Jump to content

Nicholas

Senior Members
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nicholas

  1. Boloney. We can't measure how fast the Earth orbits/moves

    through space around the sun?

    We can measure it moving through space.

     

    The reason there is no absolute rest is because everything

    in the universe is moving through space. That what no absolute

    rest actually means. :eek:

     

    Measuring motion through space is a sinch.

  2. A singular mass in a singular space-time would have

    the problem of its gravity making it a black hole.

    Space expansion cannot explain the Primorial egg dividing

    into single seperate particles.

     

    It began with matter spread out. It expanded from a point

    and under the pressure of space expansion mass was created.

    With mass orginally created seperated the gravity of the

    universe could be overcome by inflation/expansion. There

    has to be a finite density that is nonsingular;a Maximum Mass

    Density. I believe this directly follows the Pauli exclusion

    principle. There is always some space between particles. :cool:

  3. You have to realize that if you run the universe backwards

    that antimatter making up a galaxy would be evenly mixed

    with matter at the small space of the begining of the

    universe. So you can't get antimatter galaxies.

     

    As I like to say how does the primordial egg divide?

    It had to be all matter. You can't seperate the matter

    and the antimatter right from the very begining.

  4. Right on snail.

     

    Einstein dealt with the boundary problem; the space-no space

    problem; by introducing his gravity as a cosmology. If gravity

    curves space everywhere then the whole universe can curve

    back on itself. This is his finite but unbounded universe.

     

    Stephen Hawking is the same way.

  5. Oh really?

    Particle accelerators prove that the Earth is moving near the

    speed of light through space because those particles accelerated?

    You're a kook and BTW GR only explains curvilinear motion.

    Curved space-time only explains changes in direction.

    Can you see that?

     

    Otherwise can you explain to me how gravity accelerates?

    We know how it changes directions - curvature - but how

    does it change speed?

  6. I believe the universe started as Dark Energy rather than light

    energy. There had to be an original energy buildup and if it was

    light then any matter coming from it was equal parts positive

    and negative; equal amounts of matter and antimatter particles.

    But the original energy breaks all the laws.

    Once there was none.

     

    I believe only matter(without antimatter) was created through

    an original buildup of dark energy. I could be wrong but nobody

    has been able to show why there is only matter galaxies in the

    universe. I know there are hypotheses which are not satisfactory. :P

  7. What if the shape of space is a hypersphere?

    Where the universe is actually the surface of a hypersphere?

    If the universe is unbounded then space doesn't have to end.

    I know time doesn't.

     

    Why doesn't time end?

    If it did energy would end; no energy without time.

    So time ending would violate the conservation of energy.

    Energy can't disappeare. So time continues.

     

    As Hawking said: GR predicts its own downfall by predicting

    singularities.

     

    And singularities are ends in time (and space).

    No singularities!!! :D

  8. No superverse. No multiverse.

    Where did the one universe come from?

    The creator.

     

    The universe had a begining in a finite past and has expanded

    only at a finite rate in otherwords its finite.

     

    There is only one universe.

    I ask a question for you to answer:

    Where is the universe at?

  9. A singularity could be space-time starting as a point.

    That is the Big Bang. It could also be infinite density

    of mass or a bunch of mass as a single dimensionless point.

     

    I believe that singularities are violations of physics.

    With the exception that if you run space-time backwards to

    a begining it has obviously expanded from a singularity.

    If the Big Bang was a mass singularity also its gravity would

    prevent any expansion. It would be a black hole.

     

    As Stephen Hawking has said about them: GR predicts its own

    downfall by predicting singularities.

    If there are no singularities then what replaces them?

    Finite or Maximum Mass Density does.

    In otherwords there will always be space inbetween matter

    particles. I believe this is the Pauli Exclusion Principle. :D

     

    Mitch -- Light Fallls --

  10. When Einstein was asked about his Relativity he said:

    when the station comes to the train.

     

    It must be explained that the station is not moving through

    any space-time to get closer to the train. It is the train alone

    that accelerates(experiences weight).

     

    Therefore relative motion exists only in potential to

    the absolute movement in space-time of something else.

     

    This means that there is no reciprocity of effect in SR.

    Only the object that accelerates in space-time will

    experience length and time contraction.

     

    An object flying by the earth at very near light velocity

    will not have to wait to see Earth clocks. And they all

    will be blueshifted. There is no reciprocity there.

    Why should there be? :D

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.