Ned

Electricity , gas , fuel , food etc should be expensive . Televisions , beds , cookers ,housing etc, should be cheap . I have never known such a backwards planet !

The human neurological reference frame (the mind) endures circumstances and these circumstances are what causes the most common depression , namely neurological circumstance depression ! Although pharmaceuticals or ''mild'' drugs can temporary help us forget we are depressed , they will never be a cure . The only way to illiinate neurological circumstance depression is to change the circumstance . However , some circumstances can't be changed ! Death of loved ones for example is something that can't be changed .

Because of this ! I am sad you are out because I also give a value of 1 , a conserved constant, for each point of topological space !

The curve is the edge of the space-time reference frame , I couldn't draw a sphere . x is the radius from the observer (ourselves) to the edge of space-time . You can consider the diagram in being 3d . I have quickly drew it for you from a different viewpoint .

I think absolute space in my idea could be viewed as a preferred frame where the physics differs slightly from the relative reference frame (space-time) . However , there is some properties that remain the same , xyz for example . The only major difference to Newtons absolute space compared to my presentation , is that the absolute space does not have an absolute time . The reason for this is because there is no energy or matter in that region of space to age , it is timeless ! Added- I forgot to mention that my version of absolute space has several properties and my main interest is the conservation of energy property . My thoughts on this consider Diracs thoughts on particles popping into and out of existence . The difference in my version is that the particles pop into existence and are conserved rather than annihilating. I personally cannot see how something that is receding away from an observer can have a red-shift of light when light passing through space is transparent . It makes no sense to me that we are detecting 750nm? from distant bodies . Perhaps the red-shift is just simply a congestion of photons , the ''telescope end'' .

I agree that the observation of a Hubble red-shift is fact but could we interpret this information in any other way than ''expansion'' ?

What do you mean by fixed ? I mean stationary I mentioned earlier that I call my diagram a Quantum Mainframe . A Quantum mainframe is a volume of spatial conserved energy that is relatively stationary (fixed) . The conserved energy bounded to space and having inertia . Simultainety ! Perhaps how I view and interpret standard physics is different than you interpret it . Can we start here ? ''A Hilbert space is a vector space equipped with an inner product which defines a distance function for which it is a complete metric space.'' In my diagram I drew a vector x , which is a vector space with an inner product and a distance function . Is my understanding of Hilbert space incorrect ? (x1,x2,....xn) If you can't draw it then you don't understand it ! I have broke the diagram into sections for you to understand . We can assume that the Hilbert space is filled with a Higgs field .

Yes , the inner ''dot product'' is a fixed reference that would be consistant with a conserved constant Eigen value . This conserved Eigen value I consider is bounded with space (space and time) . I believe Einstein tried to explain space and time as being''fused'' together , agreeing with what I am saying . A volume of ''dot product'' (Hilbert space) could be viewed as a Higgs field , an energy field that occupies all of observable space , a space-time ''fabric'' . This ''fabric'' of space would be consistant with Einsteins space-time curvature , the Higgs field curving relative to flat space . The Michael Morley experiment demonstrated that the speed of light was constant in all directions , again this is consistant with a constant Eigen value of space-time . If space-time did not have a constant conserved Eigen value , then all wave-function collapses because the energy would be conserved by space and become bounded with space . The Eigenstate fixed reference fluctuates in value as unbounded energy passes through the fixed reference but the Eigen value constant always remains the same ,E0,u0 . Absolute space having a value of E1,u1, in regards to permitivity and permeability .

You seem very confused on the subject of time and what is time ! Time only exists as a measure and to help you with your confusion , I have provided a diagram .

Your question is nonesense because speed is distance over time d/t ! Your question reads , what is the d/t of time which makes no sense ! Perhaps you mean , what is the rate of time ? Our present measured rate of time is 1 second of history per 1 second passed measure !

To me an eigenstate expansion is any systems ability to increase in volume as a cause of internal energy increase that differs from the conserved state . A simple example of this is the expansion of metal when heated ! ΔV∝Δu where V is volume and u is internal energy

I will try to answer your questions with a single diagram . I have made it as complete as I can , note that almost everything in the diagram is present mainstream science . I will explain that all unbounded energy within the paramaters of space-time eventually makes it way to the edge of space-time , where the wave-function collapses and the energy joins the edge of space-time , expanding the measure of what I call a Quantum Mainframe .

Arrr man , you think I'm some sort of bot ? The point is we haven't a clue how old the Universe is , the same as we don't know how big space is . The point is there is no proof that distance visible sources were once located where the Earth is . Ya know who passed away days ago as do we all , our m'aam will be sadly missed . Ahhh , see I am not a bot ! Also , which clown gave me a neg rating , for what ? I don't think your reply was in anyway fair to the topic and is disruptive !

I do not know who wrote the link you provided but it is very contradictory and does not seem an accurate account . From my understanding space-time is any mathematical model that uses the 4 dimensions of xyzt . Space-time having nothing to do with a ''fabric'' ? Can anyone provide evidence that the underlying space can in anyway change other than hearsay ? Can anyone explain why somebody has fabricated a variation version of expansion without proof that doesn't conform to conventional expansion physics ? A Hilbert space or perhaps a Higgs field could expand or grow but I can't see how an underlying space that isn't matter or energy could do anything . It is my personal opinion that Newton was correct about absolute space and the immovable nature of space but I also think that Einstein was correct too . If we consider that a Hilbert space or a Higgs field in being ''fused'' with space and indistinguishable from space in appearance, then this allows for space-time curvature and expansion . However , it isn't the underlying space that curves or expands but rather instead , it is the substance that is ''fused'' with space . The problem is though , any of the mentioned could be viewed as an aether which we are unable to detect presently ! Additionally in considering any sort of spatial ''fabric'' , we'd have to consider the laws of conservation of space , asking the question does space have the potential to conserve an amount of energy.

Isn't 93 billion light years just a length between visible sources ? You say the spacial size of the entire Universe is unknown , which I think I will have to agree with . Is there any specific math that can describe the unknown size of the Universe ? What do you mean by spacial expansion ? Do you mean the diameter between visible sources is increasing that expands the measure of space between points or do you mean something else ?

What do you mean by which one ? The universe is all of space and the contents , there is only one universe I know of .

Hi, how big is the Universe ?