Preston Taist

Any word on if we've witnessed a graviton yet?

Thank you for putting thought into your relpy. This is nice.( I mean this politly. i am not trying to insult anyone.) While you contened that the verses in the aforementioned do not necessarily refer to universal expansion, I would disagree. When one reads these vercese in context with the chapters they are contained in, one could certainly contened that the "stretching" they refer to is the expacion we see today. I think it would be interesting if you would mention what you think this stretching refers to in the text.(again, im not trying to insite anything). Snakes eating dust is quite obviously used here figuratively to emphasise the fact that snakes were to crawl on the ground. I think that the Pope might not speak for all christians, especialy those that aren't Roman Catholic. So perhaps the disagreement that the Pope has with the Bible shouldn't be submitted as a view that the whole of the church holds. Please write back. Edward, where is that found in the text? so i can look it up. what book at least.

I like that 2.

The gradure the better my friend! i see what your saying and i like it, but your right, for realativity to work than there can be no universal reference frame

If you talk strings than everything is energy.

If you look at it like that than yes.

There is speculation that if a craft were to enter a rapidly spinning black hole from its axis that it might be possible to pass through one. The acceleration at the axis wouldn't be "c" if the star were rotating fast enough. Hey Radical Edward, could you tell me where i could read about the perturbation you were talking about? just a link or somthing.thanks

My apologys if it came accross that i was attacking anyone. I assure you all that i meant only to stimulate conversation, if I have offended anyone i am sorry.

I understand that it my be hard to overcome, intelectualy, the arguments that are in vogue concerning the Bible's scientific accuracy. i have heard the argument that parts of the bible are "demonstrateably" wrong and i had hopped that you would offer somthing different. But in light of your comments i will submit to you that there is nothing in the Bible that contredicts any major aspect of modern physics. On the contrary, there are many instances in the anciant hebrew writings in which modern scientific views are referred to, even though the anciant people of scripture had no natural evidence to cause them to take such a view. An example: The repeated referrence to the "stretching of the heavens"* a theory that has only recently been observed.(Einstein's Cosmological Constant) I look forward to your responce. * Isaiah 40:22, 42:5, 44:24, 45:12, 48:13, Job 9:8, Psalms 104:2 Jeremiah 10:12, 51:15

If you would, I would like to hear your reasons why god can not be the God of the bible. try to avoid the old arguments, write somthing fresh. convince me.