HawkII

On 3/26/2024 at 1:30 PM, dimreepr said:

Looks like you didn't read the thread, oh the irony... 🙄 

You do a 'Too long didn't read' then. I just read the Thread OP 1st post just now and I can't make head to tail of it.

On 3/23/2024 at 7:12 PM, Guille Yacante said:

I am 27 years old, I only finished high school, but I have found the cure of autism and a lot of chronic illnesses.

Do a 'Too long didn't read' answer to what causes Autism please.

1 minute ago, ahmet said:

what you ask is not understandable in the thread text. But to reply just to the title, that is not the doable thing in my prediction or seems like an invalid /unapplicable question. Because the golde ratio is a number. 

I want to see where the verticle line of the golden ratio divides the IQ graph.

Quote

You take a line and divide it into two parts – a long part (a) and a short part (b). The entire length (a + b) divided by (a) is equal to (a) divided by (b). And both of those numbers equal 1.618. So, (a + b) divided by (a) equals 1.618, and (a) divided by (b) also equals 1.618.

What does it look like / how long does it take when the constructive Inteference pattern on the board behind the slits become two horrizontal bands?

Is there a Video of this moment?

I haven't read any of this but, considering the Universe and the Brain are similar structures AND I believe in Ghosts, it doesn't seem too much of a stretch to me that IF God was real, Science would find 'em.

I would like to see a comparison of Truth tables vs Logic gates using Water flow

Probably because a Photon is its own anti-particle

Quote

What Bible verse says Jesus was a carpenter?

 

 

His trade is unmentioned in stories concerning Joseph, admittedly few. Only twice is the word carpenter used in the Christian scriptures: when Jesus is identified as “the carpenter's son” (Matt. 13:55) and “the carpenter” (Mark 6:3).

Would any of the Son of God's: Chairs, Tables, Three Legged Bar Stools  among other things remain intact today?

15 hours ago, swansont said:

So where’s the math?

Quote

 

lux

 

It is measured in footcandles or lux – it is the amount of light (lumens) falling on a surface (over any given square foot or square meter). Therefore, light intensity is measured in terms of lumens per square foot (footcandles) or lumens per square meter (lux).

 

I have found a new discovery which is the basis of the mathematical model

This! Is a Spectrum of visible light

Notice how Green is in the middle

'Greens are perceived more readily than any other color because of the combined color perception of rods and cones '

Now look how closely this resembles the Ditorus Cross section in the First Post.

'A mathematical model usually describes a system by a set of variables and a set of equations that establish relationships between the variables. '

My mathematical model is this.

You add a Prism to the Double Slit experiment.

I propose there would be a relationship between the variable of Observing to non observing. That equation would be the following_________ The colours would have the same amount of intensity when all added together.

Edit: According to me. Anti Electrons (Positrons) would be Mobius Strip shapes

They made some progress lately. They were patting themselves on the back for having the reactor last fractions of a second longer. The game company miHoYo, gave the Project loads of money to do more into this.

Wouldn't surprise me if they cancelled the Project. They could just keep coming up with new Fusion techniques, get funded, then try again. (No guarantee any would work)

PROFIT ££££££££££££££££££$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

Ok. I'm done with this Thread now.

Double slit experiment with a difference. Move the Photon/Electron emitter across.

Predicted outcome, the 'Interference wave pattern' would move across with the emitter. This to me would prove that it's actually moving the 4D Hyper Ditorus across

1 hour ago, swansont said:

Not sure why you would use the spoiler feature, on that, but it doesn’t explain why that’s a predicted result. There really isn’t much about this that would let anyone else predict outcomes to support or reject the idea. 

The solutions to the Schrödinger equation are orthogonal to each other. A salient point to this is that there is a mathematical model involved, which allows for prediction and testing.

I got inspired by the Game show 'Takeshi's castle' when coming up with the combining all the Quantum experiments. Such an ambitious thing to do. You're right about it not providing enough information to let anyone else come up with alternatives. I was under the impression people wouldn't ask questions then say to themselves 'Let's see if this person's right. After all, to my knowledge no one has ever combined them before'

A better understanding of an existing mathematical model this would provide if true.

I've come up with a much simpler experiment that only needs the Double slit experiment apparatus. I'll have to use MS Paint to show its simplicity. So that will be my next Post on this Thread in the near future.

10 hours ago, swansont said:

Any further thought on an experiment that would support your conjecture?

I'm guessing you know the proposed experiment is in the first Post's 'Reveal hidden content' Spoiler. Turns out I meant to put 'Quantum Spin Hall effect' in there instead of 'Quantum Hall effect'

As any good Scientist would, I've been trying to think of things that would disprove instead of prove my conjecture. I thought of Atoms that have lots of Protons and Electrons. But to my astonishment, the Electron Orbitals all go through the middle of the Nucleus at different angles.

9 hours ago, TheVat said:

What happens when the ditorus is stimulated?

This topic is Stimulating enough

Upon further research, I have found it is called a '4D Hyper Ditorus'

Just making that known as I found my own speculation thread on Google whilst looking into this.

Quote

The electron orbitals of the hydrogen atom describe the wave-like behavior of an electron in atom and they determine the probability to find it in a particular space region.

Seems familiar to a  Ditorus Cross section no?

Do you have any posts with all the information on it, so that newcomers can read it with ease of access?

To be honest, a big part of the reason I post these things, is so that if someone else comes up with it afterwards, I can say I came up with it to.

Quick recap; I believe that the interference pattern on the wall of a double slit experiment is the 2D cross section of a 4D Torus. And that when we observe this 2D cross section, it produces a 3D shadow. Just as any 4D shape would to a lower dimension observer

Quote

I have some numerical findings about electrons that I think are new:

49 minutes ago, swansont said:

Can you explain what you mean by the radius being “fit to a toroidal geometry”

Spoiler

What is the difference between a toroid and a torus?

 

 

 

 

If the axis of revolution passes through the center of the circle, the surface is a degenerate torus, a double-covered sphere. If the revolved curve is not a circle, the surface is called a toroid, as in a square toroid.

 

Spoiler

 

 

 

 

40 minutes ago, swansont said:

!

Moderator Note

Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. You’ve provided none. No model, no experimental confirmation. Nada. Zilch. That makes this thread a candidate for the trash can.

 

I have almost finished the 4D shape interpretation for the Quantum entanglement

Feast your eyes on this;

For example; Photon A & Photon B are entangled. Photon A & Photon B are separated by a large distance. When you observe Photon A..... You are actually seeing the 3D Shadow projected by Photon B! Vice versa! If that's hard to get the head around just remember this; It is known that when you look into the 4th spatial dimension, you can see all of the 3D world, as if you have X-Ray vision. It is also known that non-locality means they are occupying the same space.

You can think of it like two quantumly entangled Sundials. You get to see what the time is in another place by looking at your own Sundial, and they see your time.

(I will look into entanglement with more than two objects)

___________________________________________________________________

In terms of model, I reckon the cross section of the Torus matching the wave function of the Double slit experiment is sufficient. But yes, I agree, there is no experiment that I have thought of.

__________________________________________________________________________

I legitimately believed that other members on this forum would have been interested enough to pitch in and help. That's why I went on about the team and wanting the title changed to encourage support.

I have been looking at the quantum spin of an Electron. As you can see, there are Three lines coming out of the box. Just like how there are three sets of lines in the 4D hypersphere diagram. Good result

(EDIT: Upon closer inspection, only some yellow dots on the previous 4D Hypersphere diagram, had a yellow dot intersecting all Three lines)

I have been probing the Quantum Entanglement phenomenon. With the 4D object interpretation in mind.

Something I noticed is that the Entanglement seems to only be acknowledged when observed. Perfect for the 'Observing causes it to cast a 3D shadow'. More work needed but a good result so far.

44 minutes ago, Bufofrog said:

Does anyone on the team know they're on the team?

All remaining Team members on the Team have a mutual Team spirit.

9 hours ago, zapatos said:

Can everyone who is on your team please stand up? I must have missed the invitation.

My Team operates on an opt out basis.