Jump to content

Proof of One

Senior Members
  • Posts

    129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Proof of One

  1. Thank you, I reviewed the site. I still am more classic physics in mind. UT still has some work to go yet, though I believe that String Theory will play a part. From a laymans point of view the probability that quanta energy are particles that move between planes seems to hold my interest most.
    I am not sure what you mean by “quanta energy,” “particles,” and “planes.” I understand the etiology of energy to mass, in a straightforward manner, that involves energy waves that are complex oscillations of elliptical structures that comprise the internal geometry of the first two states of light.

     

    I think the reason relates to a FTL limitation.
    I understand no such limitation. The photon effect, EPR, and myriad other anomalies, such as non-locality and universal entanglement, have no rationalization or reconciliation with observation with such an FTL limitation. If such were the case the Cosmos would seem as a “billiard table” rather than the clockwork that observation confirms. Can SR or GR explain the observed "speed" of the gravitational illusion of universal attraction?

     

    Logic regarding a mass/energy balance seems to point to the possibility that there has to be room for deviations, the problem is our current understanding of the universal rules do not allow for deviations without a mystical extra dimension.
    There is a much simpler explanation, with a logical etiology, however, to begin, there is a requirement that the ludicrous Big Bang be discarded as a paradigm.

     

    The String Theory allows for different planes; however, I don't know if the current definition of those dimensions is accurate. I suggest that the planes may actually be different combinations of the basic four, Width, Height, Depth and Time. For instance one plane may simply be a segment of infinite width. Another may be a combination of width and time. If you take all the various combinations you would have 16 planes of reality. If quanta energy could move freely between these planes a lot of observeable phenomena begin to make sense.

    ST can never unify forces that are metaphysical; before unification by the pomo elite, they must be able to define and rationalize the forces with observation . . . and their own standard models.

     

    Your thoughts are too complex; you must look for simplicity. Begin with seminal motion (exotic “dark” energy); describe its geometry; describes its complex, hyper-relativistic oscillations; explain coalescence of this energy; then, explain the mathematics of resonance, which underlies the morphing to the manifestation of mass (exotic “dark” matter); then, matter compresses until atoms are formed at Critical Compression within quasars and gamma-ray bursts . . . and the cycle continues ad infinitum. Of course, this is a bit simplistic; however it sure beats trying to explain accelerating, galactic recession with something that only “banged” once.

     

    I am sure the mathematical experts will achieve Nirvana in my lifetime and a UT will emerge.
    Not if peer revue has the last word.

     

    Who knows we may actually have already fallen through a black hole and the limitations are due to the constraints of existing inside of a singularity... I don't mean to be trite, the realities have yet to be discovered and sometimes we end up going through a lot of imaginary possibilities until they are linked through experimentation or proof into fact. This is science at it's best.
    Or worst, depending upon your perspective. If you can believe in “black holes” as defined by overextending GR beyond its minimal limitations, you can also believe that a mortal can be resurrected.
  2. The reason was the laser was a coherent single frequency tuned emitter in the UV range. If I recall correctly the frequency of the laser was tuned to the Photon emission frequency of the Cesium. If the emitter was single mode then there would not have been the mixture of frequencies as indicated in your link. Your link would be appropriate if the emitter had been a multi-modal source.
    Thanks for your time. Your info was quite complete and interesting to me.

     

    Your bio leads me to think you might find something of interest here:

  3. It was in either a High Energy Physics site or a Yahoo Science News link. If I

    remember correctly' date=' it was around Sept. or Oct. 2000. The idea was a container of Solid Cesium (Cooled to around 400K) with a Laser Optic Window at each end of the container was irradiated at one end with a laser light and based on the measure the effect was that the length of the container did not exist. When the photon wave front entered one end the same wave front emerged form the other end. It appeared to operate like semi-conductor hole technology. The excess of photonic energy at one end was passed in imaginarytime to the molecules at the far end of the target.[/quote']Is this helpful: Anomalous Dispersion, not FTL.

  4. Quick question what about the solid Cessium experiements done in 2000 and the

    follow up done this past summer. Both experiements indictate that light or information

    can be passed FTL or did I miss something?

     

    Pulsoid Theory (slightly analogous to String Theory) is entirely based on hyper-relativistic oscillations that would certainly predict such information passing . . . and other non-local events; even such as the photon effect.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.