In reference to the apparant "randomness" of ERV Insertions, what impact if any result in this example that ERV's are not that random afterall?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/11/051128010951.htm
This is an interesting thread, and I am currently engaged into a debate over it's findings. Lack of knowledge is a real issue so scuse me if this is a dumb question.
Are the insertions not random, and by this I mean that both Chimp & Human share the insertions but the insertions are not random. Meaning that the same virus inserts it's junk at the same place with both species!
The reply I am trying to deal with is:
Regards
Root
Radical Edward
Firstly, I must say that I enjoyed your post. For me as a devout evolutionist I find it at times complex and above my understanding with certain aspects. I used your post as a source for a forum debate. And I would be interested in your opinion on comments made against it.
I know it's long. But I am interested in your opinion and others here.
Many thanks
268 replies
Important Information
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.