Imagine Everything

Yes you did throw a lot at me lol but thats ok, I'll read them and try to understand as best I can, it will probably mean I have more questions for you all though I don't know why but I was wondering what a quark was yesterday and searched them a bit. Only to realise these or their duality(the invisible/unknown? part that makes the quark?) might be what I'm trying to refer to as SQEP's. From what I read, quarks can't or haven't been able to be split by the LHC and this means they are made up of 'something' that hasn't been discovered? yet. Then just to confuse me more, I read that they have discovered TetraQuarks which are made up of 2 quarks and 2 anti quarks. So I have a question or millions lol I think I remember reading that quarks exist only for a few seconds before they are bound to or become protons? or become something else. Tetra quarks only exist for a few fractions of a second according to the website I reads, I can now paste a link if Im allowed to finally show some evidence of what I think I am visualising. I suspect you all already know quite a lot about this but I'm happy to post a link if you want/allow me to. Tetra quarks seem to be close to the size I see my SQEP's as (sorry to use that term again) however, the things I'm trying to describe, in my head I see them as being created and dying or (knowing a little more now) before they also change into something else. So if a quark exists for a few seconds and a tetra quark exists for a few fractions of a second, am I describing Tetra quarks or perhaps does this go further and maybe there are quartet quarks? Quintet quarks that exist but die or are recreated at the point of their creation? Does physics work like this? In a scale? And I think I remember reading that they get changed by the electron field. If this is also right then I think from my idea that perhaps the electron field is what I am describing badly as the resonance of the quarks? Does this make sense? The electron field is the cosmic constant throughout the universe? If I changed the SQEP definition that I'm using to Quark, tetra quark or ??? quark, would that better make sense of what I am trying to explain at the beginning of this topic? I was amazed to read about tetra quarks because this is or is close to how tiny I see my SQEP's. I am confused about the anti quark bit though, where do they come from or is just nature being nature and again producing more pairs? And what is an exotic particle? Is this the same as a quantum particle?

Thank you and thank you. I'd like to explain my above answer to you also Bufofrog, The way you answered me with the monkeybutt thing and wag made me think I had upset you somehow. I wrote in the new members section that I wasn't a scientist and a couple of people directed me to putting my idea in the specualtion area which is why I did. My autism/aspergers couldn't understand why you seemed to be unhappy with me so I wrote what I did. I really wasn't looking for an arguement but in plain text, the context of things doesn't come out as it should or is meant sometimes. It also makes me hyper sensitive in a lot of things and I hate it, autism to me feels like a curse. So I am sorry. Perhaps I should have asked if I had done something to annoy or upset you instead. The way you responded showed great maturity and wisdom.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/inflationary-misconceptions-basics-cosmological-horizons/:Inflation and the Cosmological Horizon by Brian Powell This is interesting though I don't understand the maths, I think I get the basics of fixed point distances being seemingly changed as expansion moves further and further. Does this mean our galaxy and all the things in it are also expanding with the expansion? Does it mean our galaxy was once tighlty knitted but after some time we now live in a galaxy that seems to be bigger than it was to start with? If expansion also seems expands the fixed points (planets for instance - so physically impacting but not changing their fixed points) would a telescopes range not also be expanded with & by the expansion allowing us to see further into the galaxy? Does this mean everything gets stretched the more the universe expands or just space/dark matter? Does the expansion work with light this way? It says the inside of the ballon isn't included in the explanation, And here comes my imagination again & also how I see the 'end' of the universe-beginning of a new one,could the inside of a ballon be all the energy in the universe and when the ballon finally starts receding, this energy then draws back into a Singularity which tries to become nothing at the end of recession and then due to it not being able to be 'nothing' then explodes at that point recreating the big bang? Is receding / recession the right way way to describe what I think I'm trying to say or should it be more like retracts & retraction.? Is retracts and retraction the right way to describe this? Another part of my idea/thoughts are that the universe has to expand into 'something' I'm not trying to take credit for anything regarding this and I'm sure you guys and others have already thought of this, it just seems logical that if we live in a universe then our universe must live inside another one? So, is our universe inside another universe which is in turn inside another universe, a cosmic russian doll? And if mother nature is true everywhere, shouldn't there be pairs of universes? And then pairs of those pairs? And so and so on? A Magnaverse? inside a a Mega Magnaverse? Inside a ???? Or is our universe not a universe but a merely pre made area that expands into another pre made area? And that this area and others like it, are inside one super duper massive universe? Maybe like a power suply (our area) inside a house (massive universe). Could inflation have been caused by the final retraction? of all energy/QH trying to become nothing (negative expansion?) and it's very final point can't become nothing and explodes (Big Bang/God Nova?) with both negative and positive expansion at the very same time? Another 'pair' Can something expand and contract at the very same time? Can something expand and contract but in an overlap as it were? So say a ballon losing it's air inside, just before the very last released air molecule, we blow into it again to expand it?

I think I have to understand more so that I can term things better full stop tbh. I'm sorry if I'm confusing you or others with the way I'm trying to explain this. I didn't know there were so many different variations of flux types or meanings. I am definately out of my depth here Also, Phi is right and I it didn't sit with me well posting 4 more extracts/chapters here so if it's possible, could the other posts inc this one be deleted please? Only the ones numbered - 2. 3. 4. 5. not my original post about SQEP's Thanks

Thank you very much for the time and effort you put into this. I'll start reading tomorrow. I really appreciate this

Thanks, I learn something new every day

Thank you Mordred, thats very kind of you to offer this and if it's ok with you, I will think about it overnight. One question though if I may, would I need to have qualifications in anything or an advanced understanding of maths or similiar to learn physics? I also wouldn't want to waste your time, it wouldn't be fair on you or others. This I haven't heard of and interesting to me, does a bossa nova work the same way as super and kilonovas?

Ok, i can see why you said that and I agree my idea is more guesswork than not, however isn't this a SPECULATION thread? I also don't have and no doubt DO need to learn, physics knowledge so I can put this idea across better. I haven't stated and won't state that this is anything other than a speculative idea, not a theory, just an idea based on what I visualise. Am I misinterpretting the word speculation here? Are you being rude just for the sake of it? Should I stop posting? If you or the other people here think what I am posting is wrong or shouldn't be here, tell me, delete my profile, it's fine. I don't mind. It'd be a shame for me but I won't be any worse off. And I took the liberty of getting proof that this idea is mine before I posted anything. Whether it's right/wrong or close to being something.

whats a wag?

From your expert pov, do you think there is only one universe? I know my imagination is a little wild.

Yes you are wrong, I'm real. I'm posting extracts from an idea I've had in the hope you guys can help me make sense of it, dismiss it or perhaps confirm I have some sort of (even if slightly) credible idea. I've written a 20 chapter book/idea and have posted 5 of them now to hopefully get your perspective and knowledge. I won't post the other 15 yet as the replies to these first 5 might go on for a while. Feel free to see my first chapter about SQEP's, to which a lot of you nice people have replied to and me to them.

In life, there always seems to me to be something for something so that it can grow, develop, be countered and be recreated in some way, whether specific or vague animals/life sort of thing. If a nettle stings you, theres usually a dock leaf not far away. If bitten by a snake, theres a good chance there is an anti venom. From an Earth pov, it feels to me like either we were very fortunate to be created on a planet with everything we need to survive or we/life was designed here… It doesn’t mean we don’t have free thought, just that we are an extremely clever design. If I were to make a human, what better way? Maybe add better self healing abilities but otherwise? So assuming SQEPs exist and they create a constant fluctuation of kinetic resonance, surely this would mean a different resonance for each and every different type of possible SQEP, human or otherwise. So maybe they could be deteted by a ‘listening’ machine. Maybe there’s a scale on which these fluxes vibrate? From top to bottom, perhaps longest lived to lowest regardless of the fact we’re talking about really seriously fast moving things 10. Dark matter resonance? 9. Planetoid resonance? 8. Atmospheric resonance? 7. Material Resonance? 6. Life resonance? 5 Electrical resonance? 4. Magnetic resonance? 3. Cellular resonance? 2. Quantum resonance? 1. Elemental resonance? 0. Echo Particle resonance? Perhaps it could be something like this and all have their own unique vibrations/resonations. Maybe they are more detectable in space/dark matter due to the lack of audible noise there. Maybe in space they cant hear you scream but they can feel your hum. ?

So if we have the flux made up of SQEP’s and a reasonance particular to that flux type. There would be quite a lot of SQEP’s and their individul resonances, perhaps these may all be classed as a cluster of SQEP’s and their resonance. Maybe we could make recipes for different things, ailments, transport, Film, technology, plants… Maybe the cluster is what we should try and detect as it would be a stronger signal/hum. A cluster of air/table fluxes if you will or a cluster of branch/tree trunk or really whatever you can think of. Maybe its the clusters that are key after the formation of the flux initially. Perhaps clusters then go on to eventually form quantum particles and so on. Maybe we could create a cluster gathering device that in turn was programmed to convert those clusters into something else? Maybe we could make various different types of cluster devices, one of which might be an SQEP Transfer Manipulation Device (STMD) used for instant quantum manipulation travel? Maybe another device could be used to change the weight of an object so it may be moved more easily? Perhaps another device could be created to reverse global warming somehow? And another that manipulates the human body resonance/s to heal it from ailments?

What is it that holds our universe together? What is on the other side of our universe? What keeps these 2 universes apart if there are indeed 2 or more? So in a flux cluster universe as I visualise it, maybe the clusters themselves finally can't be reproduced anymore and whats left is the energy from the universe. Maybe when this energy meets the energy from the universe/s next to us it creates a positive/negative energy flux which keeps universes apart. Or something similar. Everything has an edge’ shape’ or shell’, everything. And if nature follows nature then our universe must have an edge’ shape’ or shell’. Maybe the energy retracts and the pressure is left at the edge of the universe?. Maybe only gravity/anti gravity fluxes are left and they create the constant force needed to keep the universe area open and big enough for the Big Bang/God Nova to grow into. I guess something should have to exist, even if the universe collapsed, there would have to be something for it to have collapsed from?. And when the Big Bang/God Nova happened, surely that would also have needed a pre made? existing area to create our universe in? If indeed there can be no such thing as ‘absolute nothing’

So how important are these SQEP’s? Extremely I believe, in the scheme of things. I visualise without these maybe nothing else would happen… or maybe something would but the opposite of this unviverse perhaps if it did…? Negative fluxes? In my head I think in the scheme of things they should exist. Nature being Nature. I think these things move so fast or are created so fast that, created to die, they can’t possibly gain any soldity at any stage during the flux. So even though they’re there, they are not. This only gets more confusing seemingly, but once you understand the basic SQEP dynamics I am seeing or trying to explain, the rest will I hope be understandable. They’re resonation? effect is also not visible, too small. However maybe we can detect it through the merging or forming of quantum atoms or below that slightly which then allow for the quantum world to do its thing aswell as the atomic world. Maybe some of these SQEP’s go on to create a resonance that in turn creates neutrinos or similar... Like a tree perhaps. All starts from a seed made from atoms....which in turn is made up of quantum particles which in turn is made up of SQEP's? Everything gets bigger with different, more varied? More entwined flux resonations? Resonation recipes perhaps? So perhaps if you have item1/item 2 flux resonations here, they could very well be entwined with the very same type of flux resonation millions? Billions? of light years away. Their resonance/kinetic energy might cross along all the other flux resonations in the universe until it joins its counter part flux in another galaxy? another part of the universe? Maybe its pasased along in a kind of kinetic highwayway, it would change its flux and the others it passed through along the way, but perhaps its kinetic quantum hair would keep going to create and maintain a link?. Hmm, maybe theres another level of the universe beyond particles and shadows... That should also be possible perhaps? I don’t know if either flux would get stronger but perhaps they can link and speak to each other somehow, maybe they NEED to be linked?, like one part of our brain talking to the other. Everything seems to me to be paired somehow. Paired and connected. I think (and this is crucial on all scalesto me) that the SQEP’s are created to die. So they are created directly into death. They must exist when they are created? But they can’t because they are dead. Something and nothing. Another pair and not the last one you will see in this idea. Sorry for the amount of text, I tried to keep it shorter than the chapter I have originally written. Honest

Thank you for confirming a BH is more dense than a Neutron star. This makes me very happy Most of my idea is pure guesswork based on an epithany? I seem to have had early august this year & I wrote most of it within 4 weeks. I literally seemed to just suddenly have a light turned on and as I started writing it, it led on and on to more things. I can visulaise everything in my idea but I seem to have the wrong words for things, so forgive me I am not saying things correctly. I haven't had any formal training, science lessons, chemistry physics. My childhood was crap and didn't allow for a stable tution without going into details. This is why all of you guys feedback and knowledge, confirmation, disection is so valueable to me. I was expecting this to fail completely at the first post tbh and the fact that it hasn't is really really cool and makes me smile. So thank you all Thank you again, however how would a nobody like me with no real training/studying go about doing something like this? I have watched many many 'How the universe works' and ancient aliens and even the odd programme by Professor Brian Cox who explained about how elements were created in Super Novas. So with the info I got from those, my wild imagination that is forever seeking patterns, logic and balance (I am awaiting confirmation of autism), I somehow connected and followed the 'dots' as it were that led me to this idea. I thought from what I've seen so far that BH's or rather the Event Horizon eventually produced so much heat from it's gravitational 'meals' that is was released as a quasar, light years long, into the universe? Is my understanding wrong? I know it could be wrong, thats why I came here to get your professional expert knowledge. Anything any of you tell me is invaluable. You're right. I was hoping that by posting my idea, you guys would explain it better, or enhance my understanding or even tell me I'm completely wrong. I just need to know. I feel and have felt during writing my idea down, that it couldn't possibly be true, it couldn't possibly work and that is is nothing more than a romantic idea. How could someone like me without any real science knowledge or background come up with something that explains what I see it as explaining? Especially when you read my other chapters. All the way through it, I felt like I was crazy to even think of this. Yet it seems, at least very slightly that some parts so far may have a tiny tiny bit of credibility? Is it possible to somehow calculate something like this? Are you able to do it? I don't either at least not in Chapter 1. I have written more about it further on in my book/idea which I will post as and when I get to it. Thank you so much for that grain of truth, you wouldn't believe how much that means to me! Perhaps I will get the chance to learn more about energy as this unfolds and also after I have finished posting all 20 chapters. It sounds like what you are telling me, might explain my idea works with the rest of it even more if I do. Whether it turns out to right or wrong. The Higgs field..is this the same person that discovered or theorised the Higgs Bosun? I don't know if you will believe me but the only things I think I have 'borrowed' are the things great and clever people have theorised. And I tried to not borrow their ideas but to relate to them at times to try and explain what I visualise. For instance, telling you that most of my known? knowledge comes from watching How the universe works and a few episodes. A relation/connection perhaps not a borrow. You are so right about the hard work. My head was almost screaming at me while I was writing my idea initially. I couldn't even begin to think how clever you all are to understand it as well as you all do The term sub quantum is just a term to try and describe how small I see these SQEP's. Or whatever their proper name might be. I see atomic level, then quantum is sub atomic? So to me these SQEP live on a even smaller scale than that. Maybe even sub sub sub sub quantum? I'm sorry I have no idea how to describe it other than that. I don't know how far down this scale could go. Please remember this is just an idea, it isn't meant or written as a scientificly researched idea, or proven idea or even based on hard evidence to prove it, it is literally just an idea. I am probably completely wrong but I had to find out. I came up with the chip and pin idea back in the 90's, though it wasn't chip n pin, it was chip n go if I remember rightly, I called an invention company, told them about it, couldn't progress it because I couldn't afford to prgress it and a few years later, out it comes as chip n pin. I'm still pissed at that. Anyway, so I had to know, I have to know if what I have thought of has any merit at all, I need to know if I have gone mad, possibly I have yet again come up with something that may be a 'thing' or just created nothing more than a romantic idea. Thank you so much for saying that I have little doubt what I say is perhaps misguided or badly written, explained in the wrong way and not backed up by anything except what I have seen and then gone on to think of? philosophise about? I really haven't borrowed this resonance thing (I don't think anyway) and don't even know much if anything about it, I just see this kinetic energy created by all the SQEP's inside a flux as having some sort of resonation. Resonation is probably even the wrong word but thats how I visualise it without knowing better. Maybe flux is the wrong term as well.? I just don't know. Its just how I visualise it. Perhaps with all you guys and gals input/feedback we can all explain this idea better after the whole idea (all 20 chapters) have been discussed/torn apart or confirmed? Again I can't thank you all enough for your replies. Each one enlightens me. I'm going to post the other 19 chapters in their own individual posts so that you can see my idea and how I perceive it. Hopefully this will help you guys enlighten me and prove me wrong, right or slightly on the right track.

Ok so to me its a really simple anwser but perhaps you guys have a much more indepth explanation. Something can't be 'absolute nothing' So a star goes Super Nova in it's last hurrah and becomes a neutron star, a neutron star goes Killa Nova in it's last hurrahh and creates a black hole (Minitar) but the black hole can't have a last hurrahh (unless it too can go 'something' Nova but I have never heard of that) so surely the black hole (I think of this as a Minitar not a black hole) must be more dense than a neutron star? But it can't be condensed to 'nothing' so surely there must be a core of some sort inside it? Perhaps it is extremely minute but still a core. I see the core being a seriouly condensed SQNEPKRF - Sub Quantum Neutron Echo Particle Kinetic Resonnce Flux or even a weird SQENPKPRF - Sub Quantum Neutron Echo Particle Kinetic Phase Resoonance Flux. I say weird because I wonder if the core is pure (beyond comprehensionly) dense neutrons with a neutrino atmosphere or vice versa. Surely no matter how much material that is drawn in by the immense gravity, the core cannot get any smaller than the very last state of BEING before it becomes 'nothing' So wouldn't that mean it would have to have a core of some size that just cannot become nothing? No matter how hard it tries. Is that why or partly why quasars are formed? I'm so sorry but I have no idea what you're talking about, though I have vaguely heard of Schrodingers cat. Please remember, I'm not a scientist and have had almost no science lessons at all in my life. What if Dark matter is a unique state made up of former SQEPKRF QH's? Dark energy would be the Kinetic energy from the gone before SQEP fluxes . Maybe black holes HAVE to draw this in so it can go on to create more material for the universe? An entity that is not only faster than light but also creates new 'things' fluxes' from all the QH stored inside it from 'things' that have been destroyed like planets and everything on those planets. And if these fluxs do exist, then they would be faster than the universe as they would exist between the edge of our universe and any other universes next to us. Perhaps black holes draw this information in, create new weird and wonderful fluxes with trillions? quadrillions? gazillions? of new SQEP's and their fluxes before sending it back out into the universe in a quasar to feed the universe and keep it expanding. I'm jumping ahead to something I have already written in my 'book' but to me it's like the big bang keeps on banging and banging and banging until the universe finally runs out of all material, quantum or otherwise apart from the kinetic energy that has been produced during it's lifetime? To me the big bang (God Nova?) is like a stupendiously clever animal. It's like it creates a usb stick full of data needed to create more material/things in the universe but it hasn't created the computer yet for it to go inside. The computer would be the black hole. The usb stick would be the new material coming out of and being produced by the black hole/quasar. I hope I said that ok. My head really hurts Sorry Mordred, I just don't know another way to describe what I see other than SQEP's and their fluxes.

awesome can't wait to tell you all my idea about about the Big Bang and how my SQEP flux idea might make sense of almost 'nothing' being something' at the same time.

wow just...I'm in amazement. I had no idea about the maths thing. So much of what I have written in my 'book' keeps popping up in things I read or see after and now even here. 😮 I guess this means I'm onto something

Thanks, Always 2 ways to look at things, 2 sides to every story

Hi swansont If I understand your question correctly, I first thought about this when I started learning more about black holes and their event horizons. This a giant merger of material being eaten? turned into neutrons? And it made me wonder if actually it wasn't a hole but a smaller verion of a magntar or pulsar, what I think of as a Minitar (but that's another chapter) It made me wonder if actually a smaller even more condensed core exists inside a black hole and has a neutron atmosphere. The atmosphere must surely at some point merge with dark matter at its edges? However far out these edges might be. I thought there must be a point at which the 2 become a 'third' item if you will when they merge. This item became a 'flux' to me. Yes My whole idea is also based on pairs. Something and nothing, simple and complex, night and day, left and right etc

Hi all, The above is the title of Chapter 1/20 regarding my very basic but complex idea. In it's very basic form, I see an edge of one item meeting the edge of another item and inbetween these 2 edges is a resonation flux formed from SQEP kinetic energy. I see SQEP's as the very very smallest anything can be before it tries to become 'nothing'. Item 1 & item 2 Breaking down item 1 SQEP's at it's edge and also doing the same to the item 2, this might create a merger between the 2 items where both item 1 and item 2 SQEP's become entwined. Not 50% item 1 and not 50% item 2 but instead graduating from both items and going in both (and all?) directions between them and creating from item 1 to item 2 - Item 1 99.9% / Item 2 0.01% SQEP's all the way through until eventually it becomes item 1 0.01 / Item 2 99.9% and vice versa and possible in their millions? billions? trillions? The SQEP's are created directly to die but the kinetic energy from their creation carries on with the QH (quantum hair) data from all SQEP's as 'nothing' (or so I have read) cannot exist and SQEP's are so small that they are one step away from being 'nothing'. This kinetic energies created, create a resonance flux. All beit very breif and small The Phase flux contains all kinetic energy created by the SQEP's between these 2 items. Item 1 SQEPKRF1 - Sub Quantum Echo Particle Kinetic Resonance Flux 1. Item 2 SQEPKRF2 - Sub Quantum Echo Particle Kinetic Resonance Flux 2. Item 1/Item 2 SQEPKPRF - Sub Quantum Echo Particle Kinetic Phase Resonance Flux I see these SQEPKRF's in the same way people shed their skin. Always happening, all the time items are next to each other. The space between to 2 edges is now phased or merged with each others SQEP's at all times while these 2 items are next to each other. As soon as one is moved, the SQEPKPRF would change to fit the new 'double' or 'pairing' of whatever they then ended up next to edge to edge. So now think about the room you are in and how many edges are meeting each other & the SQEPKRF + SQEPKPRF being created. Quite mind blowing? I see these fluxes as being everywhere all the time, wherever they are, as EVERYTHING in the universe has an edge. More mind blowing? I'll stop there as I have maybe already written too much, so I apologise in advance if I have. Like I said before, I'm not a scientist and this is the easiest way to me, for me to describe it. Please go easy on me if you reply, I won't neccessarily understand your terminolgy for something like this. I have no idea if it true and I have 20 chapters regarding what this can do , might have done and might continue to do, that I wrote recently that I am dying to have clever people like yourselves read and and tell me if I'm right, a little bit right or just plain imaginative. Thank you for reading and for any answers you might reply with. The SQEP's could actually be SQEPEPEPEP.... I don't know how small things can get but perhaps they are Sub QuantumEcho Particle Echo Particle Echo Particles or even more?

ok np

Hi again, Thanks exchemist, I think its the copyright protection I am talking about without knowing more. I just need to do a couple of things with my idea 1st proof wise but I'm hopeful I can post it here tomorrow afternoon or wednesday. I'm very eager to see what you all think of it. I'll be posting it under the physics topic as it seems to belong there more than anywhere else. But ofcourse if an admin thinks it should be somewhere else, please feel free to move it to the relevant topic. I think the only facts I might have are the theories I have seen on science programmes and some stuff I have read. However, I have no ego regarding this and will be as honest as I possibly can. But please realise whilst I think I am a bit clever, I do not have the understanding or words that you very clever people do. So please bear with me if I am using terms that you might have an already scientific name for in my idea.

I think you are right, I really do, might be many many fundamental flaws im missing. Thats why I came here and have also asked Professor Brian Cox if he will let me speak to him about it. I don't suppose he will, I'm a nobody and an even bigger nobody when it comes to this stuff. Thank you for replying to me by the way, it means a lot.