Dhillon1724X

This first version contains significant known flaws — particularly in the treatment of graviton mass, the absence of a gauge-theoretic framework, and the lack of context behind certain derivations. I acknowledge these issues openly, and they will be addressed in future versions.Thats why i also changed the Title of Preprint and added ¨The beginning in it. This theory is not a finished structure — it is a base, a pillar. If it proves strong, it may support the weight of greater understanding in the future. But if it breaks under pressure, then let it break — and let its dust seed the foundations of something better. That, too, would fulfill its purpose.

Thanks Sir.Even those few words are enough to give me motivation for work.

Thank you — that’s a very important point. I admit I’m still learning the details of gauge theory and non-Abelian fields, so I really appreciate the clarification. My intention wasn’t to suggest that gravitons have a permanent rest mass or arise from a gauge structure like gluons. What I meant to explore is whether, under extreme energy conditions — such as photon collapse at or near the Planck scale — gravitons might behave as if they have mass temporarily. Not through gauge symmetry breaking, but possibly through nonlinear spacetime interactions. So this would be a local effect, not a property of free gravitons in vacuum. Just to add some context: I'm 14 years old and currently in 10th grade. As you probably know, the Indian education system is very mark-focused and leaves little room for deep independent exploration. I posted this theory hoping someone more experienced could refine or challenge it — and maybe, in some small way, I could contribute a new perspective. This is just Version 1, and I know there’s a long way to go. I'll read more into this area and be more careful with terms like “mass” in the future. Thanks again for pointing that out — I truly appreciate the feedback.

Thank you for the feedback — I understand your points and appreciate the clarity. I’d like to respond from the perspective of a developing alternative model that explores graviton behavior under extreme energy conditions. On mass and gauge symmetry: In standard quantum gravity, yes — massless spin-2 particles preserve gauge symmetry. However, my model is exploring whether gravitons gain effective mass temporarily during high-energy photon collapse events (e.g. near Planck density). This would not be a traditional "rest mass" but an emergent property in a non-linear quantum-gravitational environment — somewhat like massive gauge bosons in electroweak theory via symmetry breaking. On sourcing by local energy: I agree that gravity universally couples to all energy density. My theory does not deny that — rather, it focuses on extreme environments (like photon collapse near Planck density) as the origin point of quantized gravity (gravitons), which then spread and mediate gravity more generally. On clustering: Good point — standard gravitons should not cluster. My model proposes that in the earliest stages of the universe or during extreme astrophysical events (like neutron star collapse), the local energy density of gravitons may become high enough to warp spacetime significantly. This leads to black hole formation from graviton density thresholds, not clustering per se in the usual sense. About formatting posts: Got it — I’ll start summarizing key ideas directly in the post and use external links only as a secondary reference. Thanks for the tip. Sir thanks for instructions.I am new here so,i didnt know about it,and about the AI material thing i used AI as tool to overcome my weakness and problems.No one should have any problem from me using a advanced tool to simplify work as its my vision,my work.The AI material can be reffered to work which is solely created by AI.I deny todays limitations and created it from scracth,but it doesnt deny existing work atleast not completely,Pheraps It can be used in more advanced conditions if refined properly. As a student in 10th grade i didnt have enough time for now but i will try to refine it.

Hi everyone, I'm Kulraj Singh Dhillon, 14 years old, and I’ve recently published a draft theory on graviton formation — not as a final answer, but as an original proposal open for feedback.I used ChatGPT as a tool to guide me and formalise my maths and paper as i did it without any formal training,but just pure creativity. The core idea: I’ve built mathematical conditions for: Graviton energy and mass (based on Planck energy) Spacetime warping from graviton density A black hole formation condition derived from graviton clustering A new concept called PoRes — Propagation-Resilient Empty Space — regions where graviton fields cancel or fail to propagate This theory isn’t polished or perfect — but I’m trying to build a bridge between photons, gravitons, and quantum gravity. It’s all documented here: 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15789199 Would really appreciate critical, honest feedback — especially regarding: If the collapse condition seems plausible If the black hole equation from graviton density makes sense If the PoRes idea feels coherent or nonsense Thanks to anyone who takes the time to read.