional particles as well, and so forth. This situation seems infinite and you can always get infinitely small things out of it, thus it seems like there's an infinitely small universe in it. If a black hole must have a shape and volume, every time it eats enough material and collapses again the material and structure of it will be reformed stronger in order to sustain extremely more gravity?

Will a black hole be infinitely small while it's absorbing more and more materials, since every particle includes an infinitely small universe internally?

According to my assossiation and sixth sense i think in a water or gas circumstance if you scale a given thing up, don't change its structure and material, the bigger form would be able to sustain higher pressure, wouldn't it? Why? What's the laws in that case? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedThough i know the trend isn't a straight line. There must be vertice or vertices and wave on the graph. Because the thing has its own gravity, when it's larger the gravity is greater, at a curtain size it will collapse itself...

Is it always correct that the bigger and higher density a planet is and has, the greater gravity of the planet is? And therefore animals on the planet would be shorter and broader rather than taller and lankier?

What would be a biophysical fundamental of the hulk then? If many of the super heros in comics aren't rational, why were the authors so childish that they even had thought about them?? I think at least the movies adapted from that kind of comics are partially dedicated to adults, aren't they?

Is there any material difference between human body and dinosaur body? The bones of huge dinosaurs ware diamond formed from the high pressure of their weight? Or else wouldn't they have been too weak proportionally? Or did the different structure reverse all?

How heavy do you think is the deadline that a natral animal can never lift things 1/2 time its own body weight however perfectly structured the animal is? Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedBy the way, so the spiderman is thoroughly a mythological character but a science fictional character? As he can jump so high, his legs must be bearing too much more force than the natral law allows.

Is it possible to create an animal, which weighs over 200 lbs, that can lift things weighing 850 times its own weight like what a rhinoceros beetle can do? I've heard according to cube-square law the larger an animal are, the smaller the ratio of lifted weight to its body weight is generally. Can this barrier be overcome by some scientific methods?