Jump to content

kba

Senior Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    70

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by kba

    Tyrannosaurus in the wetlands

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 11/1/2023 at 3:56 PM, martillo said:

    In my visual perception the shown tail would not be enough to achieve the balance with that so big head the T Rex has.

    T.Rex was able to have such big head because he hadn't normal-sized "hands", so his body was perfectly balanced for walking on the land.

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    14 hours ago, swansont said:

    Not moving ≠ at the center

    I wrote "it sounds like", not "=".

    14 hours ago, swansont said:

    Your linked site does not contradict Bufofrog’s statement.

    It's how do you like. The name of article is "Speed of the Milky Way in Space". May be "velocity of the milky way" isn't equal to "Speed of the Milky Way" for you and for article's authors? I don't know. Or/and "Space" isn't equal to "the universal level" by Bufofrog’s? May be ask him?

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 12/1/2023 at 7:05 PM, Bufofrog said:

    I'm sure you meant m/s^2 due to a typo.

    Yes, of course.

    On 12/1/2023 at 7:05 PM, Bufofrog said:

    If the mass in the universe is more or less as observation shows, there should be no force or acceleration in any particular direction on a universal scale.

    Evenly distributed mass is better for uniform acceleration. It connected with dynamical nature of gravitational force.

    Do you know about "retarded potentials"? If no, then I have to provide this link for you.

    Spoiler

    This article's author (RIP) didn't made the logical conclusion, that retarded potentials of gravitational force will increase the speed of bodies and particles in the direction of their movements. He didn't knew the real nature of gravitational force and, highly likely, he beleaved to uniform inertial motion. Saddenly, I was late to discuss my theory with him(

     

    On 12/1/2023 at 7:05 PM, Bufofrog said:

    Observation indicates that indeed there is no acceleration or even a velocity of the milky way in any direction at the universal level.

    How about an extra velocity of stars on numerous galaxies which scientists connect with mistiqal Dark matter? Just look at name of topic you comment )

    And, can scientists directly register a = 0.00000000868 m/sec² for our Galaxy or its stars?

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 11/29/2023 at 5:57 PM, studiot said:

    So consider either a universe with only one single body in it

    or alternatively one single body so far from any other body that it may be considered isolated ?

    Can you describe the motion of such a body ?

    Did you already considered it? In the absolutelly empty space with no other bodies, particles and fields. Do you know what Aristotle said about it?

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 11/29/2023 at 7:45 PM, Bufofrog said:

    The easiest way to understand your theory, I think, is to show us a simple calculation.

    Could you use your theory to calculate the orbital period of the moon?

    For what? Are you waiting that calculations will show something different that Newton's mechanics?

    Only calculations I can provide right now is a caluculation of global gravitational acceleration (inducted by a forces of "faraway stars" - by "Mach's principle" - that support any motion).

    Spoiler

    Scientist, even that agreed with "Mach's principle", didn't knew how it is correct, because they thonk that the body, moved by inertia, anytime is in the equal gravity force condition. But, actually, there is a dominating gravitational force from the direction to which body does move.

    This acceleration, accordingly to estimated mass and size of Universe, is about:

    a = MG/R^2 = 0.00000000868 m/sec.

    What difference on a gravity force between the Earth and Moon in the static you can get with such value of acceleration? Just a microscopic one.

    At the same time, the global acceleration is able to accelerate the proton of any star upto:

    v=273.7*10^9 m/sec per 1 billion years - it's almost the speed of light!

    And it can accelerate the stars in the galaxies, that speeds are different from described by Newton's mechanis, aspecially on their periphery. Do you think that higher velocity of these stars is because of "Dark matter", which holds the stars on their orbits, and which cannot be acted by other forces? I do not think so. I think that spiral look of galaxy shows us how stars goes away from its center, accelerating by global acceleration of so-called "inertial motion" (which, actually, isn't uniform and stright lined)

    Spoiler

    PS. I'm not from scientists, I just do offer my old (quarter of century) ideas that they could use to solve some Physics problems and to understand many existing phenomenas. A lot of time has already passed, but no one of them was solved yet. I'm just observing, year by year, the newer and newer evidences for my theory )

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    4 hours ago, studiot said:

    An associated question

    If a force is applied to a body will it necessarily change its state of rest or motion ?

    Yes, if this body is free.

    4 hours ago, studiot said:

    A body will continue in its state rest of uniform motion, in its right line,  unless acted on by a force

    This declaration of Newton's First Law is absolutely incorrect. There is no uniform motion for free bodies. All of them or keep in rest, either moves with acceleration which you cannot register locally, at the short distances.

    0

    Dynamic Gravity theory to explain dark matter, cosmic ray energy, etc.

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    7 hours ago, studiot said:
      On 7/30/2022 at 4:57 AM, studiot said:

    Fine so let us compare two examples.

    You supply one example and I will  supply the other.

    We can then work both examples in accordance with your laws and Newton's laws and compare.

    Here is my example.

    On my table sits the book I am reading.

    It does not move, it just sits there.

    It is midnight here so good night, I will look for your example and analysis of mine tomorrow.

    I don't understand what do you mean with your example. Your book in the same time does move with your table arount the Earth's axis, around the Sun, around the Galaxy's center, etc.

    0

    Interpretations of QM

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 12/31/2022 at 8:29 PM, Genady said:

    With so many, how does one pick a favorite?

    Yet new one - "Dynamical gravity" theory which explains QM in atom and for particle's interaction.

    No more Dice for God and no more tries for gravity quantumization.

    0

    Gravity (split from A change in Gravity killed the dinosaurs!)

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    5 hours ago, Genady said:

    Yes, independent of science.

    Is scales independent of science?

    He didn't mean to find weight changes, he just registered them. And, exactly, he didn't know about relative gravity changes. His explanation for phenomena of weight changes was incorrect.

    Only useful thing in his researches for me is long time weight measurement I never made.

    Just make your own measurement to refute his one.

    0

    Gravity (split from A change in Gravity killed the dinosaurs!)

    in Speculations

    Posted · Edited by kba

    The confirmation for relative gravity changes I've found in the Internet: 

    As the independed gravity researcher Anatoliy F. Chernyaev [1937-2013] from Russia was argued about 10 years ago, he made weight measurements for various materials and he did registered their weight changes during the traveling of Earth on its orbit, per year. These changes were in range 1÷7 gr. for every 100 gr. of weight and had, generally, wavelike form. As he said, these changes were depended on distance of Earth from the Sun.

    0

    hijack from Hypothesis about the formation of particles from fields

    in Trash Can

    Posted · Edited by kba

    On 8/1/2022 at 10:55 AM, computer said:

    Hypothesis about the formation of particles from fields

     

    The hypothesis is an extension of field theory and an attempt to explain the internal structure of elementary particles.

    I have a model of particles, which unifies all basic physical interactions: electrostatic, strong and gravitational. In this model, particles are represented as spheric formation of fundamental field, and we do not need any quarks. I consider particles as made from continued field which can be represented by means of unified "primary "elements". All kinds of Matter are constructred by such elements. We can describe their properties, but we cannot extract and separete them from continued field.

    IMO, it is impossible to describe particles using electromagnetics equations, we need equations which describes "primary elements". These New physics's equation will describe both, particles and electromagnetic field.

    I'm not that familiar with field theory, as you are. But I'm sure that you are on the right way. You can try to describe equations for "primary elements", if you wish. And we'll get New physics ;)

    On 8/4/2022 at 10:12 AM, computer said:

    It seems that due to this there is also an attraction of massive bodies, they slide into a common gravitational pit.

    Why they must slide? Is there some additional force which make them to slide?

    Just do not look back to General relativity. :)

    0

    Living away from earth (split from Mars gravity issue)

    in Astronomy and Cosmology

    Posted · Edited by kba

    8 hours ago, mistermack said:

    Tests have shown that for 1g of artificial gravity, a diameter of 224 M or more will give an environment that doesn't cause problems of balance in humans. I posted this earlier, you must have skimmed over it. 

    You wrote about an effect on the inner ear, not about Coriolis's force.

    Actually, orbital period of 30 second for 224m of diameter isn't so slow rotation speed.

    Anyway drop aside effect will depend on speed of movement inside the rotating station.

    I like an idea, but I don't think that the mining on the moons or asteroids is more profitable than it is in the Earth's oceans, if you do plan to delivery raws to the Earth's land.

    0
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.