SEKI

I have already admitted that introduction of cohesive force is not compatible with the framework of traditional quantum theories. This fact does not mean introduction of cohesive force is false. Rather, it means that traditional quantum theories are only approximately true. Can't he understand this simple logic? I am tired of discussing with persons without intellectual honesty. Considering their difficult conditions, however, I cannot but feel sympathy. So, I would like to say goodbye. Thanks a lot. I wish all of you good luck.

Please point out a defect in the arguments of (3).

I wrote many times that cohesive force is like surface tension. How can equation with cohesive force be linear/unitary?

I meant it is negligible from an experimental perspective. Feynman's calculation method adopts ~exp(ikx) for each free-quantum wavefunction. I have no clue about how to reform Feynman's calculation method. If you come up with one, I admit you are a genius.

Introduction of cohesive force is my logical consequence. Impact to Schrödinger's system is considered to be negligible. The problem is that to Feynman diagrammatic calculation method, renormalization and the like.

You should read (3) carefully and point out what is wrong.

I am sorry, I have neither ability nor intention to develop a mathematical model. I can only come up with a schematic model. If someone develop a mathematical model, I am very thankful. Anyway, thanks a lot for your kind suggestion.

It seems that what the word 'model' means is different between you and me. In fact, expressions such as 'schema model' are generally used. I didn't know the word 'model' means for physics professionals. Sorry.

I am only an amateur who majored in physics for 6 years about 40 years ago. So, if no fatal flaw is pointed out in my model/hypothesis, I am greatly satisfied. I am so sorry for those who posted from a professional perspective. Please ignore this topic if you do not find a fatal flaw. Thank you very much.

OK. And, yes, no math is presented. Cohesive force is considered to be like surface tension. I am sorry, I don't know how to deal with surface tension mathematically. I wrote in the first posting on this topic: "You may feel that the above quantum model is quite odd and half-baked, though I suppose that my model is leastwise better than that of Copenhagen, many worlds theories and so forth". I have never asserted my model is fine great theory. I just presented a rough tentative model. So, I hope that any fatal flaw of my model is pointed out, if any. Thanks.

Cohesive force is considered to be like surface tension. It is to dirty the traditional mathematically beautiful theory, which is to be only approximately true. I think the reality is not necessarily beautiful after all. I am sorry.

Sorry, I have no idea. Have you read the whole sentences of my first posting?

I wrote: >>Sorry, I am not interested in discussing (1) and (2). >>Cardinal points of my model is (3)-(6). You wrote: >Is this all about wave packet dispersion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_packet#Dispersive (3) is about wave packet dispersion. (4)-(6) are not. So, your question was not appropriate. If you are not interested in the cohesive force, I recommend you to quit.

No. Please read.

Reading your comments, I think that your reading haven't reached to the end of (3) yet, or that you have a problem in reading comprehension. Please read enough before commenting. Sorry, I am not interested in discussing (1) and (2). Cardinal points of my model is (3)-(6). This is a good question. The most important point of my model is introduction of cohesive force. I am sorry, it is to dirty the traditional mathematically beautiful theory, which is to be only approximately true.